Pierre Murchan , Pilib Ó Broin , Anne-Marie Baird , Orla Sheils , Stephen P Finn
{"title":"利用 ComBat 对计算病理学中的机器学习应用进行深度特征批量校正","authors":"Pierre Murchan , Pilib Ó Broin , Anne-Marie Baird , Orla Sheils , Stephen P Finn","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Developing artificial intelligence (AI) models for digital pathology requires large datasets from multiple sources. However, without careful implementation, AI models risk learning confounding site-specific features in datasets instead of clinically relevant information, leading to overestimated performance, poor generalizability to real-world data, and potential misdiagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Whole-slide images (WSIs) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) colon (COAD), and stomach adenocarcinoma datasets were selected for inclusion in this study. Patch embeddings were obtained using three feature extraction models, followed by ComBat harmonization. Attention-based multiple instance learning models were trained to predict tissue-source site (TSS), as well as clinical and genetic attributes, using raw, Macenko normalized, and Combat-harmonized patch embeddings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TSS prediction achieved high accuracy (AUROC > 0.95) with all three feature extraction models. ComBat harmonization significantly reduced the AUROC for TSS prediction, with mean AUROCs dropping to approximately 0.5 for most models, indicating successful mitigation of batch effects (e.g., CCL-ResNet50 in TCGA-COAD: Pre-ComBat AUROC = 0.960, Post-ComBat AUROC = 0.506, <em>p <</em> 0.001). Clinical attributes associated with TSS, such as race and treatment response, showed decreased predictability post-harmonization. Notably, the prediction of genetic features like MSI status remained robust after harmonization (e.g., MSI in TCGA-COAD: Pre-ComBat AUROC = 0.667, Post-ComBat AUROC = 0.669, <em>p</em>=0.952), indicating the preservation of true histological signals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ComBat harmonization of deep learning-derived histology features effectively reduces the risk of AI models learning confounding features in WSIs, ensuring more reliable performance estimates. This approach is promising for the integration of large-scale digital pathology datasets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep feature batch correction using ComBat for machine learning applications in computational pathology\",\"authors\":\"Pierre Murchan , Pilib Ó Broin , Anne-Marie Baird , Orla Sheils , Stephen P Finn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Developing artificial intelligence (AI) models for digital pathology requires large datasets from multiple sources. However, without careful implementation, AI models risk learning confounding site-specific features in datasets instead of clinically relevant information, leading to overestimated performance, poor generalizability to real-world data, and potential misdiagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Whole-slide images (WSIs) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) colon (COAD), and stomach adenocarcinoma datasets were selected for inclusion in this study. Patch embeddings were obtained using three feature extraction models, followed by ComBat harmonization. Attention-based multiple instance learning models were trained to predict tissue-source site (TSS), as well as clinical and genetic attributes, using raw, Macenko normalized, and Combat-harmonized patch embeddings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TSS prediction achieved high accuracy (AUROC > 0.95) with all three feature extraction models. ComBat harmonization significantly reduced the AUROC for TSS prediction, with mean AUROCs dropping to approximately 0.5 for most models, indicating successful mitigation of batch effects (e.g., CCL-ResNet50 in TCGA-COAD: Pre-ComBat AUROC = 0.960, Post-ComBat AUROC = 0.506, <em>p <</em> 0.001). Clinical attributes associated with TSS, such as race and treatment response, showed decreased predictability post-harmonization. Notably, the prediction of genetic features like MSI status remained robust after harmonization (e.g., MSI in TCGA-COAD: Pre-ComBat AUROC = 0.667, Post-ComBat AUROC = 0.669, <em>p</em>=0.952), indicating the preservation of true histological signals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ComBat harmonization of deep learning-derived histology features effectively reduces the risk of AI models learning confounding features in WSIs, ensuring more reliable performance estimates. This approach is promising for the integration of large-scale digital pathology datasets.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S215335392400035X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S215335392400035X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景为数字病理学开发人工智能(AI)模型需要来自多个来源的大型数据集。然而,如果不仔细实施,人工智能模型就有可能学习数据集中的混杂部位特异性特征,而不是临床相关信息,从而导致性能被高估、对真实世界数据的普适性差以及潜在的误诊。使用三种特征提取模型获得斑块嵌入,然后进行 ComBat 协调。使用原始、Macenko 归一化和 Combat 协调的斑块嵌入,训练了基于注意力的多实例学习模型,以预测组织来源部位(TSS)以及临床和遗传属性。ComBat 协调大大降低了 TSS 预测的 AUROC,大多数模型的平均 AUROC 降至 0.5 左右,这表明批次效应得到了成功缓解(例如,TCGA-COAD 中的 CCL-ResNet50 模型,其平均 AUROC 降至 0.5 左右):CCL-ResNet50 in TCGA-COAD:Pre-ComBat AUROC = 0.960, Post-ComBat AUROC = 0.506, p < 0.001)。与 TSS 相关的临床属性(如种族和治疗反应)在协调后的可预测性有所下降。值得注意的是,MSI 状态等遗传特征的预测能力在协调后仍然很强(例如,TCGA-COAD 中的 MSI:ConclusionComBat harmonization of deep learning-derived histology features effectively reduces the risk of AI models learning confounding features in WSIs, ensuring more reliable performance estimates.这种方法在整合大规模数字病理数据集方面大有可为。
Deep feature batch correction using ComBat for machine learning applications in computational pathology
Background
Developing artificial intelligence (AI) models for digital pathology requires large datasets from multiple sources. However, without careful implementation, AI models risk learning confounding site-specific features in datasets instead of clinically relevant information, leading to overestimated performance, poor generalizability to real-world data, and potential misdiagnosis.
Methods
Whole-slide images (WSIs) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) colon (COAD), and stomach adenocarcinoma datasets were selected for inclusion in this study. Patch embeddings were obtained using three feature extraction models, followed by ComBat harmonization. Attention-based multiple instance learning models were trained to predict tissue-source site (TSS), as well as clinical and genetic attributes, using raw, Macenko normalized, and Combat-harmonized patch embeddings.
Results
TSS prediction achieved high accuracy (AUROC > 0.95) with all three feature extraction models. ComBat harmonization significantly reduced the AUROC for TSS prediction, with mean AUROCs dropping to approximately 0.5 for most models, indicating successful mitigation of batch effects (e.g., CCL-ResNet50 in TCGA-COAD: Pre-ComBat AUROC = 0.960, Post-ComBat AUROC = 0.506, p < 0.001). Clinical attributes associated with TSS, such as race and treatment response, showed decreased predictability post-harmonization. Notably, the prediction of genetic features like MSI status remained robust after harmonization (e.g., MSI in TCGA-COAD: Pre-ComBat AUROC = 0.667, Post-ComBat AUROC = 0.669, p=0.952), indicating the preservation of true histological signals.
Conclusion
ComBat harmonization of deep learning-derived histology features effectively reduces the risk of AI models learning confounding features in WSIs, ensuring more reliable performance estimates. This approach is promising for the integration of large-scale digital pathology datasets.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.