{"title":"裂变反应堆的关停剂量率计算:MS-CADIS 方法在 OPAL 中的应用","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There have been considerable advances of shutdown dose rate (SDDR) calculation methods for fusion related problems, however applications of these methods in the fission reactor field have hitherto been sparse. The present study attempts to bridge this gap by investigating the applicability of SDDR calculation methods for fission reactor problems. Specifically, we aim to assess and validate whether recent advances in SDDR methods can be successfully applied in fission research reactors. To this end, we estimate the shutdown dose rate distribution at the Open Pool Australian Light water reactor (OPAL) using the rigorous two step (R2S) computational method, and we compare the calculated results with the experimental data. This method utilizes a 3D reactor model implemented in the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) transport code, the AutomeD VAriaNce reduction Generator (ADVANTG) code for geometry discretization and variance reduction calculations, and the Oak Ridge Isotope GENeration (ORIGEN) inventory code for activation calculations. To ensure robustness, we employ two variance reduction techniques, Forward Weighted Consistent Adjoint Driven Importance Sampling (FW-CADIS) and Multi-Step Consistent Adjoint Driven Importance Sampling (MS-CADIS). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first MS-CADIS method implementation for fission reactor problems. The SDDR is estimated at ten locations within the experimental hall, all situated more than 4 m away from the reactor core.</div><div>The paper shows that, the experimental observations are within the lower and upper bounds of the simulation results for 4 out of 10 locations, while the remaining observations are within a factor of 7, with one significant outlier. The calculated average dose rate is within 5% of the nominal values of the experimental observations for 3 locations. The computational results are within statistical uncertainty by using two different variance reduction techniques, with significant computational advantage of MS-CADIS over FW-CADIS for SDDR calculations. The results indicate that the combination of SDDR distribution maps, estimated dose rate energy dependance, and activation information are powerful tools in identifying the radioisotopes and reactor components dominating the SDDR. These results can contribute to better radiation safety practices in contaminated areas, by enabling the minimal dose path planning or by improving radiation shielding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shutdown dose rate calculation for fission reactors: An application of the MS-CADIS method to OPAL\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There have been considerable advances of shutdown dose rate (SDDR) calculation methods for fusion related problems, however applications of these methods in the fission reactor field have hitherto been sparse. The present study attempts to bridge this gap by investigating the applicability of SDDR calculation methods for fission reactor problems. Specifically, we aim to assess and validate whether recent advances in SDDR methods can be successfully applied in fission research reactors. To this end, we estimate the shutdown dose rate distribution at the Open Pool Australian Light water reactor (OPAL) using the rigorous two step (R2S) computational method, and we compare the calculated results with the experimental data. This method utilizes a 3D reactor model implemented in the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) transport code, the AutomeD VAriaNce reduction Generator (ADVANTG) code for geometry discretization and variance reduction calculations, and the Oak Ridge Isotope GENeration (ORIGEN) inventory code for activation calculations. To ensure robustness, we employ two variance reduction techniques, Forward Weighted Consistent Adjoint Driven Importance Sampling (FW-CADIS) and Multi-Step Consistent Adjoint Driven Importance Sampling (MS-CADIS). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first MS-CADIS method implementation for fission reactor problems. The SDDR is estimated at ten locations within the experimental hall, all situated more than 4 m away from the reactor core.</div><div>The paper shows that, the experimental observations are within the lower and upper bounds of the simulation results for 4 out of 10 locations, while the remaining observations are within a factor of 7, with one significant outlier. The calculated average dose rate is within 5% of the nominal values of the experimental observations for 3 locations. The computational results are within statistical uncertainty by using two different variance reduction techniques, with significant computational advantage of MS-CADIS over FW-CADIS for SDDR calculations. The results indicate that the combination of SDDR distribution maps, estimated dose rate energy dependance, and activation information are powerful tools in identifying the radioisotopes and reactor components dominating the SDDR. These results can contribute to better radiation safety practices in contaminated areas, by enabling the minimal dose path planning or by improving radiation shielding.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024003986\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024003986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shutdown dose rate calculation for fission reactors: An application of the MS-CADIS method to OPAL
There have been considerable advances of shutdown dose rate (SDDR) calculation methods for fusion related problems, however applications of these methods in the fission reactor field have hitherto been sparse. The present study attempts to bridge this gap by investigating the applicability of SDDR calculation methods for fission reactor problems. Specifically, we aim to assess and validate whether recent advances in SDDR methods can be successfully applied in fission research reactors. To this end, we estimate the shutdown dose rate distribution at the Open Pool Australian Light water reactor (OPAL) using the rigorous two step (R2S) computational method, and we compare the calculated results with the experimental data. This method utilizes a 3D reactor model implemented in the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) transport code, the AutomeD VAriaNce reduction Generator (ADVANTG) code for geometry discretization and variance reduction calculations, and the Oak Ridge Isotope GENeration (ORIGEN) inventory code for activation calculations. To ensure robustness, we employ two variance reduction techniques, Forward Weighted Consistent Adjoint Driven Importance Sampling (FW-CADIS) and Multi-Step Consistent Adjoint Driven Importance Sampling (MS-CADIS). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first MS-CADIS method implementation for fission reactor problems. The SDDR is estimated at ten locations within the experimental hall, all situated more than 4 m away from the reactor core.
The paper shows that, the experimental observations are within the lower and upper bounds of the simulation results for 4 out of 10 locations, while the remaining observations are within a factor of 7, with one significant outlier. The calculated average dose rate is within 5% of the nominal values of the experimental observations for 3 locations. The computational results are within statistical uncertainty by using two different variance reduction techniques, with significant computational advantage of MS-CADIS over FW-CADIS for SDDR calculations. The results indicate that the combination of SDDR distribution maps, estimated dose rate energy dependance, and activation information are powerful tools in identifying the radioisotopes and reactor components dominating the SDDR. These results can contribute to better radiation safety practices in contaminated areas, by enabling the minimal dose path planning or by improving radiation shielding.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field.
Please note the following:
1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy.
2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc.
3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.