儿科护士创伤护理态度量表(PACAS)的开发和心理测试。

Adnan Batuhan Coşkun, Erhan Elmaoğlu, Murat Bektaş
{"title":"儿科护士创伤护理态度量表(PACAS)的开发和心理测试。","authors":"Adnan Batuhan Coşkun, Erhan Elmaoğlu, Murat Bektaş","doi":"10.1016/j.pedn.2024.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to develop and validate the Pediatric Atraumatic Care Attitude Scale (PACAS) for pediatric nurses, measuring attitudes toward atraumatic care practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This methodological and correlational study included 336 pediatric nurses from various clinics in Turkey, between January and August 2024. Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency was assessed through item-total score correlation, test-retest reliability, and Cronbach's α coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The content validity index (CVI) for PACAS items ranged from 0.84 to 1.00. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) coefficient was 0.978, and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (χ<sup>2</sup> = 14,110.425, P < .001), supporting factor analysis. EFA revealed a two-factor structure with 31 items, explaining 76.7 % of the variance. The factors, \"Knowledge and Awareness\" and \"Practice and Family Involvement,\" had loadings between 0.716 and 0.901 and 0.751-0.962, respectively. CFA confirmed the model fit (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.77, RMSEA = 0.073, NFI = 0.92, NNFI = 0.97, CFI = 0.94, GFI = 0.91). Cronbach's α was 0.985, with subscale coefficients of 0.978 and 0.983. Test-retest reliability showed strong correlations (r = 0.980, r = 0.985, r = 0.957), with no significant differences between test and retest scores (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PACAS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing pediatric nurses' attitudes toward atraumatic care, with the potential to enhance pediatric nursing practices by improving adherence to atraumatic care principles.</p><p><strong>Implications to practice: </strong>PACAS helps integrate atraumatic care into nursing, enhancing pediatric care quality and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and psychometric testing of the Pediatric Atraumatic Care Attitude Scale (PACAS) in pediatric nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Adnan Batuhan Coşkun, Erhan Elmaoğlu, Murat Bektaş\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pedn.2024.09.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to develop and validate the Pediatric Atraumatic Care Attitude Scale (PACAS) for pediatric nurses, measuring attitudes toward atraumatic care practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This methodological and correlational study included 336 pediatric nurses from various clinics in Turkey, between January and August 2024. Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency was assessed through item-total score correlation, test-retest reliability, and Cronbach's α coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The content validity index (CVI) for PACAS items ranged from 0.84 to 1.00. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) coefficient was 0.978, and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (χ<sup>2</sup> = 14,110.425, P < .001), supporting factor analysis. EFA revealed a two-factor structure with 31 items, explaining 76.7 % of the variance. The factors, \\\"Knowledge and Awareness\\\" and \\\"Practice and Family Involvement,\\\" had loadings between 0.716 and 0.901 and 0.751-0.962, respectively. CFA confirmed the model fit (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.77, RMSEA = 0.073, NFI = 0.92, NNFI = 0.97, CFI = 0.94, GFI = 0.91). Cronbach's α was 0.985, with subscale coefficients of 0.978 and 0.983. Test-retest reliability showed strong correlations (r = 0.980, r = 0.985, r = 0.957), with no significant differences between test and retest scores (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PACAS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing pediatric nurses' attitudes toward atraumatic care, with the potential to enhance pediatric nursing practices by improving adherence to atraumatic care principles.</p><p><strong>Implications to practice: </strong>PACAS helps integrate atraumatic care into nursing, enhancing pediatric care quality and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2024.09.015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2024.09.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的该研究旨在为儿科护士开发并验证儿科创伤护理态度量表(PACAS),以衡量其对创伤护理实践的态度:这项方法学和相关性研究包括来自土耳其不同诊所的 336 名儿科护士,时间跨度为 2024 年 1 月至 8 月。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和确认性因子分析(CFA)评估了结构效度。通过项目-总分相关性、测试-再测信度和 Cronbach's α 系数评估了内部一致性:结果:PACAS项目的内容效度指数(CVI)介于0.84和1.00之间。凯泽-迈耶-奥尔金(KMO)系数为 0.978,巴特利特球形度检验显著(χ2 = 14,110.425,P 2/df = 2.77,RMSEA = 0.073,NFI = 0.92,NNFI = 0.97,CFI = 0.94,GFI = 0.91)。Cronbach's α 为 0.985,子量表系数分别为 0.978 和 0.983。测试-重测信度显示出很强的相关性(r = 0.980、r = 0.985、r = 0.957),测试和重测得分之间无显著差异(P > .05):结论:PACAS是评估儿科护士对创伤护理态度的可靠有效的工具,有可能通过改善对创伤护理原则的遵守来加强儿科护理实践:PACAS 有助于将创伤护理融入护理工作,提高儿科护理质量和效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and psychometric testing of the Pediatric Atraumatic Care Attitude Scale (PACAS) in pediatric nurses.

Objective: The study aimed to develop and validate the Pediatric Atraumatic Care Attitude Scale (PACAS) for pediatric nurses, measuring attitudes toward atraumatic care practices.

Methods: This methodological and correlational study included 336 pediatric nurses from various clinics in Turkey, between January and August 2024. Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency was assessed through item-total score correlation, test-retest reliability, and Cronbach's α coefficients.

Results: The content validity index (CVI) for PACAS items ranged from 0.84 to 1.00. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) coefficient was 0.978, and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (χ2 = 14,110.425, P < .001), supporting factor analysis. EFA revealed a two-factor structure with 31 items, explaining 76.7 % of the variance. The factors, "Knowledge and Awareness" and "Practice and Family Involvement," had loadings between 0.716 and 0.901 and 0.751-0.962, respectively. CFA confirmed the model fit (χ2/df = 2.77, RMSEA = 0.073, NFI = 0.92, NNFI = 0.97, CFI = 0.94, GFI = 0.91). Cronbach's α was 0.985, with subscale coefficients of 0.978 and 0.983. Test-retest reliability showed strong correlations (r = 0.980, r = 0.985, r = 0.957), with no significant differences between test and retest scores (P > .05).

Conclusions: PACAS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing pediatric nurses' attitudes toward atraumatic care, with the potential to enhance pediatric nursing practices by improving adherence to atraumatic care principles.

Implications to practice: PACAS helps integrate atraumatic care into nursing, enhancing pediatric care quality and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
291
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society (PENS) The Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families (JPN) is interested in publishing evidence-based practice, quality improvement, theory, and research papers on a variety of topics from US and international authors. JPN is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society. Cecily L. Betz, PhD, RN, FAAN is the Founder and Editor in Chief. Journal content covers the life span from birth to adolescence. Submissions should be pertinent to the nursing care needs of healthy and ill infants, children, and adolescents, addressing their biopsychosocial needs. JPN also features the following regular columns for which authors may submit brief papers: Hot Topics and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Identifying missed care in pediatric nursing: A scoping review The development of sudden infant death syndrome awareness scale-mother form and examination of its psychometric properties Effects of hospital treatment for congenital heart defects on mother-infant bonding, maternal stress, and parenting Psychosocial factors correlating self-care management among Jordanian adolescents with type 1 diabetes The social inclusion of care leavers during their transitioning to independent life from aftercare services – A mixed method, retrospective document analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1