金属间化合物 Fe3Al 的真实基态是什么?

IF 3.4 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR Solid State Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2024.107709
M. Všianská , M. Šob
{"title":"金属间化合物 Fe3Al 的真实基态是什么?","authors":"M. Všianská ,&nbsp;M. Šob","doi":"10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2024.107709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We discuss recent doubts about the true ground-state (GS) structure of the intermetallic compound Fe<sub>3</sub>Al. It seems that it should be the D0<sub>3</sub> structure (observed experimentally), but there are some considerations that, perhaps, D0<sub>3</sub> might be a high-temperature (&gt;400 K) structure and the GS at 0 K might be the L1<sub>2</sub> structure because there might be a high energy barrier between both structures and, when the temperature is lowered, the system is not able to transform into the (perhaps) lower-energy L1<sub>2</sub> structure. To elucidate this problem, we re-interpret our recent extended ab initio electronic structure calculations for Fe<sub>3</sub>Al performed with the help of the VASP code and using various exchange-correlation energies within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA). Regrettably, some calculations provide the L1<sub>2</sub> and some of them D0<sub>3</sub> as the GS structure.</div><div>To resolve this question, we performed further calculations testing 9 frequently applied metaGGAs, such as TPSS, revTPSS, M06-L, SCAN(-L), rSCAN(-L) and r<sup>2</sup>SCAN(-L) representing a higher rung of the Jacob's ladder. It turns out that also here some meta-GGAs lead to L1<sub>2</sub> and some others to D0<sub>3</sub> GS structure and, again, we cannot decide.</div><div>In this way, the present results represent the very first step on the way to understand the energetics of the Fe<sub>3</sub>Al compound and its ground state. We hope they may motivate future theoretical and experimental work in this direction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":432,"journal":{"name":"Solid State Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the true ground state of intermetallic compound Fe3Al?\",\"authors\":\"M. Všianská ,&nbsp;M. Šob\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2024.107709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We discuss recent doubts about the true ground-state (GS) structure of the intermetallic compound Fe<sub>3</sub>Al. It seems that it should be the D0<sub>3</sub> structure (observed experimentally), but there are some considerations that, perhaps, D0<sub>3</sub> might be a high-temperature (&gt;400 K) structure and the GS at 0 K might be the L1<sub>2</sub> structure because there might be a high energy barrier between both structures and, when the temperature is lowered, the system is not able to transform into the (perhaps) lower-energy L1<sub>2</sub> structure. To elucidate this problem, we re-interpret our recent extended ab initio electronic structure calculations for Fe<sub>3</sub>Al performed with the help of the VASP code and using various exchange-correlation energies within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA). Regrettably, some calculations provide the L1<sub>2</sub> and some of them D0<sub>3</sub> as the GS structure.</div><div>To resolve this question, we performed further calculations testing 9 frequently applied metaGGAs, such as TPSS, revTPSS, M06-L, SCAN(-L), rSCAN(-L) and r<sup>2</sup>SCAN(-L) representing a higher rung of the Jacob's ladder. It turns out that also here some meta-GGAs lead to L1<sub>2</sub> and some others to D0<sub>3</sub> GS structure and, again, we cannot decide.</div><div>In this way, the present results represent the very first step on the way to understand the energetics of the Fe<sub>3</sub>Al compound and its ground state. We hope they may motivate future theoretical and experimental work in this direction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solid State Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solid State Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1293255824002747\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solid State Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1293255824002747","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们讨论了最近对金属间化合物 Fe3Al 的真实基态(GS)结构的怀疑。它似乎应该是 D03 结构(实验观察到的),但也有人认为,D03 可能是一种高温(400 K)结构,而 0 K 时的 GS 可能是 L12 结构,因为这两种结构之间可能存在高能量屏障,当温度降低时,系统无法转变为(可能)能量较低的 L12 结构。为了阐明这个问题,我们重新解释了最近在 VASP 代码的帮助下,利用广义梯度近似(GGA)中的各种交换相关能量对 Fe3Al 进行的扩展 ab initio 电子结构计算。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了进一步的计算,测试了 9 种常用的元 GGA,如 TPSS、revTPSS、M06-L、SCAN(-L)、rSCAN(-L) 和 r2SCAN(-L),它们代表了雅各布阶梯的更高一级。事实证明,同样在这里,一些元 GGA 导致了 L12,而另一些则导致了 D03 GS 结构,我们同样无法做出决定。我们希望这些结果能激励我们今后朝着这个方向开展理论和实验工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is the true ground state of intermetallic compound Fe3Al?
We discuss recent doubts about the true ground-state (GS) structure of the intermetallic compound Fe3Al. It seems that it should be the D03 structure (observed experimentally), but there are some considerations that, perhaps, D03 might be a high-temperature (>400 K) structure and the GS at 0 K might be the L12 structure because there might be a high energy barrier between both structures and, when the temperature is lowered, the system is not able to transform into the (perhaps) lower-energy L12 structure. To elucidate this problem, we re-interpret our recent extended ab initio electronic structure calculations for Fe3Al performed with the help of the VASP code and using various exchange-correlation energies within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA). Regrettably, some calculations provide the L12 and some of them D03 as the GS structure.
To resolve this question, we performed further calculations testing 9 frequently applied metaGGAs, such as TPSS, revTPSS, M06-L, SCAN(-L), rSCAN(-L) and r2SCAN(-L) representing a higher rung of the Jacob's ladder. It turns out that also here some meta-GGAs lead to L12 and some others to D03 GS structure and, again, we cannot decide.
In this way, the present results represent the very first step on the way to understand the energetics of the Fe3Al compound and its ground state. We hope they may motivate future theoretical and experimental work in this direction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Solid State Sciences
Solid State Sciences 化学-无机化学与核化学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
214
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Solid State Sciences is the journal for researchers from the broad solid state chemistry and physics community. It publishes key articles on all aspects of solid state synthesis, structure-property relationships, theory and functionalities, in relation with experiments. Key topics for stand-alone papers and special issues: -Novel ways of synthesis, inorganic functional materials, including porous and glassy materials, hybrid organic-inorganic compounds and nanomaterials -Physical properties, emphasizing but not limited to the electrical, magnetical and optical features -Materials related to information technology and energy and environmental sciences. The journal publishes feature articles from experts in the field upon invitation. Solid State Sciences - your gateway to energy-related materials.
期刊最新文献
Study of substrate dependent microstructural properties of sputtered Mo/CZTS heterojunctions using X ray diffraction ZnO/Zn3(PO4)2/CeO2 photocatalysts formed on zinc by plasma electrolytic oxidation Synthesis of Nd2Sn2O7 pyrochlore with different lattice disorder degrees and oxygen vacancy contents Influence of crystalline phase structure of rare earth oxides on active oxygen and basic sites Crystal structures of the R1.33Ni3Ga8 (R = Tb, Ho, Er, Tm, Lu) compounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1