Shuai Lin , Ming Xue , Jiali Sun , Chang Xu , Tianqi Wang , Jianxiu Lian , Min Lv , Ping Yang , Chenjun Sheng , Zijian Cheng , Wei Wang
{"title":"用于预测临床前阿尔茨海默病的疾病转变时间和风险分层的核磁共振成像放射组学提名图。","authors":"Shuai Lin , Ming Xue , Jiali Sun , Chang Xu , Tianqi Wang , Jianxiu Lian , Min Lv , Ping Yang , Chenjun Sheng , Zijian Cheng , Wei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Accurate prediction of the progression of preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for improving clinical management and disease prognosis. The objective of this study was to develop and validate clinical-radimoics integrated model to predict the time to progression (TTP) and disease risk stratification of preclinical AD.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A total of 244 cases (mean age: 73.8 ± 5.5 years, 120 women) from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 172) and validation cohort (n = 72) using a 7:3 ratio. Clinical factors were identified by univariate and multivariate COX regression. Radiomics features were extracted from GM, WM and CSF of T<sub>1</sub>WI images and selected by Spearman correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Using selected clinical factors and radiomics features, the clinical, radimocis and clinical-radiomics nomogram models were developed for predicting the TTP. The performance of each model was assessed by C-index. The risk stratification ability and predicting efficacy of the clinical-radiomics model were utilizing the Kaplan-Meier curve and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The C-index of clinical, radimocis and clinical-radiomics models were 0.852 (95% confidence interval[CI]:0.810–0.893), 0.863 (95%CI:0.816–0.910) and 0.903 (95%:0.870–0.936) in the training cohort and 0.725 (95%CI:0.630–0.820), 0.788 (95%CI:0.678–0.898), 0.813(95%CI:0.734–0.892) in the validation cohort. The AUCs of the multi-predictor nomogram at 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year were 0.894, 0.908, 0.930, 0.979 in the training cohort and 0.671, 0.726, 0.839, 0.931 in the validation cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this study, we constructed a clinical-radimoics integrated model to predict the progression of preclinical AD and stratified the risk of disease progression in preclinical AD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 2","pages":"Pages 951-962"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Disease Transition Time and Risk Stratification in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease\",\"authors\":\"Shuai Lin , Ming Xue , Jiali Sun , Chang Xu , Tianqi Wang , Jianxiu Lian , Min Lv , Ping Yang , Chenjun Sheng , Zijian Cheng , Wei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Accurate prediction of the progression of preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for improving clinical management and disease prognosis. The objective of this study was to develop and validate clinical-radimoics integrated model to predict the time to progression (TTP) and disease risk stratification of preclinical AD.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A total of 244 cases (mean age: 73.8 ± 5.5 years, 120 women) from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 172) and validation cohort (n = 72) using a 7:3 ratio. Clinical factors were identified by univariate and multivariate COX regression. Radiomics features were extracted from GM, WM and CSF of T<sub>1</sub>WI images and selected by Spearman correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Using selected clinical factors and radiomics features, the clinical, radimocis and clinical-radiomics nomogram models were developed for predicting the TTP. The performance of each model was assessed by C-index. The risk stratification ability and predicting efficacy of the clinical-radiomics model were utilizing the Kaplan-Meier curve and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The C-index of clinical, radimocis and clinical-radiomics models were 0.852 (95% confidence interval[CI]:0.810–0.893), 0.863 (95%CI:0.816–0.910) and 0.903 (95%:0.870–0.936) in the training cohort and 0.725 (95%CI:0.630–0.820), 0.788 (95%CI:0.678–0.898), 0.813(95%CI:0.734–0.892) in the validation cohort. The AUCs of the multi-predictor nomogram at 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year were 0.894, 0.908, 0.930, 0.979 in the training cohort and 0.671, 0.726, 0.839, 0.931 in the validation cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this study, we constructed a clinical-radimoics integrated model to predict the progression of preclinical AD and stratified the risk of disease progression in preclinical AD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 951-962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224006469\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224006469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
MRI Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Disease Transition Time and Risk Stratification in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease
Rationale and Objectives
Accurate prediction of the progression of preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for improving clinical management and disease prognosis. The objective of this study was to develop and validate clinical-radimoics integrated model to predict the time to progression (TTP) and disease risk stratification of preclinical AD.
Materials and Methods
A total of 244 cases (mean age: 73.8 ± 5.5 years, 120 women) from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 172) and validation cohort (n = 72) using a 7:3 ratio. Clinical factors were identified by univariate and multivariate COX regression. Radiomics features were extracted from GM, WM and CSF of T1WI images and selected by Spearman correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Using selected clinical factors and radiomics features, the clinical, radimocis and clinical-radiomics nomogram models were developed for predicting the TTP. The performance of each model was assessed by C-index. The risk stratification ability and predicting efficacy of the clinical-radiomics model were utilizing the Kaplan-Meier curve and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results
The C-index of clinical, radimocis and clinical-radiomics models were 0.852 (95% confidence interval[CI]:0.810–0.893), 0.863 (95%CI:0.816–0.910) and 0.903 (95%:0.870–0.936) in the training cohort and 0.725 (95%CI:0.630–0.820), 0.788 (95%CI:0.678–0.898), 0.813(95%CI:0.734–0.892) in the validation cohort. The AUCs of the multi-predictor nomogram at 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year were 0.894, 0.908, 0.930, 0.979 in the training cohort and 0.671, 0.726, 0.839, 0.931 in the validation cohort.
Conclusion
In this study, we constructed a clinical-radimoics integrated model to predict the progression of preclinical AD and stratified the risk of disease progression in preclinical AD.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.