堆肥和辣木叶提取物生物刺激剂对利用菊苣修复金矿尾矿的协同效应

IF 2.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Scientific African Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02358
{"title":"堆肥和辣木叶提取物生物刺激剂对利用菊苣修复金矿尾矿的协同效应","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Phytoremediation is a cost-effective and environmentally friendly method for restoring degraded land. However, optimizing phytoremediation conditions and using locally sourced materials can further improve the sustainability of this approach. A 3×2×2 factorial design was used in determining the optimal parameters in the remediation of gold mine tailings using vetiver grass. The treatments consisted of three compost concentrations (0 %, 30 % and 60 %), two biostimulant types (laboratory-extracted and commercial biostimulants) and two application regimens (once and twice a week) in a randomized complete block design. The biomass and metal concentrations in the vetiver grass were measured after 16 weeks. All the vetiver that was planted in 0 % compost amendment died within four weeks regardless the MLE treatment. There was no significant difference in vetiver biomass between vetiver grown in 30 % and that grown in 60 % compost amendment. Biostimulant application frequency led to no significant differences. A difference on vetiver biomass due to the type of moringa leaf extract was eminent, with laboratory moringa leaf extract resulting in significantly higher biomass in vetiver grown on 60 % compost yet the commercial moringa leaf extract producing significantly higher vetiver biomass on vetiver grown on 30 % compost amendment. These findings suggest that the optimal combination for field study would be 30 % compost amendment with commercial biostimulant for a more cost-effective option.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic effect of compost and moringa leaf extract biostimulants on the remediation of gold mine tailings using chrysopogon zizanioides\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Phytoremediation is a cost-effective and environmentally friendly method for restoring degraded land. However, optimizing phytoremediation conditions and using locally sourced materials can further improve the sustainability of this approach. A 3×2×2 factorial design was used in determining the optimal parameters in the remediation of gold mine tailings using vetiver grass. The treatments consisted of three compost concentrations (0 %, 30 % and 60 %), two biostimulant types (laboratory-extracted and commercial biostimulants) and two application regimens (once and twice a week) in a randomized complete block design. The biomass and metal concentrations in the vetiver grass were measured after 16 weeks. All the vetiver that was planted in 0 % compost amendment died within four weeks regardless the MLE treatment. There was no significant difference in vetiver biomass between vetiver grown in 30 % and that grown in 60 % compost amendment. Biostimulant application frequency led to no significant differences. A difference on vetiver biomass due to the type of moringa leaf extract was eminent, with laboratory moringa leaf extract resulting in significantly higher biomass in vetiver grown on 60 % compost yet the commercial moringa leaf extract producing significantly higher vetiver biomass on vetiver grown on 30 % compost amendment. These findings suggest that the optimal combination for field study would be 30 % compost amendment with commercial biostimulant for a more cost-effective option.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific African\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific African\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227624003004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227624003004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物修复是恢复退化土地的一种具有成本效益且环保的方法。然而,优化植物修复条件和使用当地材料可以进一步提高这种方法的可持续性。在确定使用香根草修复金矿尾矿的最佳参数时,采用了 3×2×2 的因子设计。在随机完全区组设计中,处理包括三种堆肥浓度(0%、30% 和 60%)、两种生物刺激剂类型(实验室提取的生物刺激剂和商业生物刺激剂)和两种施用方案(每周一次和两次)。16 周后测量了香根草的生物量和金属浓度。在 0% 的堆肥添加剂中种植的香根草在四周内全部死亡,与 MLE 处理无关。在 30% 堆肥添加剂中种植的香根草与在 60% 堆肥添加剂中种植的香根草在生物量上没有明显差异。施用生物刺激剂的频率也没有显著差异。在 60% 的堆肥中生长的香根草的生物量明显高于在 60% 的堆肥中生长的香根草,而在 30% 的堆肥中生长的香根草的生物量明显高于在 30% 的堆肥中生长的香根草。这些研究结果表明,实地研究的最佳组合是 30% 的堆肥添加剂和商业生物刺激剂,以获得更具成本效益的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Synergistic effect of compost and moringa leaf extract biostimulants on the remediation of gold mine tailings using chrysopogon zizanioides
Phytoremediation is a cost-effective and environmentally friendly method for restoring degraded land. However, optimizing phytoremediation conditions and using locally sourced materials can further improve the sustainability of this approach. A 3×2×2 factorial design was used in determining the optimal parameters in the remediation of gold mine tailings using vetiver grass. The treatments consisted of three compost concentrations (0 %, 30 % and 60 %), two biostimulant types (laboratory-extracted and commercial biostimulants) and two application regimens (once and twice a week) in a randomized complete block design. The biomass and metal concentrations in the vetiver grass were measured after 16 weeks. All the vetiver that was planted in 0 % compost amendment died within four weeks regardless the MLE treatment. There was no significant difference in vetiver biomass between vetiver grown in 30 % and that grown in 60 % compost amendment. Biostimulant application frequency led to no significant differences. A difference on vetiver biomass due to the type of moringa leaf extract was eminent, with laboratory moringa leaf extract resulting in significantly higher biomass in vetiver grown on 60 % compost yet the commercial moringa leaf extract producing significantly higher vetiver biomass on vetiver grown on 30 % compost amendment. These findings suggest that the optimal combination for field study would be 30 % compost amendment with commercial biostimulant for a more cost-effective option.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Oil price shocks and human capital channels in Nigeria Determinants of an extended metric of agricultural commercialization in Ghana Molecular phylogenetic characterization of L-asparaginase-producing endophytic fungi inhabiting Prunus africana and Periploca linearifolia: Effect of incubation time and pH on enzyme production Improvement of the hygrothermal efficiency numerically using CFD modeling in a full-scale ventilated room with Moroccan climates Spatiotemporal climate variability and food security implications in the Central Ethiopia Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1