{"title":"全天与半天的母牛-犊牛接触对母牛和犊牛表现的影响","authors":"K.A. Zipp, U. Knierim","doi":"10.1016/j.animal.2024.101318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cow-calf contact systems (<strong>CCCs</strong>), where dairy cows nurse their own calves for several weeks while being milked, have some advantages in terms of animal welfare. However, one major challenge is the loss of collected milk due to suckling and milk ejection problems during milking. Reducing daily CCC can decrease milk losses. Our study investigated the effect of half-day CCC during daytime (<strong>HC</strong>, n = 11 cows) compared to whole-day contact (<strong>WC</strong>, n = 13) and no contact (<strong>NC</strong>, n = 14) on harvested milk yield, milk content, udder health, calving interval, and calf weight gain in a dual purpose breed-herd with concentrate-free feeding. ‘Nursing’ (9 weeks <em>postpartum</em>) was followed by separation of cow and calf, but still with visual CCC and twice daily milk feeding by nipple buckets (6 l per day, ‘in sight/milk feeding’). During the 11th–12th week, calves were housed out of sight and gradually weaned. Calves of NC were separated from their mothers 1 day <em>postpartum</em>, obtained 6 l whole-milk per day and were gradually weaned. During ‘nursing’, NC and HC cows gave more milk than WC in the morning. In the evening, HC and WC gave less milk than NC, but HC cows had also a slightly lower milk yield than WC. During ‘nursing’, a reduced fat content (−1% point) pointed at milk ejection problems in both CCC treatments independent from daytime. After separation from the calf (periods: ‘in sight/milk feeding’ and ‘out of sight/weaning’) and over the whole lactation, milk yield between HC and the other treatments did not significantly differ while WC cows gave less milk than NC cows. Protein contents were higher in dams than in NC. There were no indications of differences in the incidence of mastitis, somatic cell score or calving interval between treatments. During ‘nursing’, NC calves gained about 0.3 kg less per day than CCC-calves (n<sub>NC</sub> = 12, n<sub>HC</sub> = 7, n<sub>WC</sub> = 10). After separation from the mother, there was a growth check in both CCC groups. During ‘in sight/milk feeding’, HC gained less weight than NC and WC (n<sub>NC</sub> = 11, n<sub>HC</sub> = 9, n<sub>WC</sub> = 10). Hereafter, weight development did not differ. Two weeks after weaning, nursed calves were still significantly heavier than NC (n = 5–8). Nine weeks of HC during the day compared to WC helped to reduce losses of sellable milk during the nursing period and over the whole lactation while calf development was similar.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50789,"journal":{"name":"Animal","volume":"18 10","pages":"Article 101318"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of whole-day versus half-day cow-calf contact on cows’ and calves’ performance\",\"authors\":\"K.A. Zipp, U. Knierim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.animal.2024.101318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cow-calf contact systems (<strong>CCCs</strong>), where dairy cows nurse their own calves for several weeks while being milked, have some advantages in terms of animal welfare. However, one major challenge is the loss of collected milk due to suckling and milk ejection problems during milking. Reducing daily CCC can decrease milk losses. Our study investigated the effect of half-day CCC during daytime (<strong>HC</strong>, n = 11 cows) compared to whole-day contact (<strong>WC</strong>, n = 13) and no contact (<strong>NC</strong>, n = 14) on harvested milk yield, milk content, udder health, calving interval, and calf weight gain in a dual purpose breed-herd with concentrate-free feeding. ‘Nursing’ (9 weeks <em>postpartum</em>) was followed by separation of cow and calf, but still with visual CCC and twice daily milk feeding by nipple buckets (6 l per day, ‘in sight/milk feeding’). During the 11th–12th week, calves were housed out of sight and gradually weaned. Calves of NC were separated from their mothers 1 day <em>postpartum</em>, obtained 6 l whole-milk per day and were gradually weaned. During ‘nursing’, NC and HC cows gave more milk than WC in the morning. In the evening, HC and WC gave less milk than NC, but HC cows had also a slightly lower milk yield than WC. During ‘nursing’, a reduced fat content (−1% point) pointed at milk ejection problems in both CCC treatments independent from daytime. After separation from the calf (periods: ‘in sight/milk feeding’ and ‘out of sight/weaning’) and over the whole lactation, milk yield between HC and the other treatments did not significantly differ while WC cows gave less milk than NC cows. Protein contents were higher in dams than in NC. There were no indications of differences in the incidence of mastitis, somatic cell score or calving interval between treatments. During ‘nursing’, NC calves gained about 0.3 kg less per day than CCC-calves (n<sub>NC</sub> = 12, n<sub>HC</sub> = 7, n<sub>WC</sub> = 10). After separation from the mother, there was a growth check in both CCC groups. During ‘in sight/milk feeding’, HC gained less weight than NC and WC (n<sub>NC</sub> = 11, n<sub>HC</sub> = 9, n<sub>WC</sub> = 10). Hereafter, weight development did not differ. Two weeks after weaning, nursed calves were still significantly heavier than NC (n = 5–8). Nine weeks of HC during the day compared to WC helped to reduce losses of sellable milk during the nursing period and over the whole lactation while calf development was similar.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal\",\"volume\":\"18 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 101318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731124002556\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731124002556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of whole-day versus half-day cow-calf contact on cows’ and calves’ performance
Cow-calf contact systems (CCCs), where dairy cows nurse their own calves for several weeks while being milked, have some advantages in terms of animal welfare. However, one major challenge is the loss of collected milk due to suckling and milk ejection problems during milking. Reducing daily CCC can decrease milk losses. Our study investigated the effect of half-day CCC during daytime (HC, n = 11 cows) compared to whole-day contact (WC, n = 13) and no contact (NC, n = 14) on harvested milk yield, milk content, udder health, calving interval, and calf weight gain in a dual purpose breed-herd with concentrate-free feeding. ‘Nursing’ (9 weeks postpartum) was followed by separation of cow and calf, but still with visual CCC and twice daily milk feeding by nipple buckets (6 l per day, ‘in sight/milk feeding’). During the 11th–12th week, calves were housed out of sight and gradually weaned. Calves of NC were separated from their mothers 1 day postpartum, obtained 6 l whole-milk per day and were gradually weaned. During ‘nursing’, NC and HC cows gave more milk than WC in the morning. In the evening, HC and WC gave less milk than NC, but HC cows had also a slightly lower milk yield than WC. During ‘nursing’, a reduced fat content (−1% point) pointed at milk ejection problems in both CCC treatments independent from daytime. After separation from the calf (periods: ‘in sight/milk feeding’ and ‘out of sight/weaning’) and over the whole lactation, milk yield between HC and the other treatments did not significantly differ while WC cows gave less milk than NC cows. Protein contents were higher in dams than in NC. There were no indications of differences in the incidence of mastitis, somatic cell score or calving interval between treatments. During ‘nursing’, NC calves gained about 0.3 kg less per day than CCC-calves (nNC = 12, nHC = 7, nWC = 10). After separation from the mother, there was a growth check in both CCC groups. During ‘in sight/milk feeding’, HC gained less weight than NC and WC (nNC = 11, nHC = 9, nWC = 10). Hereafter, weight development did not differ. Two weeks after weaning, nursed calves were still significantly heavier than NC (n = 5–8). Nine weeks of HC during the day compared to WC helped to reduce losses of sellable milk during the nursing period and over the whole lactation while calf development was similar.
期刊介绍:
Editorial board
animal attracts the best research in animal biology and animal systems from across the spectrum of the agricultural, biomedical, and environmental sciences. It is the central element in an exciting collaboration between the British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) and represents a merging of three scientific journals: Animal Science; Animal Research; Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. animal publishes original cutting-edge research, ''hot'' topics and horizon-scanning reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences at the molecular, cellular, organ, whole animal and production system levels. The main subject areas include: breeding and genetics; nutrition; physiology and functional biology of systems; behaviour, health and welfare; farming systems, environmental impact and climate change; product quality, human health and well-being. Animal models and papers dealing with the integration of research between these topics and their impact on the environment and people are particularly welcome.