基于代理的移动即服务(MaaS)模拟建模框架

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101294
{"title":"基于代理的移动即服务(MaaS)模拟建模框架","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study develops an agent-based intelligent Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) simulation model consisting of three types of agents (i.e., MaaS fleet unit, travelers, and central intelligent mobility assignment module) to assess mobility service assignment processes balancing conflicting entities (e.g., demand and supply) within the MaaS ecosystem. The study follows a two-level optimization method (i.e., lower, and upper levels). It employs artificial intelligence and multicriteria decision making to solve two-dimensional mobility assignment problems (demand vs. supply). The novelty of this assignment process is that it implements an intelligence module accounting for the past system performance to make a future assignment decision in favor of both sides of the operation. This study processes 24-hour trip requests extracted from Nova Scotia Travel Activity (NovaTRAC) survey data in real-time. Two scenarios (1-D and 2-D assignments) are compared using the cost criteria, such as total waiting time, empty time, and idle time. The 1-D scenario refers to mobility assignment that emphasizes the demand side only, and the 2-D scenario formulates mobility assignment by balancing the demand and supply sides of the MaaS ecosystem. Experimental results indicate that a MaaS fleet of 350 units is the most balanced fleet in both scenarios. However, the 2-D optimization method reduces the overall supply cost by 25%. Moreover, 2-D operation demonstrates a higher fleet utilization over a considerable period, whereas the 1-D design guarantees a higher fleet utilization only during the peak period. Results of this study provide us with a benchmark for assessing more complex MaaS operation scenarios which will further aid in advancing the operational MaaS ecosystem. Our findings can help policymakers implement cost-effective MaaS solutions supporting sustainable urban mobility and SDG 13: Climate Action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An agent-based simulation modeling framework for Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study develops an agent-based intelligent Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) simulation model consisting of three types of agents (i.e., MaaS fleet unit, travelers, and central intelligent mobility assignment module) to assess mobility service assignment processes balancing conflicting entities (e.g., demand and supply) within the MaaS ecosystem. The study follows a two-level optimization method (i.e., lower, and upper levels). It employs artificial intelligence and multicriteria decision making to solve two-dimensional mobility assignment problems (demand vs. supply). The novelty of this assignment process is that it implements an intelligence module accounting for the past system performance to make a future assignment decision in favor of both sides of the operation. This study processes 24-hour trip requests extracted from Nova Scotia Travel Activity (NovaTRAC) survey data in real-time. Two scenarios (1-D and 2-D assignments) are compared using the cost criteria, such as total waiting time, empty time, and idle time. The 1-D scenario refers to mobility assignment that emphasizes the demand side only, and the 2-D scenario formulates mobility assignment by balancing the demand and supply sides of the MaaS ecosystem. Experimental results indicate that a MaaS fleet of 350 units is the most balanced fleet in both scenarios. However, the 2-D optimization method reduces the overall supply cost by 25%. Moreover, 2-D operation demonstrates a higher fleet utilization over a considerable period, whereas the 1-D design guarantees a higher fleet utilization only during the peak period. Results of this study provide us with a benchmark for assessing more complex MaaS operation scenarios which will further aid in advancing the operational MaaS ecosystem. Our findings can help policymakers implement cost-effective MaaS solutions supporting sustainable urban mobility and SDG 13: Climate Action.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24001494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24001494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究开发了一种基于代理的智能移动即服务(MaaS)仿真模型,该模型由三类代理(即 MaaS 车队、旅行者和中央智能移动分配模块)组成,用于评估移动服务分配过程,以平衡 MaaS 生态系统中相互冲突的实体(如需求和供给)。本研究采用两级优化方法(即下级和上级)。它采用人工智能和多标准决策来解决二维移动分配问题(需求与供给)。该分配流程的新颖之处在于,它实施了一个智能模块,考虑到过去的系统性能,做出有利于运营双方的未来分配决策。本研究实时处理从新斯科舍省出行活动(NovaTRAC)调查数据中提取的 24 小时出行请求。使用总等待时间、空车时间和空闲时间等成本标准对两种方案(1-D 和 2-D 分配)进行了比较。1-D 方案指的是只强调需求方的移动分配,而 2-D 方案则通过平衡 MaaS 生态系统的需求方和供应方来制定移动分配。实验结果表明,由 350 个单位组成的 MaaS 车队是两种方案中最平衡的车队。然而,二维优化方法将总体供应成本降低了 25%。此外,2-D 运行在相当长的时间内都能提高车队的利用率,而 1-D 设计只能保证在高峰期提高车队的利用率。这项研究的结果为我们提供了评估更复杂的 MaaS 运营场景的基准,这将进一步帮助推进可运营的 MaaS 生态系统。我们的研究结果可以帮助决策者实施具有成本效益的 MaaS 解决方案,支持可持续城市交通和可持续发展目标 13:气候行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An agent-based simulation modeling framework for Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS)
This study develops an agent-based intelligent Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) simulation model consisting of three types of agents (i.e., MaaS fleet unit, travelers, and central intelligent mobility assignment module) to assess mobility service assignment processes balancing conflicting entities (e.g., demand and supply) within the MaaS ecosystem. The study follows a two-level optimization method (i.e., lower, and upper levels). It employs artificial intelligence and multicriteria decision making to solve two-dimensional mobility assignment problems (demand vs. supply). The novelty of this assignment process is that it implements an intelligence module accounting for the past system performance to make a future assignment decision in favor of both sides of the operation. This study processes 24-hour trip requests extracted from Nova Scotia Travel Activity (NovaTRAC) survey data in real-time. Two scenarios (1-D and 2-D assignments) are compared using the cost criteria, such as total waiting time, empty time, and idle time. The 1-D scenario refers to mobility assignment that emphasizes the demand side only, and the 2-D scenario formulates mobility assignment by balancing the demand and supply sides of the MaaS ecosystem. Experimental results indicate that a MaaS fleet of 350 units is the most balanced fleet in both scenarios. However, the 2-D optimization method reduces the overall supply cost by 25%. Moreover, 2-D operation demonstrates a higher fleet utilization over a considerable period, whereas the 1-D design guarantees a higher fleet utilization only during the peak period. Results of this study provide us with a benchmark for assessing more complex MaaS operation scenarios which will further aid in advancing the operational MaaS ecosystem. Our findings can help policymakers implement cost-effective MaaS solutions supporting sustainable urban mobility and SDG 13: Climate Action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
Fuelling the pandemic: The impact of fuel prices on COVID-19 COVID-19 and its influence on the propensity to work from home between March 2020 and June 2021 Simulation modeling of passengers flow at airport terminals to reduce delay and enhance level of service Optimization of transport sustainability index to conserve resources: A case study of Delhi, India The effect of airline service quality, perceived value, emotional attachment, and brand loyalty on passengers’ willingness to pay: The moderating role of airline origin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1