{"title":"俄罗斯乌克兰战争中的和平路障","authors":"Anna Batta","doi":"10.1016/j.orbis.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The strategic imperative for a resolution of the Russia-Ukraine War requires that we combine the military and diplomatic instruments of power to accomplish first a cease fire and then a lasting peace. This article traces the development of peace negotiations prior to the outbreak of the war and offers possible lessons that could inform policymakers today. The main argument is that negotiations prior to the invasion were primarily at a standstill because of the way in which the parties interpreted the conflict and how each saw possible ways of conflict resolution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45433,"journal":{"name":"Orbis","volume":"68 4","pages":"Pages 666-676"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roadblocks to Peace in Russia’s War in Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"Anna Batta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orbis.2024.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The strategic imperative for a resolution of the Russia-Ukraine War requires that we combine the military and diplomatic instruments of power to accomplish first a cease fire and then a lasting peace. This article traces the development of peace negotiations prior to the outbreak of the war and offers possible lessons that could inform policymakers today. The main argument is that negotiations prior to the invasion were primarily at a standstill because of the way in which the parties interpreted the conflict and how each saw possible ways of conflict resolution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orbis\",\"volume\":\"68 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 666-676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orbis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030438724000541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030438724000541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
The strategic imperative for a resolution of the Russia-Ukraine War requires that we combine the military and diplomatic instruments of power to accomplish first a cease fire and then a lasting peace. This article traces the development of peace negotiations prior to the outbreak of the war and offers possible lessons that could inform policymakers today. The main argument is that negotiations prior to the invasion were primarily at a standstill because of the way in which the parties interpreted the conflict and how each saw possible ways of conflict resolution.
期刊介绍:
Orbis, the Foreign Policy Research Institute quarterly journal of world affairs, was founded in 1957 as a forum for policymakers, scholars, and the informed public who sought an engaging, thought-provoking debate beyond the predictable, conventional journals of that time. Nearly half a century later, Orbis continues to offer informative, insightful, and lively discourse on the full range of topics relating to American foreign policy and national security, as well as in-depth analysis on important international developments. Orbis readers always know the stories behind the headlines.