作为斗争领域的科学:从事森林治理研究的非洲学者的性别经验

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS Forest Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103339
Olena Strelnyk , Susanne Koch , Camilla Tetley , Shizuku Sunagawa , Amani J. Uisso
{"title":"作为斗争领域的科学:从事森林治理研究的非洲学者的性别经验","authors":"Olena Strelnyk ,&nbsp;Susanne Koch ,&nbsp;Camilla Tetley ,&nbsp;Shizuku Sunagawa ,&nbsp;Amani J. Uisso","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building on scholarship addressing gender inequality in forestry, this paper investigates how African scholars experience gendered struggles in doing forest governance research. Employing Bourdieu's theoretical lens of science as a (gendered) social field of struggle, we consider scholars' participation in academia as shaped by dispositions related to gender, locality and other social dimensions of difference. Based on interviews with twenty female and male scholars affiliated with research organisations in African countries, we examine how these dispositions affect their experiences as academics in forest governance research. Therefore, we adopt an integrative interpretative approach to interview analysis focusing on narratives, positionings and discursive dynamics.</div><div>We present our empirical results according to two core themes: gendered experiences of struggle in reconciling family commitments with the requirements of scientific productivity and mobility; and gendered experiences of struggle related to doing science in male-dominated research environments. The study reveals that African women scholars in the field encounter specific difficulties in meeting the requirements of scientific productivity and mobility due to patriarchal gender orders. Aside from difficulties to reconcile their roles as wives, mothers and academics, they are confronted with instances of marginalisation in forest research discourse and fieldwork. The picture emerging from the empirical data is that the complexity of struggles female African scholars experience and the great efforts they need to make to participate in forest governance research remain somewhat ‘invisible’ in academic contexts. We argue that future research needs to explore more how socio-cultural conditions create specific barriers for women in scientific fields.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 103339"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science as a field of struggle: Gendered experiences of African scholars doing forest governance research\",\"authors\":\"Olena Strelnyk ,&nbsp;Susanne Koch ,&nbsp;Camilla Tetley ,&nbsp;Shizuku Sunagawa ,&nbsp;Amani J. Uisso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Building on scholarship addressing gender inequality in forestry, this paper investigates how African scholars experience gendered struggles in doing forest governance research. Employing Bourdieu's theoretical lens of science as a (gendered) social field of struggle, we consider scholars' participation in academia as shaped by dispositions related to gender, locality and other social dimensions of difference. Based on interviews with twenty female and male scholars affiliated with research organisations in African countries, we examine how these dispositions affect their experiences as academics in forest governance research. Therefore, we adopt an integrative interpretative approach to interview analysis focusing on narratives, positionings and discursive dynamics.</div><div>We present our empirical results according to two core themes: gendered experiences of struggle in reconciling family commitments with the requirements of scientific productivity and mobility; and gendered experiences of struggle related to doing science in male-dominated research environments. The study reveals that African women scholars in the field encounter specific difficulties in meeting the requirements of scientific productivity and mobility due to patriarchal gender orders. Aside from difficulties to reconcile their roles as wives, mothers and academics, they are confronted with instances of marginalisation in forest research discourse and fieldwork. The picture emerging from the empirical data is that the complexity of struggles female African scholars experience and the great efforts they need to make to participate in forest governance research remain somewhat ‘invisible’ in academic contexts. We argue that future research needs to explore more how socio-cultural conditions create specific barriers for women in scientific fields.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412400193X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412400193X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在研究林业中性别不平等问题的基础上,探讨了非洲学者在开展森林治理研究时如何经历性别斗争。我们从布迪厄的理论视角出发,将科学视为(性别化的)社会斗争领域,将学者参与学术研究视为由与性别、地域和其他社会差异相关的处置方式所决定。根据对非洲国家研究机构的二十位男女学者的访谈,我们研究了这些处置方式如何影响他们作为学者参与森林治理研究的经历。因此,我们在访谈分析中采用了一种综合性解释方法,重点关注叙事、立场和话语动态。我们根据两个核心主题介绍了我们的实证结果:在协调家庭承诺与科学生产力和流动性要求方面的性别斗争经验;以及在男性主导的研究环境中从事科学研究的性别斗争经验。研究显示,由于父权制的性别秩序,非洲女学者在满足科学生产力和流动性要求方面遇到了具体困难。除了难以兼顾妻子、母亲和学者的角色外,她们还面临着在森林研究话语和实地工作中被边缘化的情况。从经验数据中得出的结论是,非洲女性学者所经历的复杂斗争以及她们为参与森林治理研究而需要付出的巨大努力在学术环境中仍然是 "隐形的"。我们认为,未来的研究需要更多地探讨社会文化条件是如何在科学领域为女性制造特定障碍的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Science as a field of struggle: Gendered experiences of African scholars doing forest governance research
Building on scholarship addressing gender inequality in forestry, this paper investigates how African scholars experience gendered struggles in doing forest governance research. Employing Bourdieu's theoretical lens of science as a (gendered) social field of struggle, we consider scholars' participation in academia as shaped by dispositions related to gender, locality and other social dimensions of difference. Based on interviews with twenty female and male scholars affiliated with research organisations in African countries, we examine how these dispositions affect their experiences as academics in forest governance research. Therefore, we adopt an integrative interpretative approach to interview analysis focusing on narratives, positionings and discursive dynamics.
We present our empirical results according to two core themes: gendered experiences of struggle in reconciling family commitments with the requirements of scientific productivity and mobility; and gendered experiences of struggle related to doing science in male-dominated research environments. The study reveals that African women scholars in the field encounter specific difficulties in meeting the requirements of scientific productivity and mobility due to patriarchal gender orders. Aside from difficulties to reconcile their roles as wives, mothers and academics, they are confronted with instances of marginalisation in forest research discourse and fieldwork. The picture emerging from the empirical data is that the complexity of struggles female African scholars experience and the great efforts they need to make to participate in forest governance research remain somewhat ‘invisible’ in academic contexts. We argue that future research needs to explore more how socio-cultural conditions create specific barriers for women in scientific fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
The oil palm replanting imperative: Are smallholder farmers willing to participate? Reviewing factors that influence voluntary participation in conservation programs in Latin America Preliminary evidence of softwood shortage and hardwood availability in EU regions: A spatial analysis using the European Forest Industry Database How contracted tree farmers engage in and benefit from inclusive value chains: Evidence from Vietnam Outsourcing stumpage price uncertainty with American put option for active timber management1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1