儿童烹饪计划的成果:干预研究的系统回顾。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2024.08.002
Klazine van der Horst, Samantha Smith, Amy Blom, Loan Catalano, Ana Isabel de Allmeida Costa, Joyce Haddad, Leslie Cunningham-Sabo
{"title":"儿童烹饪计划的成果:干预研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Klazine van der Horst, Samantha Smith, Amy Blom, Loan Catalano, Ana Isabel de Allmeida Costa, Joyce Haddad, Leslie Cunningham-Sabo","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the factors that make such programs successful, this systematic review compared the outcomes of children's participation in cooking interventions based on intervention characteristics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of children's participation in cooking interventions published between 1998 and 2022 guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All settings PARTICIPANTS: Children and parents.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Cooking skills, food acceptance and dietary behavior.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Systematic search of 1,104 articles and review of 23 studies (42 articles) meeting inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interventions varied in participant age, settings, cooking sessions, and program length. Knowledge of cooking skills, self-efficacy, and child cooking involvement were the most frequent positive outcomes; improvements in dietary intake were rarely achieved. Seven studies had a high rating for research quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications for research and practice: </strong>Lack of standardized assessment, large variability in program characteristics, and insufficient intervention description made it difficult to discern best practices for children's cooking programs. Improvements in intervention development and measurement instruments are needed. Interventions that include hands-on cooking lessons seem promising in improving knowledge and self-efficacy; however, further exploration is required on the factors that make cooking programs successful in the long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Children's Cooking Programs: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Klazine van der Horst, Samantha Smith, Amy Blom, Loan Catalano, Ana Isabel de Allmeida Costa, Joyce Haddad, Leslie Cunningham-Sabo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the factors that make such programs successful, this systematic review compared the outcomes of children's participation in cooking interventions based on intervention characteristics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of children's participation in cooking interventions published between 1998 and 2022 guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All settings PARTICIPANTS: Children and parents.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Cooking skills, food acceptance and dietary behavior.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Systematic search of 1,104 articles and review of 23 studies (42 articles) meeting inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interventions varied in participant age, settings, cooking sessions, and program length. Knowledge of cooking skills, self-efficacy, and child cooking involvement were the most frequent positive outcomes; improvements in dietary intake were rarely achieved. Seven studies had a high rating for research quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications for research and practice: </strong>Lack of standardized assessment, large variability in program characteristics, and insufficient intervention description made it difficult to discern best practices for children's cooking programs. Improvements in intervention development and measurement instruments are needed. Interventions that include hands-on cooking lessons seem promising in improving knowledge and self-efficacy; however, further exploration is required on the factors that make cooking programs successful in the long term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2024.08.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2024.08.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的为了研究此类计划的成功因素,本系统性综述根据干预措施的特点对儿童参与烹饪干预措施的结果进行了比较:设计:对 1998 年至 2022 年间发表的有关儿童参与烹饪干预的随机对照试验进行系统性综述,以《系统性综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》声明为指导:所有环境 参与者:儿童和家长:主要结果测量主要结果测量:烹饪技能、食物接受度和饮食行为:分析:对 1,104 篇文章进行了系统搜索,并对符合纳入标准的 23 项研究(42 篇文章)进行了审查:结果:干预措施在参与者年龄、环境、烹饪课程和计划长度方面各不相同。烹饪技能知识、自我效能感和儿童烹饪参与度是最常见的积极成果;而饮食摄入量很少得到改善。七项研究的研究质量评分较高:由于缺乏标准化评估、项目特点差异较大以及干预措施描述不足,因此很难确定儿童烹饪项目的最佳实践。需要改进干预措施的开发和测量工具。包括动手烹饪课程在内的干预措施在提高知识水平和自我效能方面似乎很有前景;但是,还需要进一步探讨使烹饪项目取得长期成功的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of Children's Cooking Programs: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies.

Objective: To examine the factors that make such programs successful, this systematic review compared the outcomes of children's participation in cooking interventions based on intervention characteristics.

Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of children's participation in cooking interventions published between 1998 and 2022 guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

Setting: All settings PARTICIPANTS: Children and parents.

Main outcome measures: Cooking skills, food acceptance and dietary behavior.

Analysis: Systematic search of 1,104 articles and review of 23 studies (42 articles) meeting inclusion criteria.

Results: Interventions varied in participant age, settings, cooking sessions, and program length. Knowledge of cooking skills, self-efficacy, and child cooking involvement were the most frequent positive outcomes; improvements in dietary intake were rarely achieved. Seven studies had a high rating for research quality.

Conclusion and implications for research and practice: Lack of standardized assessment, large variability in program characteristics, and insufficient intervention description made it difficult to discern best practices for children's cooking programs. Improvements in intervention development and measurement instruments are needed. Interventions that include hands-on cooking lessons seem promising in improving knowledge and self-efficacy; however, further exploration is required on the factors that make cooking programs successful in the long term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
期刊最新文献
"All You Need to Manage Blood Pressure": A Comprehensive e-Education Program for Hypertension. Highlighting the Importance of Policy, Systems and Environmental Change Interventions in Nutrition Education and Behavior? Impact of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend and Nutrition Education on Child Growth, Caregivers' Nutrition Knowledge, and WASH Practices. Nutrition Education in Primary Care: Comparing Video vs Handout Interventions. The 2022 Minnesota Statewide Food Shelf Survey: Reported Availability of Healthy Foods and Importance of Culturally-specific Foods by Participant Demographic Characteristics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1