[留尼汪岛妇女希望如何进行阴道取样 HPV 检测,作为宫颈癌筛查的一部分?]

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.gofs.2024.09.004
Marilou Chemineau, Natacha Odelin, Laurianne Reitz, Antoine Bertolotti, Vincent Balaya, Malik Boukerrou, Phuong Lien Tran
{"title":"[留尼汪岛妇女希望如何进行阴道取样 HPV 检测,作为宫颈癌筛查的一部分?]","authors":"Marilou Chemineau, Natacha Odelin, Laurianne Reitz, Antoine Bertolotti, Vincent Balaya, Malik Boukerrou, Phuong Lien Tran","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the introduction of HPV testing as a first-line screening method for women aged 30 and over, vaginal sampling (VS) by a healthcare professional or self-sampling (SS) is now possible for women who have not responded to the organized screening program using cervical uterine sampling. The aim of this study was to understand the choices made by a sample of women from La Reunion would like to perform their VS, and the content of the instructions they would like to receive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study using a single-answer questionnaire. Patients were either interviewed in doctors' office or offered the possibility to answer an online questionnaire. We included women aged 30 to 65 in La Reunion who were concerned by CC screening. We compared the answers of women who were up to date with their screening with those of women who were not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 202 women. The study showed that 64.9% of patients wished to collect the VS kit from a healthcare professional, 80.8% wished to perform SS and 52.5% wished to return it to the laboratory. The preferred language of the instruction was French, with pictures and drawings for 48.5% of patients. There was no significant difference between the answers of women who were up to date with their screening and those who were not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a sample of women eligible for CC screening in La Reunion, the preferred methods for CC screening were to collect the PV kit from a healthcare professional, perform the SS at home and then return it to the laboratory. These responses differed from other studies. A feasibility study on a part of La Reunion's eligible population for CC screening would enable us to assess the feasibility and generalizability of a screening modality based on SS.</p>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[How do women in Réunion Island want to perform HPV test on vaginal sampling as part of cervical cancer screening?]\",\"authors\":\"Marilou Chemineau, Natacha Odelin, Laurianne Reitz, Antoine Bertolotti, Vincent Balaya, Malik Boukerrou, Phuong Lien Tran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gofs.2024.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the introduction of HPV testing as a first-line screening method for women aged 30 and over, vaginal sampling (VS) by a healthcare professional or self-sampling (SS) is now possible for women who have not responded to the organized screening program using cervical uterine sampling. The aim of this study was to understand the choices made by a sample of women from La Reunion would like to perform their VS, and the content of the instructions they would like to receive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study using a single-answer questionnaire. Patients were either interviewed in doctors' office or offered the possibility to answer an online questionnaire. We included women aged 30 to 65 in La Reunion who were concerned by CC screening. We compared the answers of women who were up to date with their screening with those of women who were not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 202 women. The study showed that 64.9% of patients wished to collect the VS kit from a healthcare professional, 80.8% wished to perform SS and 52.5% wished to return it to the laboratory. The preferred language of the instruction was French, with pictures and drawings for 48.5% of patients. There was no significant difference between the answers of women who were up to date with their screening and those who were not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a sample of women eligible for CC screening in La Reunion, the preferred methods for CC screening were to collect the PV kit from a healthcare professional, perform the SS at home and then return it to the laboratory. These responses differed from other studies. A feasibility study on a part of La Reunion's eligible population for CC screening would enable us to assess the feasibility and generalizability of a screening modality based on SS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2024.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2024.09.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自从将人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测作为30岁及以上女性的一线筛查方法以来,对于那些对宫颈子宫取样的有组织筛查计划没有反应的女性来说,现在可以由专业医护人员进行阴道取样(VS)或自我取样(SS)。本研究的目的是了解留尼旺妇女在进行 VS 时的选择以及她们希望得到的指导内容:我们采用单一答案问卷进行了一项横断面描述性研究。患者可以在医生办公室接受访谈,也可以回答在线问卷。我们的研究对象包括留尼旺岛年龄在30至65岁之间、关注CC筛查的女性。我们对已完成筛查和未完成筛查的妇女的回答进行了比较:我们共纳入了 202 名妇女。研究结果显示,64.9%的患者希望从医护人员处领取VS试剂盒,80.8%的患者希望进行SS检查,52.5%的患者希望将试剂盒交回实验室。48.5%的患者希望使用法语和图画进行指导。已完成筛查和未完成筛查的妇女的回答没有明显差异:结论:在留尼旺符合CC筛查条件的妇女样本中,首选的CC筛查方法是从医护人员处领取PV试剂盒,在家中进行SS检查,然后将试剂盒送回实验室。这些回答与其他研究不同。对留尼旺部分符合CC筛查条件的人群进行可行性研究,将有助于我们评估基于SS的筛查方式的可行性和普及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[How do women in Réunion Island want to perform HPV test on vaginal sampling as part of cervical cancer screening?]

Background: Since the introduction of HPV testing as a first-line screening method for women aged 30 and over, vaginal sampling (VS) by a healthcare professional or self-sampling (SS) is now possible for women who have not responded to the organized screening program using cervical uterine sampling. The aim of this study was to understand the choices made by a sample of women from La Reunion would like to perform their VS, and the content of the instructions they would like to receive.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study using a single-answer questionnaire. Patients were either interviewed in doctors' office or offered the possibility to answer an online questionnaire. We included women aged 30 to 65 in La Reunion who were concerned by CC screening. We compared the answers of women who were up to date with their screening with those of women who were not.

Results: We included 202 women. The study showed that 64.9% of patients wished to collect the VS kit from a healthcare professional, 80.8% wished to perform SS and 52.5% wished to return it to the laboratory. The preferred language of the instruction was French, with pictures and drawings for 48.5% of patients. There was no significant difference between the answers of women who were up to date with their screening and those who were not.

Conclusion: In a sample of women eligible for CC screening in La Reunion, the preferred methods for CC screening were to collect the PV kit from a healthcare professional, perform the SS at home and then return it to the laboratory. These responses differed from other studies. A feasibility study on a part of La Reunion's eligible population for CC screening would enable us to assess the feasibility and generalizability of a screening modality based on SS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie est un mensuel scientifique d''information et de formation destiné aux gynécologues, aux obstétriciens, aux sénologues et aux biologistes de la reproduction. La revue, dans ses éditoriaux, articles originaux, mises au point, lettres à la rédaction et autres rubriques, donne une information actualisée ayant trait à l''obstétrique et à la gynécologie et aux différentes spécialités développées à partir de ces deux pôles : médecine de la reproduction, médecine maternelle et fœtale, périnatalité, endocrinologie, chirurgie gynécologique, cancérologie pelvienne, sénologie, sexualité, psychosomatique…
期刊最新文献
[Sexuality of the couple during pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology: a comparative study.] [The role of mammography in prevention of cardiovascular risk in women]. [Factors influencing pain during intrauterine device insertion]. [Reception of oocytes from partner (ROPA) in France: context and perspectives]. [Recommendations for clinical practice: Prevention and management of varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection during pregnancy and the perinatal period (extended version)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1