肝脏脂肪变性:超声定性和定量评估与组织学比较

Zhi Xin Tan, Bryan Mehta, Kieran Kusel, James Seow, Marilyn Zelesco, Steven Abbott, Rebecca Simons, Glenn Boardman, Christopher J. Welman, Oyekoya T. Ayonrinde
{"title":"肝脏脂肪变性:超声定性和定量评估与组织学比较","authors":"Zhi Xin Tan,&nbsp;Bryan Mehta,&nbsp;Kieran Kusel,&nbsp;James Seow,&nbsp;Marilyn Zelesco,&nbsp;Steven Abbott,&nbsp;Rebecca Simons,&nbsp;Glenn Boardman,&nbsp;Christopher J. Welman,&nbsp;Oyekoya T. Ayonrinde","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Globally, B-mode ultrasound is the most common modality used for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. We aimed to assess the correlation between qualitative liver ultrasound parameters, attenuation imaging (ATI) and histopathology-diagnosed steatosis grade obtained from liver biopsy. Our secondary aim was to examine the interobserver variability of qualitative ultrasound features.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cohort study was performed which included adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who had same-day liver ultrasound, ATI and liver biopsy for grading hepatic steatosis severity between 2018 and 2022. The qualitative US features for hepatic steatosis were independently scored by three radiologists and interobserver variability was examined. Histologic steatosis grade, ATI and qualitative ultrasound parameters were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety patients were included; 67% female with a median age of 54 (IQR 39–65) years. The radiologist's overall impression had the highest correlation (very strongly correlated) with histologic steatosis grade (r = 0.82, P &lt; 0.001). ATI coefficient and all qualitative ultrasound B-mode features except for liver echotexture and focal fat sparing were strongly correlated with histologic steatosis grade (r ≥ 0.70, P &lt; 0.001). Most qualitative ultrasound features had good agreement between observers (Kappa statistic 0.61–1.0, P &lt; 0.001), (Kendall coefficient 0.92, P &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The examined qualitative ultrasound parameters and ATI had good-excellent performance for diagnosing clinically significant hepatic steatosis; however, the radiologist's overall impression had the best correlation with histologic steatosis grade. Our findings suggest an ongoing role for qualitative liver ultrasound assessment of hepatic steatosis despite the emergence of newer quantitative measures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"27 3","pages":"179-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajum.12381","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hepatic steatosis: Qualitative and quantitative sonographic assessment in comparison to histology\",\"authors\":\"Zhi Xin Tan,&nbsp;Bryan Mehta,&nbsp;Kieran Kusel,&nbsp;James Seow,&nbsp;Marilyn Zelesco,&nbsp;Steven Abbott,&nbsp;Rebecca Simons,&nbsp;Glenn Boardman,&nbsp;Christopher J. Welman,&nbsp;Oyekoya T. Ayonrinde\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajum.12381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Globally, B-mode ultrasound is the most common modality used for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. We aimed to assess the correlation between qualitative liver ultrasound parameters, attenuation imaging (ATI) and histopathology-diagnosed steatosis grade obtained from liver biopsy. Our secondary aim was to examine the interobserver variability of qualitative ultrasound features.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective cohort study was performed which included adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who had same-day liver ultrasound, ATI and liver biopsy for grading hepatic steatosis severity between 2018 and 2022. The qualitative US features for hepatic steatosis were independently scored by three radiologists and interobserver variability was examined. Histologic steatosis grade, ATI and qualitative ultrasound parameters were compared.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ninety patients were included; 67% female with a median age of 54 (IQR 39–65) years. The radiologist's overall impression had the highest correlation (very strongly correlated) with histologic steatosis grade (r = 0.82, P &lt; 0.001). ATI coefficient and all qualitative ultrasound B-mode features except for liver echotexture and focal fat sparing were strongly correlated with histologic steatosis grade (r ≥ 0.70, P &lt; 0.001). Most qualitative ultrasound features had good agreement between observers (Kappa statistic 0.61–1.0, P &lt; 0.001), (Kendall coefficient 0.92, P &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The examined qualitative ultrasound parameters and ATI had good-excellent performance for diagnosing clinically significant hepatic steatosis; however, the radiologist's overall impression had the best correlation with histologic steatosis grade. Our findings suggest an ongoing role for qualitative liver ultrasound assessment of hepatic steatosis despite the emergence of newer quantitative measures.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"179-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajum.12381\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 在全球范围内,B 型超声是诊断肝脂肪变性最常用的方法。我们的目的是评估肝脏超声定性参数、衰减成像(ATI)和肝活检组织病理学诊断脂肪变性等级之间的相关性。我们的第二个目的是检查定性超声特征的观察者间变异性。 方法 我们开展了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2018 年至 2022 年间接受过当天肝脏超声、ATI 和肝活检以对肝脏脂肪变性严重程度进行分级的成年患者(年龄≥ 18 岁)。肝脏脂肪变性的定性 US 特征由三名放射科医师独立评分,并考察观察者之间的差异性。比较了组织学脂肪变性分级、ATI和定性超声参数。 结果 共纳入 90 名患者;67% 为女性,中位年龄为 54(IQR 39-65)岁。放射科医生的总体印象与组织学脂肪变性等级的相关性最高(非常相关)(r = 0.82,P < 0.001)。除了肝脏回声纹理和局灶脂肪疏松外,ATI系数和所有定性超声B型特征都与组织学脂肪变性分级密切相关(r≥0.70,P <0.001)。大多数定性超声特征在观察者之间具有良好的一致性(Kappa 统计量 0.61-1.0,P < 0.001),(Kendall 系数 0.92,P < 0.001)。 结论 所研究的定性超声参数和 ATI 在诊断临床上显著的肝脂肪变性方面表现良好,但放射科医生的总体印象与组织学脂肪变性分级的相关性最好。我们的研究结果表明,尽管出现了更新的定量评估方法,但肝脏超声定性评估肝脂肪变性的作用仍在继续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hepatic steatosis: Qualitative and quantitative sonographic assessment in comparison to histology

Introduction

Globally, B-mode ultrasound is the most common modality used for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. We aimed to assess the correlation between qualitative liver ultrasound parameters, attenuation imaging (ATI) and histopathology-diagnosed steatosis grade obtained from liver biopsy. Our secondary aim was to examine the interobserver variability of qualitative ultrasound features.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed which included adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who had same-day liver ultrasound, ATI and liver biopsy for grading hepatic steatosis severity between 2018 and 2022. The qualitative US features for hepatic steatosis were independently scored by three radiologists and interobserver variability was examined. Histologic steatosis grade, ATI and qualitative ultrasound parameters were compared.

Results

Ninety patients were included; 67% female with a median age of 54 (IQR 39–65) years. The radiologist's overall impression had the highest correlation (very strongly correlated) with histologic steatosis grade (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). ATI coefficient and all qualitative ultrasound B-mode features except for liver echotexture and focal fat sparing were strongly correlated with histologic steatosis grade (r ≥ 0.70, P < 0.001). Most qualitative ultrasound features had good agreement between observers (Kappa statistic 0.61–1.0, P < 0.001), (Kendall coefficient 0.92, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The examined qualitative ultrasound parameters and ATI had good-excellent performance for diagnosing clinically significant hepatic steatosis; however, the radiologist's overall impression had the best correlation with histologic steatosis grade. Our findings suggest an ongoing role for qualitative liver ultrasound assessment of hepatic steatosis despite the emergence of newer quantitative measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The impact of ultrasound imaging on patient management – Let's practice the evidence EUS‐guided tissue acquisition from gastric subepithelial lesions—The optimal technique still remains undecided Ultrasound‐assisted and landmark‐based nusinersen delivery in spinal muscular atrophy adults: A retrospective analysis Cutaneous ultrasound in the diagnosis and assessment of inflammatory activity in tinea capitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1