根深蒂固的机会:医疗补助、医疗系统和无家可归问题的解决方案。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1215/03616878-11567700
Charley Willison, Naquia Unwala, Katarzyna Klasa
{"title":"根深蒂固的机会:医疗补助、医疗系统和无家可归问题的解决方案。","authors":"Charley Willison, Naquia Unwala, Katarzyna Klasa","doi":"10.1215/03616878-11567700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>As inequality grows, politically powerful healthcare institutions - namely Medicaid and health systems - are increasingly assuming social policy roles, particularly solutions to housing and homelessness. Medicaid and health systems regularly interact with persons experiencing homelessness who are high utilizers of emergency health-services, and experience frequent loss of/inability to access Medicaid services, resulting from homelessness. This research examines Medicaid and health system responses to homelessness, why they may work to address homelessness, and the mechanisms by which this occurs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary data were collected from Medicaid policies and the 100 largest health systems and national survey data from local homeless policy systems to assess scope, and measure mechanisms and factors influencing decision-making.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nearly one-third of states have Medicaid Waivers targeting homelessness and over half of the 100 largest health systems have homeless mitigation programs. Most Medicaid Waivers use local homeless policy structures as implementing entities. A plurality of health systems rationalize program existence based on the failure of existing structures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Entrenched healthcare institutions may bolster local homeless policy governance mechanisms and policy efficacy. Reliance on health systems as alternative structures, and implementing entities in Medicaid Waivers, may risk shifting homeless policy governance and retrenchment of existing systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entrenched Opportunity: Medicaid, Health Systems, and Solutions to Homelessness.\",\"authors\":\"Charley Willison, Naquia Unwala, Katarzyna Klasa\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/03616878-11567700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>As inequality grows, politically powerful healthcare institutions - namely Medicaid and health systems - are increasingly assuming social policy roles, particularly solutions to housing and homelessness. Medicaid and health systems regularly interact with persons experiencing homelessness who are high utilizers of emergency health-services, and experience frequent loss of/inability to access Medicaid services, resulting from homelessness. This research examines Medicaid and health system responses to homelessness, why they may work to address homelessness, and the mechanisms by which this occurs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary data were collected from Medicaid policies and the 100 largest health systems and national survey data from local homeless policy systems to assess scope, and measure mechanisms and factors influencing decision-making.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nearly one-third of states have Medicaid Waivers targeting homelessness and over half of the 100 largest health systems have homeless mitigation programs. Most Medicaid Waivers use local homeless policy structures as implementing entities. A plurality of health systems rationalize program existence based on the failure of existing structures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Entrenched healthcare institutions may bolster local homeless policy governance mechanisms and policy efficacy. Reliance on health systems as alternative structures, and implementing entities in Medicaid Waivers, may risk shifting homeless policy governance and retrenchment of existing systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11567700\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11567700","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着不平等现象的加剧,政治上强大的医疗保健机构--即医疗补助计划和医疗系统--越来越多地承担起社会政策的角色,特别是解决住房和无家可归问题。医疗补助计划和医疗系统经常与无家可归者打交道,他们是紧急医疗服务的高使用率者,并且经常因无家可归而失去或无法获得医疗补助计划的服务。本研究探讨了医疗补助计划和医疗系统对无家可归者的应对措施,这些措施为何能解决无家可归者的问题,以及解决这些问题的机制:方法:从医疗补助政策和 100 个最大的医疗系统收集原始数据,并从地方无家可归者政策系统收集全国性调查数据,以评估范围,并衡量影响决策的机制和因素:近三分之一的州拥有针对无家可归者的医疗补助豁免,100 个最大的医疗系统中有一半以上拥有无家可归者缓解计划。大多数医疗补助豁免计划都将当地的无家可归者政策机构作为实施实体。多数医疗系统以现有机构的失败为由,将计划的存在合理化:结论:根深蒂固的医疗保健机构可以加强当地无家可归者政策的管理机制和政策效力。依赖医疗系统作为替代结构和医疗补助豁免计划的实施实体,可能会导致无家可归者政策管理的转移和现有系统的缩减。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Entrenched Opportunity: Medicaid, Health Systems, and Solutions to Homelessness.

Context: As inequality grows, politically powerful healthcare institutions - namely Medicaid and health systems - are increasingly assuming social policy roles, particularly solutions to housing and homelessness. Medicaid and health systems regularly interact with persons experiencing homelessness who are high utilizers of emergency health-services, and experience frequent loss of/inability to access Medicaid services, resulting from homelessness. This research examines Medicaid and health system responses to homelessness, why they may work to address homelessness, and the mechanisms by which this occurs.

Methods: Primary data were collected from Medicaid policies and the 100 largest health systems and national survey data from local homeless policy systems to assess scope, and measure mechanisms and factors influencing decision-making.

Findings: Nearly one-third of states have Medicaid Waivers targeting homelessness and over half of the 100 largest health systems have homeless mitigation programs. Most Medicaid Waivers use local homeless policy structures as implementing entities. A plurality of health systems rationalize program existence based on the failure of existing structures.

Conclusions: Entrenched healthcare institutions may bolster local homeless policy governance mechanisms and policy efficacy. Reliance on health systems as alternative structures, and implementing entities in Medicaid Waivers, may risk shifting homeless policy governance and retrenchment of existing systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1