特珠单抗在大量未受控制的重症哮喘患者中的临床反应和治疗中的临床缓解:NAVIGATOR 和 DESTINATION 研究两年来的结果。

IF 16.6 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1183/13993003.00316-2024
Michael E Wechsler,Guy Brusselle,J Christian Virchow,Arnaud Bourdin,Konstantinos Kostikas,Jean-Pierre Llanos,Stephanie L Roseti,Christopher S Ambrose,Gillian Hunter,David J Jackson,Mario Castro,Njira Lugogo,Ian D Pavord,Neil Martin,Christopher E Brightling
{"title":"特珠单抗在大量未受控制的重症哮喘患者中的临床反应和治疗中的临床缓解:NAVIGATOR 和 DESTINATION 研究两年来的结果。","authors":"Michael E Wechsler,Guy Brusselle,J Christian Virchow,Arnaud Bourdin,Konstantinos Kostikas,Jean-Pierre Llanos,Stephanie L Roseti,Christopher S Ambrose,Gillian Hunter,David J Jackson,Mario Castro,Njira Lugogo,Ian D Pavord,Neil Martin,Christopher E Brightling","doi":"10.1183/13993003.00316-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIn asthma, clinical response is characterized by disease improvement with treatment, whereas clinical remission is characterized by long-term disease stabilization with or without ongoing treatment. The proportion of patients receiving tezepelumab who responded to treatment and those who achieved on-treatment clinical remission was assessed in the NAVIGATOR (NCT03347279) and DESTINATION (NCT03706079) studies of severe, uncontrolled asthma.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nNAVIGATOR and DESTINATION were phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies; DESTINATION was an extension of NAVIGATOR. Complete clinical response was defined as achieving all of the following: ≥50% reduction in exacerbations versus the previous year, improvements in pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of ≥100 mL or ≥5%, improvements in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-6 score of ≥0.5 and physicians' assessment of asthma improvement. On-treatment clinical remission was defined as an ACQ-6 total score ≤1.5, stable lung function (pre-BD FEV1 >95% of baseline) and no exacerbations or use of oral corticosteroids during the time periods assessed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nHigher proportions of tezepelumab than placebo recipients achieved complete clinical response over weeks 0-52 (46% versus 24%; OR: 2.83 [95% CI: 2.10-3.82]), and on-treatment clinical remission over weeks 0-52 (28.5% versus 21.9%; OR: 1.44 [95% CI: 0.95-2.19]) and weeks >52-104 (33.5% versus 26.7%; OR: 1.44 [95% CI: 0.97-2.14]). Tezepelumab recipients who achieved on-treatment clinical remission versus complete clinical response at week 52 had better preserved lung function and lower inflammatory biomarkers at baseline, and fewer exacerbations in the 12 months before the study.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAmong patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma, tezepelumab treatment was associated with an increased likelihood of achieving complete clinical response and on-treatment clinical remission compared with placebo. Both are clinically important outcomes but may be driven by different patient characteristics.","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical response and on-treatment clinical remission with tezepelumab in a broad population of patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma: results over 2 years from the NAVIGATOR and DESTINATION studies.\",\"authors\":\"Michael E Wechsler,Guy Brusselle,J Christian Virchow,Arnaud Bourdin,Konstantinos Kostikas,Jean-Pierre Llanos,Stephanie L Roseti,Christopher S Ambrose,Gillian Hunter,David J Jackson,Mario Castro,Njira Lugogo,Ian D Pavord,Neil Martin,Christopher E Brightling\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.00316-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nIn asthma, clinical response is characterized by disease improvement with treatment, whereas clinical remission is characterized by long-term disease stabilization with or without ongoing treatment. The proportion of patients receiving tezepelumab who responded to treatment and those who achieved on-treatment clinical remission was assessed in the NAVIGATOR (NCT03347279) and DESTINATION (NCT03706079) studies of severe, uncontrolled asthma.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nNAVIGATOR and DESTINATION were phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies; DESTINATION was an extension of NAVIGATOR. Complete clinical response was defined as achieving all of the following: ≥50% reduction in exacerbations versus the previous year, improvements in pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of ≥100 mL or ≥5%, improvements in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-6 score of ≥0.5 and physicians' assessment of asthma improvement. On-treatment clinical remission was defined as an ACQ-6 total score ≤1.5, stable lung function (pre-BD FEV1 >95% of baseline) and no exacerbations or use of oral corticosteroids during the time periods assessed.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nHigher proportions of tezepelumab than placebo recipients achieved complete clinical response over weeks 0-52 (46% versus 24%; OR: 2.83 [95% CI: 2.10-3.82]), and on-treatment clinical remission over weeks 0-52 (28.5% versus 21.9%; OR: 1.44 [95% CI: 0.95-2.19]) and weeks >52-104 (33.5% versus 26.7%; OR: 1.44 [95% CI: 0.97-2.14]). Tezepelumab recipients who achieved on-treatment clinical remission versus complete clinical response at week 52 had better preserved lung function and lower inflammatory biomarkers at baseline, and fewer exacerbations in the 12 months before the study.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nAmong patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma, tezepelumab treatment was associated with an increased likelihood of achieving complete clinical response and on-treatment clinical remission compared with placebo. Both are clinically important outcomes but may be driven by different patient characteristics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00316-2024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00316-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在哮喘中,临床反应的特点是治疗后疾病得到改善,而临床缓解的特点是无论是否继续治疗,疾病都能长期稳定。NAVIGATOR(NCT03347279)和DESTINATION(NCT03706079)研究评估了接受替塞泊单抗治疗的患者中对治疗产生反应的患者比例以及在治疗中达到临床缓解的患者比例。完全临床应答的定义是达到以下所有条件:与前一年相比,病情加重次数减少≥50%;支气管扩张剂(BD)前 1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)改善≥100 毫升或≥5%;哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)-6 评分改善≥0.5;医生评估哮喘改善情况。治疗中临床缓解的定义是:ACQ-6 总分≤1.5,肺功能稳定(治疗前 FEV1 >基线的 95%),且在评估期间无加重或使用口服皮质类固醇。结果0-52周内获得完全临床应答(46%对24%;OR:2.83 [95% CI:2.10-3.82])以及0-52周内获得治疗中临床缓解(28.5%对21.9%;OR:1.44 [95% CI:0.95-2.19])和>52-104周内获得治疗中临床缓解(33.5%对26.7%;OR:1.44 [95% CI:0.97-2.14])的替塞普鲁单抗受试者比例高于安慰剂受试者。结论与安慰剂相比,在严重、未得到控制的哮喘患者中,替塞单抗治疗与获得完全临床应答和治疗中临床缓解的可能性增加有关。这两项结果在临床上都很重要,但可能受不同患者特征的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical response and on-treatment clinical remission with tezepelumab in a broad population of patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma: results over 2 years from the NAVIGATOR and DESTINATION studies.
BACKGROUND In asthma, clinical response is characterized by disease improvement with treatment, whereas clinical remission is characterized by long-term disease stabilization with or without ongoing treatment. The proportion of patients receiving tezepelumab who responded to treatment and those who achieved on-treatment clinical remission was assessed in the NAVIGATOR (NCT03347279) and DESTINATION (NCT03706079) studies of severe, uncontrolled asthma. METHODS NAVIGATOR and DESTINATION were phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies; DESTINATION was an extension of NAVIGATOR. Complete clinical response was defined as achieving all of the following: ≥50% reduction in exacerbations versus the previous year, improvements in pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of ≥100 mL or ≥5%, improvements in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-6 score of ≥0.5 and physicians' assessment of asthma improvement. On-treatment clinical remission was defined as an ACQ-6 total score ≤1.5, stable lung function (pre-BD FEV1 >95% of baseline) and no exacerbations or use of oral corticosteroids during the time periods assessed. RESULTS Higher proportions of tezepelumab than placebo recipients achieved complete clinical response over weeks 0-52 (46% versus 24%; OR: 2.83 [95% CI: 2.10-3.82]), and on-treatment clinical remission over weeks 0-52 (28.5% versus 21.9%; OR: 1.44 [95% CI: 0.95-2.19]) and weeks >52-104 (33.5% versus 26.7%; OR: 1.44 [95% CI: 0.97-2.14]). Tezepelumab recipients who achieved on-treatment clinical remission versus complete clinical response at week 52 had better preserved lung function and lower inflammatory biomarkers at baseline, and fewer exacerbations in the 12 months before the study. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma, tezepelumab treatment was associated with an increased likelihood of achieving complete clinical response and on-treatment clinical remission compared with placebo. Both are clinically important outcomes but may be driven by different patient characteristics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.
期刊最新文献
European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Impact of the expanded label for elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis with no F508del variant in the USA. Determination of loss of chromosome Y in peripheral blood cells in males with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. ERJ advances: epigenetic ageing and leveraging DNA methylation in chronic respiratory diseases. Perspective on WHO implementation guidance on TB infection prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1