照射 BALB/c 小鼠时常见挥发性和注射性麻醉药物对外周血的遗传毒性效应和氧化应激作用

IF 1.7 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101127
Chongyu Yang , Althaf Hussain Shaik , Turki Mayudh Alrubie , Yanxi Zhang
{"title":"照射 BALB/c 小鼠时常见挥发性和注射性麻醉药物对外周血的遗传毒性效应和氧化应激作用","authors":"Chongyu Yang ,&nbsp;Althaf Hussain Shaik ,&nbsp;Turki Mayudh Alrubie ,&nbsp;Yanxi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ionizing radiation (IR) is well-known for its genotoxic and cytotoxic effects. Additionally, anesthesia has been shown to cause various side effects, including genotoxicity. This study aims to evaluate the DNA damage and oxidative stress resulting from exposure to both anesthesia and IR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seventy BALB/c male mice were divided into 14 identical groups and anesthetized using three different inhalation anesthetics (isoflurane, sevoflurane, and halothane) and three different injectable anesthetics (propofol, ketamine, and thiopental). We also evaluated combinations of these anesthetic drugs with 1 Gy IR. DNA damage in white blood cells was assessed using the alkaline comet assay at 0, 2, and 24 h after treatment. Additionally, oxidative stress in blood samples was measured 6 h post-treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The percentage of DNA in the tail and fragmented nuclei after 2 and 24 h was significantly higher in the groups given volatile anesthetics compared to the propofol and thiopental groups (<em>P&lt;0.05</em>). Furthermore, oxidative stress levels were also significantly higher in the volatile anesthetic groups (<em>P&lt;0.05</em>). When combined with IR, the volatile anesthetics and ketamine resulted in increased genotoxicity and significantly higher oxidative stress compared to the group exposed only to IR (<em>P&lt;0.05</em>). In contrast, propofol and thiopental did not lead to a significant increase in genotoxicity or oxidative stress compared to the control group (<em>P&gt;0.07</em>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Combining volatile anesthetic drugs and ketamine with 1 Gy irradiation resulted in higher levels of toxic effects and oxidative stress, although this combination did not produce a synergistic effect. Additionally, the combination of propofol and thiopental with IR did not show a significant difference compared to the irradiated-only group in both the alkaline comet and oxidative stress assays.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","volume":"17 4","pages":"Article 101127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The genotoxicity effects and oxidative stress of common volatile and injectable anesthesia drugs on peripheral blood during irradiation of BALB/c mice\",\"authors\":\"Chongyu Yang ,&nbsp;Althaf Hussain Shaik ,&nbsp;Turki Mayudh Alrubie ,&nbsp;Yanxi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ionizing radiation (IR) is well-known for its genotoxic and cytotoxic effects. Additionally, anesthesia has been shown to cause various side effects, including genotoxicity. This study aims to evaluate the DNA damage and oxidative stress resulting from exposure to both anesthesia and IR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seventy BALB/c male mice were divided into 14 identical groups and anesthetized using three different inhalation anesthetics (isoflurane, sevoflurane, and halothane) and three different injectable anesthetics (propofol, ketamine, and thiopental). We also evaluated combinations of these anesthetic drugs with 1 Gy IR. DNA damage in white blood cells was assessed using the alkaline comet assay at 0, 2, and 24 h after treatment. Additionally, oxidative stress in blood samples was measured 6 h post-treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The percentage of DNA in the tail and fragmented nuclei after 2 and 24 h was significantly higher in the groups given volatile anesthetics compared to the propofol and thiopental groups (<em>P&lt;0.05</em>). Furthermore, oxidative stress levels were also significantly higher in the volatile anesthetic groups (<em>P&lt;0.05</em>). When combined with IR, the volatile anesthetics and ketamine resulted in increased genotoxicity and significantly higher oxidative stress compared to the group exposed only to IR (<em>P&lt;0.05</em>). In contrast, propofol and thiopental did not lead to a significant increase in genotoxicity or oxidative stress compared to the control group (<em>P&gt;0.07</em>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Combining volatile anesthetic drugs and ketamine with 1 Gy irradiation resulted in higher levels of toxic effects and oxidative stress, although this combination did not produce a synergistic effect. Additionally, the combination of propofol and thiopental with IR did not show a significant difference compared to the irradiated-only group in both the alkaline comet and oxidative stress assays.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S168785072400311X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S168785072400311X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言电离辐射(IR)以其基因毒性和细胞毒性作用而闻名。此外,麻醉也被证明会导致各种副作用,包括基因毒性。方法将 70 只 BALB/c 雄性小鼠分成 14 个相同的组,使用三种不同的吸入麻醉剂(异氟烷、七氟烷和氟烷)和三种不同的注射麻醉剂(异丙酚、氯胺酮和硫喷妥类)进行麻醉。我们还对这些麻醉药物与 1 Gy IR 的组合进行了评估。在治疗后 0、2 和 24 小时,我们使用碱性彗星试验评估了白细胞的 DNA 损伤情况。结果与异丙酚组和硫喷妥组相比,挥发性麻醉剂组在 2 和 24 小时后尾部 DNA 的百分比和细胞核碎片的百分比明显更高(P<0.05)。此外,挥发性麻醉剂组的氧化应激水平也明显更高(P<0.05)。与仅暴露于红外线的组别相比,挥发性麻醉剂和氯胺酮与红外线结合使用时,会导致基因毒性增加,氧化应激水平明显升高(P<0.05)。结论将挥发性麻醉药物和氯胺酮与 1 Gy 辐照结合使用会导致更高水平的毒性效应和氧化应激,尽管这种结合不会产生协同效应。此外,在碱性彗星试验和氧化应激试验中,异丙酚和硫喷妥同红外线照射组与单纯照射组相比没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The genotoxicity effects and oxidative stress of common volatile and injectable anesthesia drugs on peripheral blood during irradiation of BALB/c mice

Introduction

Ionizing radiation (IR) is well-known for its genotoxic and cytotoxic effects. Additionally, anesthesia has been shown to cause various side effects, including genotoxicity. This study aims to evaluate the DNA damage and oxidative stress resulting from exposure to both anesthesia and IR.

Methods

Seventy BALB/c male mice were divided into 14 identical groups and anesthetized using three different inhalation anesthetics (isoflurane, sevoflurane, and halothane) and three different injectable anesthetics (propofol, ketamine, and thiopental). We also evaluated combinations of these anesthetic drugs with 1 Gy IR. DNA damage in white blood cells was assessed using the alkaline comet assay at 0, 2, and 24 h after treatment. Additionally, oxidative stress in blood samples was measured 6 h post-treatment.

Results

The percentage of DNA in the tail and fragmented nuclei after 2 and 24 h was significantly higher in the groups given volatile anesthetics compared to the propofol and thiopental groups (P<0.05). Furthermore, oxidative stress levels were also significantly higher in the volatile anesthetic groups (P<0.05). When combined with IR, the volatile anesthetics and ketamine resulted in increased genotoxicity and significantly higher oxidative stress compared to the group exposed only to IR (P<0.05). In contrast, propofol and thiopental did not lead to a significant increase in genotoxicity or oxidative stress compared to the control group (P>0.07).

Conclusion

Combining volatile anesthetic drugs and ketamine with 1 Gy irradiation resulted in higher levels of toxic effects and oxidative stress, although this combination did not produce a synergistic effect. Additionally, the combination of propofol and thiopental with IR did not show a significant difference compared to the irradiated-only group in both the alkaline comet and oxidative stress assays.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and applications of nuclear, radiation and isotopes in biology, medicine, drugs, biochemistry, microbiology, agriculture, entomology, food technology, chemistry, physics, solid states, engineering, environmental and applied sciences.
期刊最新文献
Entropy optimization and Joule heating in Darcy-Forchheimer fluid flow past a moving needle with variable thermal conductivity and radiation effects Recycling of cathode-ray tube screen glasses using Na2CO3: Structural properties and transmission resistance against charged radiation and neutron Perceptions of artificial intelligence among computed tomography technologists in Saudi Arabia: Influence of demographics and training on AI adoption Optimizing radiative flow of trihybrid nanofluid with autocatalytic chemical reaction using Cattaneo-Christove heat flux model for industrial heat transfer applications From awareness to integration: Mobile applications as tools in radiology education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1