具体性和具体概念的神经表征是个人特有的。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0288-24.2024
Thomas L Botch, Emily S Finn
{"title":"具体性和具体概念的神经表征是个人特有的。","authors":"Thomas L Botch, Emily S Finn","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0288-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different people listening to the same story may converge upon a largely shared interpretation while still developing idiosyncratic experiences atop that shared foundation. What linguistic properties support this individualized experience of natural language? Here, we investigate how the \"concrete-abstract\" axis-the extent to which a word is grounded in sensory experience-relates to within- and across-subject variability in the neural representations of language. Leveraging a dataset of human participants of both sexes who each listened to four auditory stories while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging, we demonstrate that neural representations of \"concreteness\" are both reliable across stories and relatively unique to individuals, while neural representations of \"abstractness\" are variable both within individuals and across the population. Using natural language processing tools, we show that concrete words exhibit similar neural representations despite spanning larger distances within a high-dimensional semantic space, which potentially reflects an underlying representational signature of sensory experience-namely, imageability-shared by concrete words but absent from abstract words. Our findings situate the concrete-abstract axis as a core dimension that supports both shared and individualized representations of natural language.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural Representations of Concreteness and Concrete Concepts Are Specific to the Individual.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas L Botch, Emily S Finn\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0288-24.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Different people listening to the same story may converge upon a largely shared interpretation while still developing idiosyncratic experiences atop that shared foundation. What linguistic properties support this individualized experience of natural language? Here, we investigate how the \\\"concrete-abstract\\\" axis-the extent to which a word is grounded in sensory experience-relates to within- and across-subject variability in the neural representations of language. Leveraging a dataset of human participants of both sexes who each listened to four auditory stories while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging, we demonstrate that neural representations of \\\"concreteness\\\" are both reliable across stories and relatively unique to individuals, while neural representations of \\\"abstractness\\\" are variable both within individuals and across the population. Using natural language processing tools, we show that concrete words exhibit similar neural representations despite spanning larger distances within a high-dimensional semantic space, which potentially reflects an underlying representational signature of sensory experience-namely, imageability-shared by concrete words but absent from abstract words. Our findings situate the concrete-abstract axis as a core dimension that supports both shared and individualized representations of natural language.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551891/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0288-24.2024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0288-24.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同的人在聆听同一个故事时,可能会趋同于大致相同的解释,但同时仍会在这个共同的基础上发展出特异的体验。是什么语言特性支持了这种个性化的自然语言体验?在这里,我们研究了 "具体-抽象 "轴(即一个词在多大程度上以感官体验为基础)与语言神经表征的主体内和主体间变异的关系。我们利用一个由男女人类参与者组成的数据集,让他们在接受功能性核磁共振成像检查的同时聆听四个听觉故事,结果表明 "具体性 "的神经表征在不同的故事中都是可靠的,而且对个体来说也是相对独特的,而 "抽象性 "的神经表征在个体内部和人群中都是可变的。通过使用自然语言处理工具,我们发现尽管具体词语在高维语义空间中的距离更大,但它们却表现出相似的神经表征,这可能反映了感官体验的潜在表征特征--即形象性--具体词语具有这种特征,而抽象词语却不具备这种特征。我们的研究结果表明,具体-抽象轴是支持自然语言的共享表征和个性化表征的核心维度。因此,尽管面对相同的信息,人们可能会形成不同的解释。大脑利用了语言的哪些特性来形成这种不同的个性化体验?对功能性核磁共振成像(MRI)数据的分析表明,"具体性",即语言与感官体验的相关程度,唤起了可靠的神经模式,这些模式对每个受试者来说都是独一无二的,使我们能够仅根据神经数据来识别个体。机器学习方法的应用表明,具体概念集(而非抽象概念集)显示出稳定的神经模式,这可能是由于一种感官特征:形象性。总之,这项研究将具体性描述为支持真实世界语言个性化体验的核心属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neural Representations of Concreteness and Concrete Concepts Are Specific to the Individual.

Different people listening to the same story may converge upon a largely shared interpretation while still developing idiosyncratic experiences atop that shared foundation. What linguistic properties support this individualized experience of natural language? Here, we investigate how the "concrete-abstract" axis-the extent to which a word is grounded in sensory experience-relates to within- and across-subject variability in the neural representations of language. Leveraging a dataset of human participants of both sexes who each listened to four auditory stories while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging, we demonstrate that neural representations of "concreteness" are both reliable across stories and relatively unique to individuals, while neural representations of "abstractness" are variable both within individuals and across the population. Using natural language processing tools, we show that concrete words exhibit similar neural representations despite spanning larger distances within a high-dimensional semantic space, which potentially reflects an underlying representational signature of sensory experience-namely, imageability-shared by concrete words but absent from abstract words. Our findings situate the concrete-abstract axis as a core dimension that supports both shared and individualized representations of natural language.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
期刊最新文献
A Prefrontal→Periaqueductal Gray Pathway Differentially Engages Autonomic, Hormonal, and Behavioral Features of the Stress-Coping Response. Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Face-Specific Attention during Goal-Directed Visual Search. Monosynaptic Inputs to Ventral Tegmental Area Glutamate and GABA Co-transmitting Neurons. Dynamics of Saccade Trajectory Modulation by Distractors: Neural Activity Patterns in the Frontal Eye Field. Monocyte Invasion into the Retina Restricts the Regeneration of Neurons from Müller Glia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1