非自愿过程和自愿过程竞相进入工作记忆的注意力焦点。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1037/xlm0001374
Jiaofeng Li, Yubo Qiu, Weijie Guo, Huayu Liao, Mowei Shen, Zaifeng Gao
{"title":"非自愿过程和自愿过程竞相进入工作记忆的注意力焦点。","authors":"Jiaofeng Li, Yubo Qiu, Weijie Guo, Huayu Liao, Mowei Shen, Zaifeng Gao","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Representations in the focus of attention (FoA) of working memory (WM) have the highest activation state and processing privilege among representations in WM. There are two distinct processes for representations entering the FoA: involuntary and voluntary. The former is an automatic attentional response to stimuli, while the latter is directed by the central executive. Although extensive WM research has examined these processes individually, their interaction, particularly in competitive scenarios, remains poorly understood. To address this, we conducted experiments by displaying memorized stimuli that contain a color singleton to trigger an involuntary process, followed by a retro-cue in the WM maintenance phase to initiate a voluntary process. By manipulating the retro-cue validity, we probed how the singleton effect was modulated when the two processes had distinct targets. Our findings indicated that when the retro-cue validity was low, the singleton effect remained unaffected by a retro-cue directing to a nonsingleton target. However, when the retro-cue validity was high, the singleton effect was eliminated on reaction time, suggesting that involuntary and voluntary processes compete for a limited capacity of the FoA, with the stronger one prevailing in this competition. These findings illuminate the intricate interplay between involuntary and voluntary attentional processes in WM and offer critical insights into the nature and allocation mechanisms of the FoA. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Involuntary and voluntary processes compete for entering the focus of attention of working memory.\",\"authors\":\"Jiaofeng Li, Yubo Qiu, Weijie Guo, Huayu Liao, Mowei Shen, Zaifeng Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0001374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Representations in the focus of attention (FoA) of working memory (WM) have the highest activation state and processing privilege among representations in WM. There are two distinct processes for representations entering the FoA: involuntary and voluntary. The former is an automatic attentional response to stimuli, while the latter is directed by the central executive. Although extensive WM research has examined these processes individually, their interaction, particularly in competitive scenarios, remains poorly understood. To address this, we conducted experiments by displaying memorized stimuli that contain a color singleton to trigger an involuntary process, followed by a retro-cue in the WM maintenance phase to initiate a voluntary process. By manipulating the retro-cue validity, we probed how the singleton effect was modulated when the two processes had distinct targets. Our findings indicated that when the retro-cue validity was low, the singleton effect remained unaffected by a retro-cue directing to a nonsingleton target. However, when the retro-cue validity was high, the singleton effect was eliminated on reaction time, suggesting that involuntary and voluntary processes compete for a limited capacity of the FoA, with the stronger one prevailing in this competition. These findings illuminate the intricate interplay between involuntary and voluntary attentional processes in WM and offer critical insights into the nature and allocation mechanisms of the FoA. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在工作记忆(WM)的表征中,注意力焦点(FoA)中的表征具有最高的激活状态和处理特权。表征进入 FoA 有两个不同的过程:非自主和自主。前者是对刺激的自动注意反应,而后者则是由中央执行器引导的。尽管大量的 WM 研究已经对这两个过程进行了单独研究,但对它们之间的相互作用,尤其是在竞争情景中的相互作用,仍然知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一些实验,通过显示包含单个颜色的记忆性刺激来触发非自主过程,然后在 WM 维持阶段通过回溯提示来启动自主过程。通过操纵回溯线索的有效性,我们探究了当两个过程具有不同的目标时,单子效应是如何被调节的。我们的研究结果表明,当回溯线索有效性较低时,单子效应不受指向非单子目标的回溯线索的影响。然而,当回溯线索有效性较高时,单子效应对反应时间的影响被消除,这表明非自主和自主过程在争夺有限的FoA容量,而较强的过程在竞争中占上风。这些发现揭示了WM中非自主和自主注意过程之间错综复杂的相互作用,并对FoA的性质和分配机制提供了重要的启示。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Involuntary and voluntary processes compete for entering the focus of attention of working memory.

Representations in the focus of attention (FoA) of working memory (WM) have the highest activation state and processing privilege among representations in WM. There are two distinct processes for representations entering the FoA: involuntary and voluntary. The former is an automatic attentional response to stimuli, while the latter is directed by the central executive. Although extensive WM research has examined these processes individually, their interaction, particularly in competitive scenarios, remains poorly understood. To address this, we conducted experiments by displaying memorized stimuli that contain a color singleton to trigger an involuntary process, followed by a retro-cue in the WM maintenance phase to initiate a voluntary process. By manipulating the retro-cue validity, we probed how the singleton effect was modulated when the two processes had distinct targets. Our findings indicated that when the retro-cue validity was low, the singleton effect remained unaffected by a retro-cue directing to a nonsingleton target. However, when the retro-cue validity was high, the singleton effect was eliminated on reaction time, suggesting that involuntary and voluntary processes compete for a limited capacity of the FoA, with the stronger one prevailing in this competition. These findings illuminate the intricate interplay between involuntary and voluntary attentional processes in WM and offer critical insights into the nature and allocation mechanisms of the FoA. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1