评估 AF2 预测蛋白质结构组合的能力

IF 4.4 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Structure Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.str.2024.09.001
Jakob R. Riccabona, Fabian C. Spoendlin, Anna-Lena M. Fischer, Johannes R. Loeffler, Patrick K. Quoika, Timothy P. Jenkins, James A. Ferguson, Eva Smorodina, Andreas H. Laustsen, Victor Greiff, Stefano Forli, Andrew B. Ward, Charlotte M. Deane, Monica L. Fernández-Quintero
{"title":"评估 AF2 预测蛋白质结构组合的能力","authors":"Jakob R. Riccabona, Fabian C. Spoendlin, Anna-Lena M. Fischer, Johannes R. Loeffler, Patrick K. Quoika, Timothy P. Jenkins, James A. Ferguson, Eva Smorodina, Andreas H. Laustsen, Victor Greiff, Stefano Forli, Andrew B. Ward, Charlotte M. Deane, Monica L. Fernández-Quintero","doi":"10.1016/j.str.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent breakthroughs in protein structure prediction have enhanced the precision and speed at which protein configurations can be determined. Additionally, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations serve as a crucial tool for capturing the conformational space of proteins, providing valuable insights into their structural fluctuations. However, the scope of MD simulations is often limited by the accessible timescales and the computational resources available, posing challenges to comprehensively exploring protein behaviors. Recently emerging approaches have focused on expanding the capability of AlphaFold2 (AF2) to predict conformational substates of protein. Here, we benchmark the performance of various workflows that have adapted AF2 for ensemble prediction and compare the obtained structures with ensembles obtained from MD simulations and NMR. We provide an overview of the levels of performance and accessible timescales that can currently be achieved with machine learning (ML) based ensemble generation. Significant minima of the free energy surfaces remain undetected.","PeriodicalId":22168,"journal":{"name":"Structure","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing AF2’s ability to predict structural ensembles of proteins\",\"authors\":\"Jakob R. Riccabona, Fabian C. Spoendlin, Anna-Lena M. Fischer, Johannes R. Loeffler, Patrick K. Quoika, Timothy P. Jenkins, James A. Ferguson, Eva Smorodina, Andreas H. Laustsen, Victor Greiff, Stefano Forli, Andrew B. Ward, Charlotte M. Deane, Monica L. Fernández-Quintero\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.str.2024.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent breakthroughs in protein structure prediction have enhanced the precision and speed at which protein configurations can be determined. Additionally, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations serve as a crucial tool for capturing the conformational space of proteins, providing valuable insights into their structural fluctuations. However, the scope of MD simulations is often limited by the accessible timescales and the computational resources available, posing challenges to comprehensively exploring protein behaviors. Recently emerging approaches have focused on expanding the capability of AlphaFold2 (AF2) to predict conformational substates of protein. Here, we benchmark the performance of various workflows that have adapted AF2 for ensemble prediction and compare the obtained structures with ensembles obtained from MD simulations and NMR. We provide an overview of the levels of performance and accessible timescales that can currently be achieved with machine learning (ML) based ensemble generation. Significant minima of the free energy surfaces remain undetected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structure\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2024.09.001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structure","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2024.09.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蛋白质结构预测领域的最新突破提高了确定蛋白质构型的精度和速度。此外,分子动力学(MD)模拟是捕捉蛋白质构象空间的重要工具,为了解蛋白质的结构波动提供了宝贵的见解。然而,分子动力学模拟的范围往往受到可访问时间尺度和可用计算资源的限制,这给全面探索蛋白质行为带来了挑战。最近新出现的方法侧重于扩展 AlphaFold2(AF2)预测蛋白质构象亚态的能力。在此,我们将对采用 AF2 进行集合预测的各种工作流程的性能进行基准测试,并将获得的结构与通过 MD 模拟和 NMR 获得的集合进行比较。我们概述了目前基于机器学习(ML)的集合生成所能达到的性能水平和可访问的时间尺度。自由能表面的重要最小值仍未被发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing AF2’s ability to predict structural ensembles of proteins
Recent breakthroughs in protein structure prediction have enhanced the precision and speed at which protein configurations can be determined. Additionally, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations serve as a crucial tool for capturing the conformational space of proteins, providing valuable insights into their structural fluctuations. However, the scope of MD simulations is often limited by the accessible timescales and the computational resources available, posing challenges to comprehensively exploring protein behaviors. Recently emerging approaches have focused on expanding the capability of AlphaFold2 (AF2) to predict conformational substates of protein. Here, we benchmark the performance of various workflows that have adapted AF2 for ensemble prediction and compare the obtained structures with ensembles obtained from MD simulations and NMR. We provide an overview of the levels of performance and accessible timescales that can currently be achieved with machine learning (ML) based ensemble generation. Significant minima of the free energy surfaces remain undetected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structure
Structure 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
155
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Structure aims to publish papers of exceptional interest in the field of structural biology. The journal strives to be essential reading for structural biologists, as well as biologists and biochemists that are interested in macromolecular structure and function. Structure strongly encourages the submission of manuscripts that present structural and molecular insights into biological function and mechanism. Other reports that address fundamental questions in structural biology, such as structure-based examinations of protein evolution, folding, and/or design, will also be considered. We will consider the application of any method, experimental or computational, at high or low resolution, to conduct structural investigations, as long as the method is appropriate for the biological, functional, and mechanistic question(s) being addressed. Likewise, reports describing single-molecule analysis of biological mechanisms are welcome. In general, the editors encourage submission of experimental structural studies that are enriched by an analysis of structure-activity relationships and will not consider studies that solely report structural information unless the structure or analysis is of exceptional and broad interest. Studies reporting only homology models, de novo models, or molecular dynamics simulations are also discouraged unless the models are informed by or validated by novel experimental data; rationalization of a large body of existing experimental evidence and making testable predictions based on a model or simulation is often not considered sufficient.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the structural proteome of an Alzheimer’s disease rat brain model Protein translocation through α-helical channels and insertases The kinetoplastid kinetochore protein KKT23 acetyltransferase is a structural homolog of GCN5 that acetylates the histone H2A C-terminal tail Structure and dynamics of the active site of hen egg-white lysozyme from atomic resolution neutron crystallography Structural basis of signaling complex inhibition by IL-6 domain-swapped dimers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1