COVID-19后中国城市低碳复苏的健康共同效益

Chenxi Lu, Yingjian Huang, Ying Yu, Jiawei Hu, Huibin Mo, Yun Li, Da Huo, Xuanren Song, Xiaoting Huang, Yun Sun, Kai Liu, Shaohui Zhang, Karyn Morrissey, Jinpyo Hong, Zhu Deng, Zhuanjia Du, Felix Creutzig, Zhu Liu
{"title":"COVID-19后中国城市低碳复苏的健康共同效益","authors":"Chenxi Lu, Yingjian Huang, Ying Yu, Jiawei Hu, Huibin Mo, Yun Li, Da Huo, Xuanren Song, Xiaoting Huang, Yun Sun, Kai Liu, Shaohui Zhang, Karyn Morrissey, Jinpyo Hong, Zhu Deng, Zhuanjia Du, Felix Creutzig, Zhu Liu","doi":"10.1038/s44284-024-00115-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-pandemic green recovery is pivotal in achieving global sustainable development goals by simultaneously revitalizing economies and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution and improving public welfare. However, subnational and city-level understanding of green recovery, its efficacy and its alignment with public health is poorly understood. Here we focus on post-COVID-19 low-carbon recovery—economic growth combined with reduced carbon emissions—and explore health co-benefits in Chinese cities. A novel near-real-time daily carbon emission dataset of 48 cities in China is developed, coupled with detailed health and economic municipal statistics and models. We find that, on average, six low-carbon-recovery cities, mainly megacities, saved 1.2 times as many lives per 100,000 population compared with the 42 other cities, and their annual monetary avoided premature deaths per 100,000 population was 1.5 times more than the 42 other cities. The accumulated monetary health co-benefits for low-carbon-recovery cities were US$ 4.2 billion (95% confidence interval, 2.1–6.3) during the post-COVID-19 period. We show that government spending on electric vehicles increases the likelihood of achieving low-carbon recovery in Chinese cities. Our results underscore the significant health co-benefits of low-carbon recovery, pointing to synergies between advancing local welfare and global environmental objectives. Using near-real-time daily carbon emission datasets from 48 cities in China, this paper explores post-COVID-19 during which Chinese cities experienced economic growth and reduced greenhouse gas emissions—a low-carbon recovery. Six low-carbon-recovery cities (mainly megacities) saved, on average, 1.2 times as many lives per 100,000 population than the 42 other cities.","PeriodicalId":501700,"journal":{"name":"Nature Cities","volume":"1 10","pages":"695-705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health co-benefits of post-COVID-19 low-carbon recovery in Chinese cities\",\"authors\":\"Chenxi Lu, Yingjian Huang, Ying Yu, Jiawei Hu, Huibin Mo, Yun Li, Da Huo, Xuanren Song, Xiaoting Huang, Yun Sun, Kai Liu, Shaohui Zhang, Karyn Morrissey, Jinpyo Hong, Zhu Deng, Zhuanjia Du, Felix Creutzig, Zhu Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44284-024-00115-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Post-pandemic green recovery is pivotal in achieving global sustainable development goals by simultaneously revitalizing economies and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution and improving public welfare. However, subnational and city-level understanding of green recovery, its efficacy and its alignment with public health is poorly understood. Here we focus on post-COVID-19 low-carbon recovery—economic growth combined with reduced carbon emissions—and explore health co-benefits in Chinese cities. A novel near-real-time daily carbon emission dataset of 48 cities in China is developed, coupled with detailed health and economic municipal statistics and models. We find that, on average, six low-carbon-recovery cities, mainly megacities, saved 1.2 times as many lives per 100,000 population compared with the 42 other cities, and their annual monetary avoided premature deaths per 100,000 population was 1.5 times more than the 42 other cities. The accumulated monetary health co-benefits for low-carbon-recovery cities were US$ 4.2 billion (95% confidence interval, 2.1–6.3) during the post-COVID-19 period. We show that government spending on electric vehicles increases the likelihood of achieving low-carbon recovery in Chinese cities. Our results underscore the significant health co-benefits of low-carbon recovery, pointing to synergies between advancing local welfare and global environmental objectives. Using near-real-time daily carbon emission datasets from 48 cities in China, this paper explores post-COVID-19 during which Chinese cities experienced economic growth and reduced greenhouse gas emissions—a low-carbon recovery. Six low-carbon-recovery cities (mainly megacities) saved, on average, 1.2 times as many lives per 100,000 population than the 42 other cities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Cities\",\"volume\":\"1 10\",\"pages\":\"695-705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00115-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00115-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大流行病后的绿色恢复对实现全球可持续发展目标至关重要,它既能振兴经济,又能减少温室气体排放、空气污染和改善公共福利。然而,国家以下一级和城市一级对绿色恢复、其功效及其与公共卫生的协调性的理解还很欠缺。在此,我们重点关注《19 世纪经济与社会发展报告》发布后的低碳复苏--经济增长与减少碳排放相结合--并探讨中国城市的健康共同效益。我们开发了中国 48 个城市的近实时日碳排放数据集,并结合详细的健康和经济城市统计数据和模型。我们发现,与其他 42 个城市相比,6 个低碳城市(主要是特大城市)平均每 10 万人口挽救的生命是其他 42 个城市的 1.2 倍,每年每 10 万人口避免过早死亡的货币价值是其他 42 个城市的 1.5 倍。在后 COVID-19 期间,低碳恢复城市的累计货币健康共同效益为 42 亿美元(95% 置信区间,2.1-6.3)。我们的研究表明,政府在电动汽车上的支出增加了中国城市实现低碳复苏的可能性。我们的研究结果强调了低碳经济复苏对健康的显著共同效益,指出了促进地方福利和全球环境目标之间的协同作用。本文利用来自中国 48 个城市的近实时日碳排放数据集,探讨了后 COVID-19 期间中国城市经历的经济增长和温室气体减排--低碳复苏。六个低碳复苏城市(主要是特大城市)每十万人口平均挽救的生命是其他 42 个城市的 1.2 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health co-benefits of post-COVID-19 low-carbon recovery in Chinese cities
Post-pandemic green recovery is pivotal in achieving global sustainable development goals by simultaneously revitalizing economies and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution and improving public welfare. However, subnational and city-level understanding of green recovery, its efficacy and its alignment with public health is poorly understood. Here we focus on post-COVID-19 low-carbon recovery—economic growth combined with reduced carbon emissions—and explore health co-benefits in Chinese cities. A novel near-real-time daily carbon emission dataset of 48 cities in China is developed, coupled with detailed health and economic municipal statistics and models. We find that, on average, six low-carbon-recovery cities, mainly megacities, saved 1.2 times as many lives per 100,000 population compared with the 42 other cities, and their annual monetary avoided premature deaths per 100,000 population was 1.5 times more than the 42 other cities. The accumulated monetary health co-benefits for low-carbon-recovery cities were US$ 4.2 billion (95% confidence interval, 2.1–6.3) during the post-COVID-19 period. We show that government spending on electric vehicles increases the likelihood of achieving low-carbon recovery in Chinese cities. Our results underscore the significant health co-benefits of low-carbon recovery, pointing to synergies between advancing local welfare and global environmental objectives. Using near-real-time daily carbon emission datasets from 48 cities in China, this paper explores post-COVID-19 during which Chinese cities experienced economic growth and reduced greenhouse gas emissions—a low-carbon recovery. Six low-carbon-recovery cities (mainly megacities) saved, on average, 1.2 times as many lives per 100,000 population than the 42 other cities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From local to global and in between, urban context counts Long-term exposure to ambient benzene and brain disorders among urban adults Regulation of humid heat by urban green space across a climate wetness gradient Criminal governance and social order in Nottingham, England Unequal access to social, environmental and health amenities in US urban parks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1