全球价值链的参与和地位会带来新兴经济体的创新吗?来自印度制造业的行业层面证据

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114989
Rahul Thakur, Sakshi Sharma
{"title":"全球价值链的参与和地位会带来新兴经济体的创新吗?来自印度制造业的行业层面证据","authors":"Rahul Thakur,&nbsp;Sakshi Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the relationship between global value chain (GVC) embeddedness (participation and position) and innovation performance in India using data from the TiVA database for 14 manufacturing industries over the period 2009–2018. To account for the endogeneity issue arising due to reverse causality, the study employs a two-step system GMM. Empirical results show that GVC participation and position both significantly positively affect innovation performance, measured by the number of patent applications filed. However, participation has an inverted U-shaped impact. We contribute to the existing literature by further splitting GVC participation into forward and backward participations and finding that only forward GVC participation significantly impacts an emerging country’s innovation performance. These findings suggest that policymakers in emerging countries should prioritize improving GVC position through increased R&amp;D expenditures rather than relying solely on excessive GVC participation for enhancing innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 114989"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does global value chain participation and position lead to innovation in an emerging economy? Industry-level evidence from Indian manufacturing industries\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Thakur,&nbsp;Sakshi Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the relationship between global value chain (GVC) embeddedness (participation and position) and innovation performance in India using data from the TiVA database for 14 manufacturing industries over the period 2009–2018. To account for the endogeneity issue arising due to reverse causality, the study employs a two-step system GMM. Empirical results show that GVC participation and position both significantly positively affect innovation performance, measured by the number of patent applications filed. However, participation has an inverted U-shaped impact. We contribute to the existing literature by further splitting GVC participation into forward and backward participations and finding that only forward GVC participation significantly impacts an emerging country’s innovation performance. These findings suggest that policymakers in emerging countries should prioritize improving GVC position through increased R&amp;D expenditures rather than relying solely on excessive GVC participation for enhancing innovation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324004934\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324004934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用 TiVA 数据库中 2009-2018 年间 14 个制造业的数据,研究了全球价值链嵌入度(参与度和地位)与印度创新绩效之间的关系。为考虑反向因果关系导致的内生性问题,研究采用了两步系统 GMM。实证结果表明,全球价值链的参与度和地位都会对以专利申请数量衡量的创新绩效产生显著的正向影响。然而,参与度的影响呈倒 U 型。我们进一步将全球价值链参与分为前向参与和后向参与,发现只有前向全球价值链参与对新兴国家的创新绩效有显著影响,从而为现有文献做出了贡献。这些发现表明,新兴国家的政策制定者应优先考虑通过增加研发支出来提高全球价值链地位,而不是仅仅依靠过度参与全球价值链来提高创新能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does global value chain participation and position lead to innovation in an emerging economy? Industry-level evidence from Indian manufacturing industries
This study examines the relationship between global value chain (GVC) embeddedness (participation and position) and innovation performance in India using data from the TiVA database for 14 manufacturing industries over the period 2009–2018. To account for the endogeneity issue arising due to reverse causality, the study employs a two-step system GMM. Empirical results show that GVC participation and position both significantly positively affect innovation performance, measured by the number of patent applications filed. However, participation has an inverted U-shaped impact. We contribute to the existing literature by further splitting GVC participation into forward and backward participations and finding that only forward GVC participation significantly impacts an emerging country’s innovation performance. These findings suggest that policymakers in emerging countries should prioritize improving GVC position through increased R&D expenditures rather than relying solely on excessive GVC participation for enhancing innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights Editorial Board Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label Agility in marketing teams: An analysis of factors influencing the entry decision into a trendy social network Socio-politically silent brands: A double edged sword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1