小儿喂养障碍强化门诊项目:对当前挑战和未来方向的定性研究。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1097/DBP.0000000000001310
Navya Baranwal, Abby Hodges, Courtney E Breiner, Emily Malugen, Hayley H Estrem, William G Sharp, Nikhila Raol
{"title":"小儿喂养障碍强化门诊项目:对当前挑战和未来方向的定性研究。","authors":"Navya Baranwal, Abby Hodges, Courtney E Breiner, Emily Malugen, Hayley H Estrem, William G Sharp, Nikhila Raol","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although intensive multidisciplinary interventions (IMIs) provide benefits for patients with pediatric feeding disorders (PFD), access to these programs is limited and challenges faced by the programs remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better understand the barriers faced by existing day programs that provide IMI, disparities in patient care, and areas for improvement to better inform policy and improve access to treatment for PFD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a leader of outpatient programs providing IMI in the United States. Data regarding leader's perspectives on disparities in patient care, barriers faced by the intensive multidisciplinary feeding day programs, and future goals and directions for their programming were collected. Afterward, a qualitative content analysis was conducted to consolidate and categorize information related to patient care, access, and barriers faced by day programs and patients with PFD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers and challenges were identified at the patient, program, and systems levels. Patient-level barriers included familial resources or socioeconomic status, geographic distance from the program site, and difficulty with the time commitment, whereas program-level barriers included limited site personnel and capacity and long wait times. System-level barriers primarily center on insurance, with inconsistent coverage of services and limited payer knowledge about PFD and IMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IMIs are effective in managing PFD; however, a variety of patient-level, program-level, and systems-level factors serve as barriers for patient access to care and program success. Further research, improved reimbursement, and consensus statements on effective treatments can help improve access to and coverage for care, allowing for the development and sustainability of more programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensive Outpatient Programs for Pediatric Feeding Disorder: A Qualitative Study of Current Challenges and Future Directions.\",\"authors\":\"Navya Baranwal, Abby Hodges, Courtney E Breiner, Emily Malugen, Hayley H Estrem, William G Sharp, Nikhila Raol\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although intensive multidisciplinary interventions (IMIs) provide benefits for patients with pediatric feeding disorders (PFD), access to these programs is limited and challenges faced by the programs remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better understand the barriers faced by existing day programs that provide IMI, disparities in patient care, and areas for improvement to better inform policy and improve access to treatment for PFD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a leader of outpatient programs providing IMI in the United States. Data regarding leader's perspectives on disparities in patient care, barriers faced by the intensive multidisciplinary feeding day programs, and future goals and directions for their programming were collected. Afterward, a qualitative content analysis was conducted to consolidate and categorize information related to patient care, access, and barriers faced by day programs and patients with PFD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers and challenges were identified at the patient, program, and systems levels. Patient-level barriers included familial resources or socioeconomic status, geographic distance from the program site, and difficulty with the time commitment, whereas program-level barriers included limited site personnel and capacity and long wait times. System-level barriers primarily center on insurance, with inconsistent coverage of services and limited payer knowledge about PFD and IMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IMIs are effective in managing PFD; however, a variety of patient-level, program-level, and systems-level factors serve as barriers for patient access to care and program success. Further research, improved reimbursement, and consensus statements on effective treatments can help improve access to and coverage for care, allowing for the development and sustainability of more programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001310\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管多学科强化干预(IMIs)能为小儿喂养障碍(PFD)患者带来益处,但这些项目的可及性有限,且项目面临的挑战仍不明确:目的:更好地了解现有提供多学科综合干预的日间项目所面临的障碍、患者护理方面的差异以及需要改进的地方,以便更好地为政策提供信息,并改善 PFD 的治疗机会:对美国提供日间综合治疗的门诊项目负责人进行了半结构式访谈。收集的数据涉及领导者对患者护理差异的看法、多学科强化喂养日间项目面临的障碍以及项目的未来目标和方向。随后,进行了定性内容分析,以整合和归类与患者护理、获取途径以及日间项目和 PFD 患者面临的障碍有关的信息:结果:在患者、项目和系统层面都发现了障碍和挑战。患者层面的障碍包括家庭资源或社会经济状况、与项目地点的地理距离以及时间承诺方面的困难,而项目层面的障碍包括项目地点人员和能力有限以及等待时间过长。系统层面的障碍主要集中在保险方面,服务覆盖范围不一致,支付方对PFD和IMI的了解有限:IMI可有效管理PFD;然而,患者层面、项目层面和系统层面的各种因素成为患者获得护理和项目成功的障碍。进一步的研究、提高报销额度以及就有效治疗方法达成共识有助于改善患者获得治疗的机会并扩大治疗范围,从而使更多项目得以发展和持续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intensive Outpatient Programs for Pediatric Feeding Disorder: A Qualitative Study of Current Challenges and Future Directions.

Background: Although intensive multidisciplinary interventions (IMIs) provide benefits for patients with pediatric feeding disorders (PFD), access to these programs is limited and challenges faced by the programs remain unclear.

Objective: To better understand the barriers faced by existing day programs that provide IMI, disparities in patient care, and areas for improvement to better inform policy and improve access to treatment for PFD.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a leader of outpatient programs providing IMI in the United States. Data regarding leader's perspectives on disparities in patient care, barriers faced by the intensive multidisciplinary feeding day programs, and future goals and directions for their programming were collected. Afterward, a qualitative content analysis was conducted to consolidate and categorize information related to patient care, access, and barriers faced by day programs and patients with PFD.

Results: Barriers and challenges were identified at the patient, program, and systems levels. Patient-level barriers included familial resources or socioeconomic status, geographic distance from the program site, and difficulty with the time commitment, whereas program-level barriers included limited site personnel and capacity and long wait times. System-level barriers primarily center on insurance, with inconsistent coverage of services and limited payer knowledge about PFD and IMI.

Conclusion: IMIs are effective in managing PFD; however, a variety of patient-level, program-level, and systems-level factors serve as barriers for patient access to care and program success. Further research, improved reimbursement, and consensus statements on effective treatments can help improve access to and coverage for care, allowing for the development and sustainability of more programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
期刊最新文献
Nocebo Effect on Pain Perception and Attention with Children With and Without Attention Deficit And/Or Hyperactivity Disorder. Associations Between Sleep Health and Child Behavior at Age 6 Years in the INSIGHT Study. Teletherapy and Medication Management of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder with Co-occurring Internalizing Symptoms and Suicidality During the Pandemic. Boosting Autism Screening and Referrals with EHR-Integrated Tools at Well-Child Visits. Challenging Case: Family Navigation for Autism Spectrum Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1