按性取向和性别认同划分的自述社会风险因素的不平等。

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3176
Kevin H Nguyen, Timothy W Levengood, Allegra R Gordon, Leesh Menard, Heidi L Allen, Gilbert Gonzales
{"title":"按性取向和性别认同划分的自述社会风险因素的不平等。","authors":"Kevin H Nguyen, Timothy W Levengood, Allegra R Gordon, Leesh Menard, Heidi L Allen, Gilbert Gonzales","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Sexual minority (ie, people who self-identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, and other nonheterosexual identities) and gender minority (ie, people who self-identify as transgender, nonbinary, or other noncisgender identities) adults report worse health outcomes compared with heterosexual and cisgender adults, respectively. Although social risk factors (SRFs; eg, housing instability) are associated with health outcomes, little is known about the prevalence of SRFs among sexual and gender minority adults.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine differences in the prevalence of SRFs by sexual orientation and gender identity among adults.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data collected from January 2022 to February 2023 for adults aged 18 years or older residing in 22 US states.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Self-reported sexual orientation and gender identity.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Outcome measures were dissatisfaction with life, lack of emotional support, social isolation, employment loss in the past 12 months, Supplementary Nutrition Assistance Program participation in the past 12 months, insufficient food, inability to pay bills, inability to pay utilities, lack of transportation, and stress. Survey weights were applied. Multivariable linear regression models were used to measure the association between sexual orientation and gender identity for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample comparing outcomes by sexual orientation included 178 803 individuals: 84 881 men (48.5%; 92.9% heterosexual; 7.1% sexual minority) and 93 922 women (51.5%; 89.4% heterosexual; 10.6% sexual minority). The study sample comparing outcomes by gender identity included 182 690 adults (99.2% cisgender; 0.8% gender minority). Of sexual minority women, 58.1% reported at least 1 SRF compared with 36.5% of heterosexual women. Sexual minority women were significantly more likely to report social isolation (difference, 7.4 percentage points [PP]; 95% CI, 4.9-10.0 PP) and stress (difference, 12.2 PP; 95% CI, 9.8-14.7 PP) compared with heterosexual women. A greater proportion of sexual minority men (51.1%) reported at least 1 SRF than heterosexual men (34.0%); the largest magnitudes of inequity were in dissatisfaction with life (difference, 7.9 PP; 95% CI, 5.8-10.1 PP) and stress (difference, 6.7 PP; 95% CI, 4.5-8.9 PP). Of gender minority adults, 64.1% reported at least 1 SRF compared with cisgender adults (37.1%). Gender minority adults were significantly more likely to report social isolation (difference, 14.8 PP; 95% CI, 9.9-19.7 PP) and stress (difference, 17.0 PP; 95% CI, 11.9-22.1 PP).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, sexual and gender minority adults were significantly more likely to report multiple SRFs. These findings suggest that policies and community-based systems to advance socioeconomic equity among sexual and gender minority adults are critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"5 9","pages":"e243176"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequities in Self-Reported Social Risk Factors by Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin H Nguyen, Timothy W Levengood, Allegra R Gordon, Leesh Menard, Heidi L Allen, Gilbert Gonzales\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Sexual minority (ie, people who self-identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, and other nonheterosexual identities) and gender minority (ie, people who self-identify as transgender, nonbinary, or other noncisgender identities) adults report worse health outcomes compared with heterosexual and cisgender adults, respectively. Although social risk factors (SRFs; eg, housing instability) are associated with health outcomes, little is known about the prevalence of SRFs among sexual and gender minority adults.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine differences in the prevalence of SRFs by sexual orientation and gender identity among adults.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data collected from January 2022 to February 2023 for adults aged 18 years or older residing in 22 US states.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Self-reported sexual orientation and gender identity.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Outcome measures were dissatisfaction with life, lack of emotional support, social isolation, employment loss in the past 12 months, Supplementary Nutrition Assistance Program participation in the past 12 months, insufficient food, inability to pay bills, inability to pay utilities, lack of transportation, and stress. Survey weights were applied. Multivariable linear regression models were used to measure the association between sexual orientation and gender identity for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample comparing outcomes by sexual orientation included 178 803 individuals: 84 881 men (48.5%; 92.9% heterosexual; 7.1% sexual minority) and 93 922 women (51.5%; 89.4% heterosexual; 10.6% sexual minority). The study sample comparing outcomes by gender identity included 182 690 adults (99.2% cisgender; 0.8% gender minority). Of sexual minority women, 58.1% reported at least 1 SRF compared with 36.5% of heterosexual women. Sexual minority women were significantly more likely to report social isolation (difference, 7.4 percentage points [PP]; 95% CI, 4.9-10.0 PP) and stress (difference, 12.2 PP; 95% CI, 9.8-14.7 PP) compared with heterosexual women. A greater proportion of sexual minority men (51.1%) reported at least 1 SRF than heterosexual men (34.0%); the largest magnitudes of inequity were in dissatisfaction with life (difference, 7.9 PP; 95% CI, 5.8-10.1 PP) and stress (difference, 6.7 PP; 95% CI, 4.5-8.9 PP). Of gender minority adults, 64.1% reported at least 1 SRF compared with cisgender adults (37.1%). Gender minority adults were significantly more likely to report social isolation (difference, 14.8 PP; 95% CI, 9.9-19.7 PP) and stress (difference, 17.0 PP; 95% CI, 11.9-22.1 PP).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, sexual and gender minority adults were significantly more likely to report multiple SRFs. These findings suggest that policies and community-based systems to advance socioeconomic equity among sexual and gender minority adults are critical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"e243176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437382/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:性少数群体(即自我认同为男同性恋、女同性恋、双性恋和其他非异性恋身份的人)和性别少数群体(即自我认同为变性人、非二元性人或其他非双性人身份的人)成年人的健康状况分别比异性恋成年人和同性成年人差。尽管社会风险因素(SRFs;如住房不稳定性)与健康结果有关,但人们对性少数群体和性别少数群体成年人中 SRFs 的发生率知之甚少:目的:根据性取向和性别认同,研究社会风险因素在成年人中的流行率差异:这项横断面研究使用了行为风险因素监测系统在 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 2 月期间收集的数据,对象是居住在美国 22 个州的 18 岁或以上成年人:主要结果和测量指标:对生活不满意、缺乏情感支持、社会孤立、过去 12 个月内失业、过去 12 个月内参加补充营养援助计划、食物不足、无力支付账单、无力支付水电费、缺乏交通工具和压力。采用了调查权重。采用多变量线性回归模型来衡量性取向和性别认同在每项结果中的关联性:按性取向比较结果的研究样本包括 178 803 人:其中男性 84 881 人(48.5%;92.9% 为异性恋;7.1% 为性少数群体),女性 93 922 人(51.5%;89.4% 为异性恋;10.6% 为性少数群体)。按性别认同比较结果的研究样本包括 182 690 名成年人(99.2% 为顺性性别;0.8% 为性少数群体)。在性少数群体妇女中,58.1%的人报告至少有一次性权利障碍,而在异性恋妇女中,这一比例为 36.5%。与异性恋女性相比,性少数群体女性更有可能报告社会隔离(差异为 7.4 个百分点 [PP];95% CI,4.9-10.0 个百分点)和压力(差异为 12.2 个百分点;95% CI,9.8-14.7 个百分点)。与异性恋男性(34.0%)相比,性少数群体男性(51.1%)报告至少有 1 个 SRF 的比例更高;不平等程度最大的是对生活不满意(差异,7.9 PP;95% CI,5.8-10.1 PP)和压力(差异,6.7 PP;95% CI,4.5-8.9 PP)。在性别上属于少数群体的成年人中,64.1% 的人至少报告了 1 次 SRF,而在性别上属于同性别的成年人中,这一比例仅为 37.1%。性别少数群体成年人更有可能报告社会隔离(差异为 14.8 PP;95% CI,9.9-19.7 PP)和压力(差异为 17.0 PP;95% CI,11.9-22.1 PP):在这项横断面研究中,性少数群体和性别少数群体成年人更有可能报告多种性健康和生殖健康问题。这些研究结果表明,在性少数群体和性别少数群体成年人中促进社会经济公平的政策和社区系统至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inequities in Self-Reported Social Risk Factors by Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.

Importance: Sexual minority (ie, people who self-identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, and other nonheterosexual identities) and gender minority (ie, people who self-identify as transgender, nonbinary, or other noncisgender identities) adults report worse health outcomes compared with heterosexual and cisgender adults, respectively. Although social risk factors (SRFs; eg, housing instability) are associated with health outcomes, little is known about the prevalence of SRFs among sexual and gender minority adults.

Objective: To examine differences in the prevalence of SRFs by sexual orientation and gender identity among adults.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data collected from January 2022 to February 2023 for adults aged 18 years or older residing in 22 US states.

Exposure: Self-reported sexual orientation and gender identity.

Main outcomes and measures: Outcome measures were dissatisfaction with life, lack of emotional support, social isolation, employment loss in the past 12 months, Supplementary Nutrition Assistance Program participation in the past 12 months, insufficient food, inability to pay bills, inability to pay utilities, lack of transportation, and stress. Survey weights were applied. Multivariable linear regression models were used to measure the association between sexual orientation and gender identity for each outcome.

Results: The study sample comparing outcomes by sexual orientation included 178 803 individuals: 84 881 men (48.5%; 92.9% heterosexual; 7.1% sexual minority) and 93 922 women (51.5%; 89.4% heterosexual; 10.6% sexual minority). The study sample comparing outcomes by gender identity included 182 690 adults (99.2% cisgender; 0.8% gender minority). Of sexual minority women, 58.1% reported at least 1 SRF compared with 36.5% of heterosexual women. Sexual minority women were significantly more likely to report social isolation (difference, 7.4 percentage points [PP]; 95% CI, 4.9-10.0 PP) and stress (difference, 12.2 PP; 95% CI, 9.8-14.7 PP) compared with heterosexual women. A greater proportion of sexual minority men (51.1%) reported at least 1 SRF than heterosexual men (34.0%); the largest magnitudes of inequity were in dissatisfaction with life (difference, 7.9 PP; 95% CI, 5.8-10.1 PP) and stress (difference, 6.7 PP; 95% CI, 4.5-8.9 PP). Of gender minority adults, 64.1% reported at least 1 SRF compared with cisgender adults (37.1%). Gender minority adults were significantly more likely to report social isolation (difference, 14.8 PP; 95% CI, 9.9-19.7 PP) and stress (difference, 17.0 PP; 95% CI, 11.9-22.1 PP).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study, sexual and gender minority adults were significantly more likely to report multiple SRFs. These findings suggest that policies and community-based systems to advance socioeconomic equity among sexual and gender minority adults are critical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Cannabis Use During Early Pregnancy Following Recreational Cannabis Legalization. Change of Ownership and Quality of Home Health Agency Care. Errors in Conflict of Interest Disclosures. JAMA Health Forum. Surgeon Workforce in Underserved Communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1