Chijioke Bennett , Zaheer Hoosain , Anthonet Koen , Umesh Lalloo , Cheryl Louw , Vongane Maluleke , Faeezah Patel , Gabriella Benade , Esme Louise Venter , Shirley Galbiati , Vivek Shinde , Shabir A. Madhi , on behalf of the Study 2019nCoV-505 Investigators Group
{"title":"南非 HIV-1 感染者和非 HIV-1 感染者接种 SARS-CoV-2 重组尖峰蛋白疫苗的免疫原性和安全性:2 期随机试验。","authors":"Chijioke Bennett , Zaheer Hoosain , Anthonet Koen , Umesh Lalloo , Cheryl Louw , Vongane Maluleke , Faeezah Patel , Gabriella Benade , Esme Louise Venter , Shirley Galbiati , Vivek Shinde , Shabir A. Madhi , on behalf of the Study 2019nCoV-505 Investigators Group","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Response data for COVID-19 vaccines in immunosuppressed individuals are typically limited to standard dosing in small populations. Adjusting number or interval of doses may impact immune responses based on HIV status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This phase 2 randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled South African study (2019nCoV-505/NCT05112848) enrolled medically stable people living with HIV (PLWH) and HIV-uninfected participants aged 18–65 years. PLWH were randomised 1:1:1 to receive NVX-CoV2373 on day 0 (D0) and either D21 (2-Dose<sub>D0/D21</sub>) or D70 (2-Dose<sub>D0/D70</sub>), or on D0, D21, and D70 (3-Dose). HIV-uninfected participants were randomised 1:1 to each 2-Dose regimen. PLWH were stratified into well-controlled and less–well-controlled subgroups. The primary immunologic endpoint included serum IgG and neutralising antibody responses (per geometric mean fold rise [GMFR] in titre and seroconversion rate) to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 at D35 (2-Dose<sub>D0/D21</sub>) and D84 (2-Dose<sub>D0/D70</sub> and 3-Dose). The primary safety endpoints were participants with an unsolicited adverse event through D84, at D120, and at D180, or reactogenicity ≤7 days post-vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 288 PLWH, 98, 96, and 94 were randomised into the 2-Dose<sub>D0/D21</sub>, 2-Dose<sub>D0/D70</sub>, and 3-Dose groups, respectively; 96 HIV-uninfected participants were randomised to the 2-Dose<sub>D0/D21</sub> (n = 47) or 2-Dose<sub>D0/D70</sub> (n = 49) regimens. Most (>85%) of the population were SARS-CoV-2 positive at baseline. Ancestral anti-spike IgG GMFRs in PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants, respectively, were 12·4 and 12·9 (D35) and 12·2 and 13·6 (D84). Comparable outcomes occurred across dosing regimens and in well-controlled and less–well-controlled PLWH. Microneutralization GMFRs at D84 in PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants, respectively, were: 6·9 and 10·1 (2-Dose<sub>D0/D21</sub>), 11·0 and 11·3 (2-Dose<sub>D0/D70</sub>), and 17·2 (PLWH 3-Dose). Antibody responses against BA.1 trended similar to those against the ancestral virus. Safety outcomes were comparable among PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrated that NVX-CoV2373 produced consistent immunogenicity responses to SARS-CoV-2 among PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants, with no new safety signals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":"89 6","pages":"Article 106285"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine in South African people living with and without HIV-1 infection: A phase 2 randomised trial\",\"authors\":\"Chijioke Bennett , Zaheer Hoosain , Anthonet Koen , Umesh Lalloo , Cheryl Louw , Vongane Maluleke , Faeezah Patel , Gabriella Benade , Esme Louise Venter , Shirley Galbiati , Vivek Shinde , Shabir A. Madhi , on behalf of the Study 2019nCoV-505 Investigators Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Response data for COVID-19 vaccines in immunosuppressed individuals are typically limited to standard dosing in small populations. Adjusting number or interval of doses may impact immune responses based on HIV status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This phase 2 randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled South African study (2019nCoV-505/NCT05112848) enrolled medically stable people living with HIV (PLWH) and HIV-uninfected participants aged 18–65 years. PLWH were randomised 1:1:1 to receive NVX-CoV2373 on day 0 (D0) and either D21 (2-Dose<sub>D0/D21</sub>) or D70 (2-Dose<sub>D0/D70</sub>), or on D0, D21, and D70 (3-Dose). HIV-uninfected participants were randomised 1:1 to each 2-Dose regimen. PLWH were stratified into well-controlled and less–well-controlled subgroups. The primary immunologic endpoint included serum IgG and neutralising antibody responses (per geometric mean fold rise [GMFR] in titre and seroconversion rate) to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 at D35 (2-Dose<sub>D0/D21</sub>) and D84 (2-Dose<sub>D0/D70</sub> and 3-Dose). The primary safety endpoints were participants with an unsolicited adverse event through D84, at D120, and at D180, or reactogenicity ≤7 days post-vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 288 PLWH, 98, 96, and 94 were randomised into the 2-Dose<sub>D0/D21</sub>, 2-Dose<sub>D0/D70</sub>, and 3-Dose groups, respectively; 96 HIV-uninfected participants were randomised to the 2-Dose<sub>D0/D21</sub> (n = 47) or 2-Dose<sub>D0/D70</sub> (n = 49) regimens. Most (>85%) of the population were SARS-CoV-2 positive at baseline. Ancestral anti-spike IgG GMFRs in PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants, respectively, were 12·4 and 12·9 (D35) and 12·2 and 13·6 (D84). Comparable outcomes occurred across dosing regimens and in well-controlled and less–well-controlled PLWH. Microneutralization GMFRs at D84 in PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants, respectively, were: 6·9 and 10·1 (2-Dose<sub>D0/D21</sub>), 11·0 and 11·3 (2-Dose<sub>D0/D70</sub>), and 17·2 (PLWH 3-Dose). Antibody responses against BA.1 trended similar to those against the ancestral virus. Safety outcomes were comparable among PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrated that NVX-CoV2373 produced consistent immunogenicity responses to SARS-CoV-2 among PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants, with no new safety signals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection\",\"volume\":\"89 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 106285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324002196\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324002196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine in South African people living with and without HIV-1 infection: A phase 2 randomised trial
Background
Response data for COVID-19 vaccines in immunosuppressed individuals are typically limited to standard dosing in small populations. Adjusting number or interval of doses may impact immune responses based on HIV status.
Methods
This phase 2 randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled South African study (2019nCoV-505/NCT05112848) enrolled medically stable people living with HIV (PLWH) and HIV-uninfected participants aged 18–65 years. PLWH were randomised 1:1:1 to receive NVX-CoV2373 on day 0 (D0) and either D21 (2-DoseD0/D21) or D70 (2-DoseD0/D70), or on D0, D21, and D70 (3-Dose). HIV-uninfected participants were randomised 1:1 to each 2-Dose regimen. PLWH were stratified into well-controlled and less–well-controlled subgroups. The primary immunologic endpoint included serum IgG and neutralising antibody responses (per geometric mean fold rise [GMFR] in titre and seroconversion rate) to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 at D35 (2-DoseD0/D21) and D84 (2-DoseD0/D70 and 3-Dose). The primary safety endpoints were participants with an unsolicited adverse event through D84, at D120, and at D180, or reactogenicity ≤7 days post-vaccination.
Results
Of 288 PLWH, 98, 96, and 94 were randomised into the 2-DoseD0/D21, 2-DoseD0/D70, and 3-Dose groups, respectively; 96 HIV-uninfected participants were randomised to the 2-DoseD0/D21 (n = 47) or 2-DoseD0/D70 (n = 49) regimens. Most (>85%) of the population were SARS-CoV-2 positive at baseline. Ancestral anti-spike IgG GMFRs in PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants, respectively, were 12·4 and 12·9 (D35) and 12·2 and 13·6 (D84). Comparable outcomes occurred across dosing regimens and in well-controlled and less–well-controlled PLWH. Microneutralization GMFRs at D84 in PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants, respectively, were: 6·9 and 10·1 (2-DoseD0/D21), 11·0 and 11·3 (2-DoseD0/D70), and 17·2 (PLWH 3-Dose). Antibody responses against BA.1 trended similar to those against the ancestral virus. Safety outcomes were comparable among PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that NVX-CoV2373 produced consistent immunogenicity responses to SARS-CoV-2 among PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants, with no new safety signals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection.
Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.