选民支持将与儿童健康相关的政策作为全国竞选活动的优先事项。

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3305
Stephen W Patrick, Sarah F Loch, Elizabeth McNeer, Matthew M Davis
{"title":"选民支持将与儿童健康相关的政策作为全国竞选活动的优先事项。","authors":"Stephen W Patrick, Sarah F Loch, Elizabeth McNeer, Matthew M Davis","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Policies that are associated with child health are rarely included in platforms of candidates for national political office. Candidates may underrecognize voter support for such priorities or perceive that such policy issues are not sufficiently divisive to appeal to partisan voters. Key policy questions associated with child health may be considered by the next Congress, including the consistency of Medicaid coverage across states and restoring the recently lapsed refundable child tax credit.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine voter support for candidates regarding policies that are associated with child health.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This nationally representative survey of registered US voters 18 years or older was conducted from March to April 2024 and included a survey-based randomized experiment to evaluate the association of message framing with voter support.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Messages conveying distinct rationales for Medicaid reform and refundable child tax credit.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Likely or definite support for candidates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this sample (unweighted N = 2014; 1015 women [51.0%]), most respondents indicated they would likely or definitely vote for candidates who expressed strong support for all tested policies: extreme risk protection order (79.5%), school threat assessment (73.1%), expanded childcare (69.6%), refundable child tax credit (66.6%), federalization of Medicaid (66.0%), paid parental leave (65.5%), free school meals (65.6%), safe firearm storage and enforcement (62.9%), preventing Medicaid disenrollment for children younger than 6 years (61.9%), universal free preschool (61.6%), and summer nutrition programs (57.9%). More women than men expressed support for all tested policies. Strong majorities of Democrat and Independent voters would support candidates who endorsed child-focused policies; fewer than 50% of Republican voters expressed such support, except for the extreme risk protection order and school threat assessment. Variations in framing language regarding consistent Medicaid coverage across states were not associated with amplified or diminished voter support. Framing the refundable child tax credit as benefiting \"hard-working\" vs \"low-income\" families garnered significantly more support among men (67.0% vs 59.0%), privately insured individuals (72.0% vs 64.4%), and Republicans (54.6% vs 43.0%; all P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The study results suggest that most voters favor candidates who strongly support policies that are associated with child health. Voter support differs substantively by gender and political party affiliation and may be associated with language choices in messaging about policy change.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"5 9","pages":"e243305"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voter Support for Policies Associated With Child Health as National Campaign Priorities.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen W Patrick, Sarah F Loch, Elizabeth McNeer, Matthew M Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Policies that are associated with child health are rarely included in platforms of candidates for national political office. Candidates may underrecognize voter support for such priorities or perceive that such policy issues are not sufficiently divisive to appeal to partisan voters. Key policy questions associated with child health may be considered by the next Congress, including the consistency of Medicaid coverage across states and restoring the recently lapsed refundable child tax credit.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine voter support for candidates regarding policies that are associated with child health.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This nationally representative survey of registered US voters 18 years or older was conducted from March to April 2024 and included a survey-based randomized experiment to evaluate the association of message framing with voter support.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Messages conveying distinct rationales for Medicaid reform and refundable child tax credit.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Likely or definite support for candidates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this sample (unweighted N = 2014; 1015 women [51.0%]), most respondents indicated they would likely or definitely vote for candidates who expressed strong support for all tested policies: extreme risk protection order (79.5%), school threat assessment (73.1%), expanded childcare (69.6%), refundable child tax credit (66.6%), federalization of Medicaid (66.0%), paid parental leave (65.5%), free school meals (65.6%), safe firearm storage and enforcement (62.9%), preventing Medicaid disenrollment for children younger than 6 years (61.9%), universal free preschool (61.6%), and summer nutrition programs (57.9%). More women than men expressed support for all tested policies. Strong majorities of Democrat and Independent voters would support candidates who endorsed child-focused policies; fewer than 50% of Republican voters expressed such support, except for the extreme risk protection order and school threat assessment. Variations in framing language regarding consistent Medicaid coverage across states were not associated with amplified or diminished voter support. Framing the refundable child tax credit as benefiting \\\"hard-working\\\" vs \\\"low-income\\\" families garnered significantly more support among men (67.0% vs 59.0%), privately insured individuals (72.0% vs 64.4%), and Republicans (54.6% vs 43.0%; all P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The study results suggest that most voters favor candidates who strongly support policies that are associated with child health. Voter support differs substantively by gender and political party affiliation and may be associated with language choices in messaging about policy change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"e243305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437383/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:与儿童健康相关的政策很少被列入国家政治职位候选人的政纲。候选人可能没有充分认识到选民对此类优先事项的支持,或者认为此类政策问题不足以造成分裂,无法吸引党派选民。下一届国会可能会考虑与儿童健康相关的关键政策问题,包括各州医疗补助计划覆盖范围的一致性以及恢复最近失效的可退还儿童税收抵免:研究选民对儿童健康相关政策候选人的支持情况:这项具有全国代表性的调查是在 2024 年 3 月至 4 月期间进行的,调查对象为 18 岁或以上的美国登记选民,其中包括一项基于调查的随机实验,以评估信息框架与选民支持率之间的关联:主要结果和衡量标准:结果:在该样本中(未加权 N = 2014;1015 名女性 [51.0%]),大多数受访者表示他们可能或肯定会投票给表示强烈支持所有测试政策的候选人:极端风险保护令(79.5%)、学校威胁评估(73.1%)、扩大儿童保育(69.6%)、可退还儿童税收抵免(66.6%)、医疗补助联邦化(66.0%)、带薪育儿假(65.5%)、免费校餐(65.6%)、安全枪支储存和执行(62.9%)、防止 6 岁以下儿童退出医疗补助(61.9%)、普及免费学前教育(61.6%)和夏季营养计划(57.9%)。对所有测试政策表示支持的女性多于男性。绝大多数民主党和独立党选民支持支持以儿童为重点的政策的候选人;除极端风险保护令和学校威胁评估外,只有不到50%的共和党选民表示支持。各州关于医疗补助计划覆盖范围一致的框架语言差异与选民支持率的扩大或减小无关。将可退税儿童税收抵免的受益对象界定为 "努力工作 "家庭与 "低收入 "家庭,在男性(67.0% 对 59.0%)、私人投保人(72.0% 对 64.4%)和共和党人(54.6% 对 43.0%;均为 P)中获得的支持率明显更高:研究结果表明,大多数选民倾向于大力支持与儿童健康相关政策的候选人。不同性别和党派的选民支持率有很大差异,这可能与政策变化信息的语言选择有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Voter Support for Policies Associated With Child Health as National Campaign Priorities.

Importance: Policies that are associated with child health are rarely included in platforms of candidates for national political office. Candidates may underrecognize voter support for such priorities or perceive that such policy issues are not sufficiently divisive to appeal to partisan voters. Key policy questions associated with child health may be considered by the next Congress, including the consistency of Medicaid coverage across states and restoring the recently lapsed refundable child tax credit.

Objective: To examine voter support for candidates regarding policies that are associated with child health.

Design, setting, and participants: This nationally representative survey of registered US voters 18 years or older was conducted from March to April 2024 and included a survey-based randomized experiment to evaluate the association of message framing with voter support.

Exposures: Messages conveying distinct rationales for Medicaid reform and refundable child tax credit.

Main outcomes and measures: Likely or definite support for candidates.

Results: In this sample (unweighted N = 2014; 1015 women [51.0%]), most respondents indicated they would likely or definitely vote for candidates who expressed strong support for all tested policies: extreme risk protection order (79.5%), school threat assessment (73.1%), expanded childcare (69.6%), refundable child tax credit (66.6%), federalization of Medicaid (66.0%), paid parental leave (65.5%), free school meals (65.6%), safe firearm storage and enforcement (62.9%), preventing Medicaid disenrollment for children younger than 6 years (61.9%), universal free preschool (61.6%), and summer nutrition programs (57.9%). More women than men expressed support for all tested policies. Strong majorities of Democrat and Independent voters would support candidates who endorsed child-focused policies; fewer than 50% of Republican voters expressed such support, except for the extreme risk protection order and school threat assessment. Variations in framing language regarding consistent Medicaid coverage across states were not associated with amplified or diminished voter support. Framing the refundable child tax credit as benefiting "hard-working" vs "low-income" families garnered significantly more support among men (67.0% vs 59.0%), privately insured individuals (72.0% vs 64.4%), and Republicans (54.6% vs 43.0%; all P < .05).

Conclusions and relevance: The study results suggest that most voters favor candidates who strongly support policies that are associated with child health. Voter support differs substantively by gender and political party affiliation and may be associated with language choices in messaging about policy change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Cannabis Use During Early Pregnancy Following Recreational Cannabis Legalization. Change of Ownership and Quality of Home Health Agency Care. Errors in Conflict of Interest Disclosures. JAMA Health Forum. Surgeon Workforce in Underserved Communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1