利用贝叶斯潜类分析法评估用于诊断狗患猪布鲁氏杆菌的三种血清检验方法

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Preventive veterinary medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106345
Catherine C. Kneipp , Ronald Coilparampil , Mark Westman , Monica Suann , Jennifer Robson , Simon M. Firestone , Richard Malik , Siobhan M. Mor , Mark A. Stevenson , Anke K. Wiethoelter
{"title":"利用贝叶斯潜类分析法评估用于诊断狗患猪布鲁氏杆菌的三种血清检验方法","authors":"Catherine C. Kneipp ,&nbsp;Ronald Coilparampil ,&nbsp;Mark Westman ,&nbsp;Monica Suann ,&nbsp;Jennifer Robson ,&nbsp;Simon M. Firestone ,&nbsp;Richard Malik ,&nbsp;Siobhan M. Mor ,&nbsp;Mark A. Stevenson ,&nbsp;Anke K. Wiethoelter","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Brucella suis</em> infection of dogs is an emerging issue worldwide requiring specific management to address zoonotic risks and animal welfare concerns. Diagnosis in dogs is routinely based on serological testing, but to date these tests have only been validated for use in production animal species and humans. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of three commonly used serological tests in dogs. Canine sera (n = 989) were tested with the Rose Bengal rapid plate agglutination test (RBRPT), the complement fixation test (CFT) and a competitive ELISA (C-ELISA). Diagnostic test performance was evaluated using a three test, two population Bayesian latent class analysis accounting for conditional dependence between the three tests. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated for a range of expected prevalence estimates for the individual tests and test combinations interpreted in series and parallel. The RBRPT showed the highest individual Se of 0.902 (95 % posterior credible interval [PCI] 0.759–0.978) and the CFT the highest individual diagnostic specificity (Sp) of 0.914 (95 % PCI 0.886–0.946). The C-ELISA had marginally the best overall diagnostic performance (Youden’s index = 0.807). The CFT and the C-ELISA interpreted in parallel returned the highest combined Se and Sp (0.988 and 0.885, respectively). All tests returned NPVs of &gt; 0.982 in 2–8 % prevalence settings. Series interpretation of the three-test combination as well as the two-test combinations of the RBRPT and the C-ELISA and the CFT and the C-ELISA produced a PPV of 0.502 when the estimated prevalence was 8 %. While all tests are suitable for the detection of <em>B. suis</em> antibodies in dogs, they should not be interpreted in isolation as their diagnostic value is dependent on the pre-test probability of the disease. As such they are useful tools for the diagnosis of <em>B. suis</em> in dogs when exposure, history and clinical presentation indicate a risk of brucellosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 106345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of three serological tests for the diagnosis of Brucella suis in dogs using Bayesian latent class analysis\",\"authors\":\"Catherine C. Kneipp ,&nbsp;Ronald Coilparampil ,&nbsp;Mark Westman ,&nbsp;Monica Suann ,&nbsp;Jennifer Robson ,&nbsp;Simon M. Firestone ,&nbsp;Richard Malik ,&nbsp;Siobhan M. Mor ,&nbsp;Mark A. Stevenson ,&nbsp;Anke K. Wiethoelter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Brucella suis</em> infection of dogs is an emerging issue worldwide requiring specific management to address zoonotic risks and animal welfare concerns. Diagnosis in dogs is routinely based on serological testing, but to date these tests have only been validated for use in production animal species and humans. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of three commonly used serological tests in dogs. Canine sera (n = 989) were tested with the Rose Bengal rapid plate agglutination test (RBRPT), the complement fixation test (CFT) and a competitive ELISA (C-ELISA). Diagnostic test performance was evaluated using a three test, two population Bayesian latent class analysis accounting for conditional dependence between the three tests. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated for a range of expected prevalence estimates for the individual tests and test combinations interpreted in series and parallel. The RBRPT showed the highest individual Se of 0.902 (95 % posterior credible interval [PCI] 0.759–0.978) and the CFT the highest individual diagnostic specificity (Sp) of 0.914 (95 % PCI 0.886–0.946). The C-ELISA had marginally the best overall diagnostic performance (Youden’s index = 0.807). The CFT and the C-ELISA interpreted in parallel returned the highest combined Se and Sp (0.988 and 0.885, respectively). All tests returned NPVs of &gt; 0.982 in 2–8 % prevalence settings. Series interpretation of the three-test combination as well as the two-test combinations of the RBRPT and the C-ELISA and the CFT and the C-ELISA produced a PPV of 0.502 when the estimated prevalence was 8 %. While all tests are suitable for the detection of <em>B. suis</em> antibodies in dogs, they should not be interpreted in isolation as their diagnostic value is dependent on the pre-test probability of the disease. As such they are useful tools for the diagnosis of <em>B. suis</em> in dogs when exposure, history and clinical presentation indicate a risk of brucellosis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive veterinary medicine\",\"volume\":\"233 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive veterinary medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587724002319\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587724002319","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

狗感染布鲁氏菌是全球范围内一个新出现的问题,需要采取专门的管理措施来应对人畜共患病风险和动物福利问题。狗的诊断通常以血清学检测为基础,但迄今为止,这些检测仅在生产动物物种和人类中得到验证。本研究旨在评估狗的三种常用血清学检测方法的诊断性能。用玫瑰孟加拉快速平板凝集试验(RBRPT)、补体固定试验(CFT)和竞争性酶联免疫吸附试验(C-ELISA)对犬血清(n = 989)进行了检测。诊断检测性能的评估采用了三项检测、两种人群贝叶斯潜类分析法,并考虑了三项检测之间的条件依赖性。计算了单项检测和串联与并联检测组合的一系列预期流行率估计值的阳性预测值和阴性预测值(PPV、NPV)。RBRPT 的单项 Se 值最高,为 0.902(95 % 可信区间 [PCI] 0.759-0.978),CFT 的单项诊断特异性 (Sp) 最高,为 0.914(95 % 可信区间 [PCI] 0.886-0.946)。C-ELISA的总体诊断性能稍好一些(尤登指数=0.807)。同时解读的 CFT 和 C-ELISA 的综合 Se 和 Sp 值最高(分别为 0.988 和 0.885)。在发病率为 2-8% 的情况下,所有检测的净现值均为 > 0.982。当估计流行率为 8% 时,三项检测组合以及 RBRPT 和 C-ELISA 两项检测组合、CFT 和 C-ELISA 两项检测组合的系列解释产生的 PPV 为 0.502。虽然所有检测方法都适用于检测犬的猪蓝耳病抗体,但它们的诊断价值取决于检测前的患病概率,因此不应孤立地进行解释。因此,当接触、病史和临床表现表明狗有感染布鲁氏菌病的风险时,它们是诊断布鲁氏菌病的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of three serological tests for the diagnosis of Brucella suis in dogs using Bayesian latent class analysis
Brucella suis infection of dogs is an emerging issue worldwide requiring specific management to address zoonotic risks and animal welfare concerns. Diagnosis in dogs is routinely based on serological testing, but to date these tests have only been validated for use in production animal species and humans. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of three commonly used serological tests in dogs. Canine sera (n = 989) were tested with the Rose Bengal rapid plate agglutination test (RBRPT), the complement fixation test (CFT) and a competitive ELISA (C-ELISA). Diagnostic test performance was evaluated using a three test, two population Bayesian latent class analysis accounting for conditional dependence between the three tests. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated for a range of expected prevalence estimates for the individual tests and test combinations interpreted in series and parallel. The RBRPT showed the highest individual Se of 0.902 (95 % posterior credible interval [PCI] 0.759–0.978) and the CFT the highest individual diagnostic specificity (Sp) of 0.914 (95 % PCI 0.886–0.946). The C-ELISA had marginally the best overall diagnostic performance (Youden’s index = 0.807). The CFT and the C-ELISA interpreted in parallel returned the highest combined Se and Sp (0.988 and 0.885, respectively). All tests returned NPVs of > 0.982 in 2–8 % prevalence settings. Series interpretation of the three-test combination as well as the two-test combinations of the RBRPT and the C-ELISA and the CFT and the C-ELISA produced a PPV of 0.502 when the estimated prevalence was 8 %. While all tests are suitable for the detection of B. suis antibodies in dogs, they should not be interpreted in isolation as their diagnostic value is dependent on the pre-test probability of the disease. As such they are useful tools for the diagnosis of B. suis in dogs when exposure, history and clinical presentation indicate a risk of brucellosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive veterinary medicine
Preventive veterinary medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on: Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals; Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases; Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology; Disease and infection control or eradication measures; The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment; Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis; Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.
期刊最新文献
A dynamic framework for calculating the biomass of fattening pigs with an application in estimating the burden of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome in the Netherlands. Lifetime health care costs for dogs based on data from seven veterinary clinics in Denmark. The global prevalence of microsporidia infection in rabbits as a neglected public health concern: A systematic review and meta-analysis Operational lessons learned from simulating an elimination response to a transboundary animal disease in wild animals. Economic assessment of animal disease burden in Senegalese small ruminants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1