Sarwo Edhy Sofyan , Teuku Meurah Indra Riayatsyah , Khairil , Eric Hu , Akram Tamlicha , Teuku Muhammad Reza Pahlefi , H.B. Aditiya
{"title":"土空气热交换器的计算流体动力学模拟:串联和并联布置的热性能比较","authors":"Sarwo Edhy Sofyan , Teuku Meurah Indra Riayatsyah , Khairil , Eric Hu , Akram Tamlicha , Teuku Muhammad Reza Pahlefi , H.B. Aditiya","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study uses Ansys Fluent to compare the thermal performance of series and parallel earth air heat exchanger (EAHE) systems for cooling. The model was validated using experimental data from published literature and matched simulation results. The sensitivity study examined how length, diameter, and ground surface coverings affected EAHE performance. The relationship between effectiveness and the Number Transfer Unit (NTU) of EAHE was explored along with the soil thermal regime. The simulation results show that the series EAHE can achieve a lower temperature drop than parallel. With an input air temperature of 32 °C and EAHE lengths varying from 10 m to 50 m (in 10 m increments), the 50 m EAHE produced the lowest outlet air temperatures: 27.2 °C for the series configuration and 28.8 °C for the parallel arrangement. Changing the EAHE diameter (4–6 in) results in a ±0.2 °C outlet air temperature drop for both setups. EAHE performed best under short grass soil cover, yielding 1.4 °C and 0.5 °C lower outlet air temperatures, for series and parallel arrangements than the asphalt cover. The pressure drop increased proportionally with EAHE's length. Simulation results indicate a ±6 times larger pressure loss in the series design compared to the parallel setup. The effectiveness-NTU relationship shows that parallel EAHEs are 15 % more effective than series ones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 102932"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024011873/pdfft?md5=8dc4994c755b8d718e878caee52e1656&pid=1-s2.0-S2590123024011873-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational fluid dynamic simulation of earth air heat exchanger: A thermal performance comparison between series and parallel arrangements\",\"authors\":\"Sarwo Edhy Sofyan , Teuku Meurah Indra Riayatsyah , Khairil , Eric Hu , Akram Tamlicha , Teuku Muhammad Reza Pahlefi , H.B. Aditiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study uses Ansys Fluent to compare the thermal performance of series and parallel earth air heat exchanger (EAHE) systems for cooling. The model was validated using experimental data from published literature and matched simulation results. The sensitivity study examined how length, diameter, and ground surface coverings affected EAHE performance. The relationship between effectiveness and the Number Transfer Unit (NTU) of EAHE was explored along with the soil thermal regime. The simulation results show that the series EAHE can achieve a lower temperature drop than parallel. With an input air temperature of 32 °C and EAHE lengths varying from 10 m to 50 m (in 10 m increments), the 50 m EAHE produced the lowest outlet air temperatures: 27.2 °C for the series configuration and 28.8 °C for the parallel arrangement. Changing the EAHE diameter (4–6 in) results in a ±0.2 °C outlet air temperature drop for both setups. EAHE performed best under short grass soil cover, yielding 1.4 °C and 0.5 °C lower outlet air temperatures, for series and parallel arrangements than the asphalt cover. The pressure drop increased proportionally with EAHE's length. Simulation results indicate a ±6 times larger pressure loss in the series design compared to the parallel setup. The effectiveness-NTU relationship shows that parallel EAHEs are 15 % more effective than series ones.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Results in Engineering\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102932\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024011873/pdfft?md5=8dc4994c755b8d718e878caee52e1656&pid=1-s2.0-S2590123024011873-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Results in Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024011873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024011873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Computational fluid dynamic simulation of earth air heat exchanger: A thermal performance comparison between series and parallel arrangements
This study uses Ansys Fluent to compare the thermal performance of series and parallel earth air heat exchanger (EAHE) systems for cooling. The model was validated using experimental data from published literature and matched simulation results. The sensitivity study examined how length, diameter, and ground surface coverings affected EAHE performance. The relationship between effectiveness and the Number Transfer Unit (NTU) of EAHE was explored along with the soil thermal regime. The simulation results show that the series EAHE can achieve a lower temperature drop than parallel. With an input air temperature of 32 °C and EAHE lengths varying from 10 m to 50 m (in 10 m increments), the 50 m EAHE produced the lowest outlet air temperatures: 27.2 °C for the series configuration and 28.8 °C for the parallel arrangement. Changing the EAHE diameter (4–6 in) results in a ±0.2 °C outlet air temperature drop for both setups. EAHE performed best under short grass soil cover, yielding 1.4 °C and 0.5 °C lower outlet air temperatures, for series and parallel arrangements than the asphalt cover. The pressure drop increased proportionally with EAHE's length. Simulation results indicate a ±6 times larger pressure loss in the series design compared to the parallel setup. The effectiveness-NTU relationship shows that parallel EAHEs are 15 % more effective than series ones.