闭合切口负压伤口疗法对减少放疗后乳房再造术后并发症的疗效:倾向得分分析

Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum Pub Date : 2024-09-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojae073
Khaled O Alameddine, Cristina A Salinas, Maria Yan, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, Aparna Vijayasekaran, Nho V Tran, Christin A Harless
{"title":"闭合切口负压伤口疗法对减少放疗后乳房再造术后并发症的疗效:倾向得分分析","authors":"Khaled O Alameddine, Cristina A Salinas, Maria Yan, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, Aparna Vijayasekaran, Nho V Tran, Christin A Harless","doi":"10.1093/asjof/ojae073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implant-based breast reconstruction following radiotherapy can lead to significant postoperative complications. Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has emerged as a potential intervention to reduce these complications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of ciNPWT in reducing postoperative complications in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted, including patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy and radiotherapy between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022. We utilized a procedure-level analysis model with patients contributing distinct observations for multiple procedures. Our primary outcome measures included fluid collection, infection, and wound complications. Propensity score analysis was employed to adjust for potential confounders, such as BMI, smoking history, and diabetes history, creating a balanced comparison between the ciNPWT-treated and untreated groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study of 301 breast reconstructions postradiotherapy from 2015 to 2022, encompassing 218 unique patients, we found significant benefits of ciNPWT. During an average of 2.2-year follow-up, the ciNPWT group demonstrated no infections, contrasting with a 10.4% rate in the non-ciNPWT group (<i>P</i> < .0001). Wound complications were also significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (1.9% vs 11.2%; <i>P</i> = .00848). Demographic differences were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weights. The findings suggest ciNPWT's promising role in enhancing postoperative outcomes in breast reconstruction postradiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that the use of ciNPWT in implant-based breast reconstruction postradiotherapy can potentially reduce postoperative complications. This intervention can improve patient outcomes and may offer cost-saving benefits in the long run.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence 3 therapeutic: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":72118,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","volume":"6 ","pages":"ojae073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Postoperative Complications in Breast Reconstruction After Radiotherapy: A Propensity Score Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Khaled O Alameddine, Cristina A Salinas, Maria Yan, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, Aparna Vijayasekaran, Nho V Tran, Christin A Harless\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asjof/ojae073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implant-based breast reconstruction following radiotherapy can lead to significant postoperative complications. Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has emerged as a potential intervention to reduce these complications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of ciNPWT in reducing postoperative complications in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted, including patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy and radiotherapy between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022. We utilized a procedure-level analysis model with patients contributing distinct observations for multiple procedures. Our primary outcome measures included fluid collection, infection, and wound complications. Propensity score analysis was employed to adjust for potential confounders, such as BMI, smoking history, and diabetes history, creating a balanced comparison between the ciNPWT-treated and untreated groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study of 301 breast reconstructions postradiotherapy from 2015 to 2022, encompassing 218 unique patients, we found significant benefits of ciNPWT. During an average of 2.2-year follow-up, the ciNPWT group demonstrated no infections, contrasting with a 10.4% rate in the non-ciNPWT group (<i>P</i> < .0001). Wound complications were also significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (1.9% vs 11.2%; <i>P</i> = .00848). Demographic differences were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weights. The findings suggest ciNPWT's promising role in enhancing postoperative outcomes in breast reconstruction postradiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that the use of ciNPWT in implant-based breast reconstruction postradiotherapy can potentially reduce postoperative complications. This intervention can improve patient outcomes and may offer cost-saving benefits in the long run.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence 3 therapeutic: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"ojae073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427947/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojae073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojae073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:放疗后以植入物为基础的乳房重建可能导致严重的术后并发症。闭切口负压伤口疗法(ciNPWT)已成为减少这些并发症的潜在干预措施:评估闭切口负压伤口疗法在减少放疗后植入物乳房重建患者术后并发症方面的效果:我们进行了一项回顾性单中心队列研究,研究对象包括在 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间接受乳房切除术和放疗后植入式乳房重建术的患者。我们采用了一个程序级分析模型,患者可对多个程序提供不同的观察结果。我们的主要结果指标包括积液、感染和伤口并发症。我们采用倾向评分分析来调整潜在的混杂因素,如体重指数、吸烟史和糖尿病史,从而在接受 ciNPWT 治疗组和未接受治疗组之间进行平衡比较:从2015年到2022年,我们对301名放疗后乳房再造患者进行了研究,其中包括218名患者,我们发现ciNPWT具有显著疗效。在平均 2.2 年的随访期间,ciNPWT 组未发生感染,而非 ciNPWT 组的感染率为 10.4%(P < .0001)。ciNPWT 组的伤口并发症也明显较低(1.9% 对 11.2%;P = .00848)。人口统计学差异采用治疗权重的逆概率进行调整。研究结果表明,ciNPWT 有助于提高放疗后乳房再造的术后效果:我们的研究表明,在放疗后假体乳房重建中使用 ciNPWT 有可能减少术后并发症。从长远来看,这种干预措施可改善患者的预后,并可节约成本:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Postoperative Complications in Breast Reconstruction After Radiotherapy: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction following radiotherapy can lead to significant postoperative complications. Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has emerged as a potential intervention to reduce these complications.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of ciNPWT in reducing postoperative complications in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.

Methods: A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted, including patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy and radiotherapy between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022. We utilized a procedure-level analysis model with patients contributing distinct observations for multiple procedures. Our primary outcome measures included fluid collection, infection, and wound complications. Propensity score analysis was employed to adjust for potential confounders, such as BMI, smoking history, and diabetes history, creating a balanced comparison between the ciNPWT-treated and untreated groups.

Results: In our study of 301 breast reconstructions postradiotherapy from 2015 to 2022, encompassing 218 unique patients, we found significant benefits of ciNPWT. During an average of 2.2-year follow-up, the ciNPWT group demonstrated no infections, contrasting with a 10.4% rate in the non-ciNPWT group (P < .0001). Wound complications were also significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (1.9% vs 11.2%; P = .00848). Demographic differences were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weights. The findings suggest ciNPWT's promising role in enhancing postoperative outcomes in breast reconstruction postradiotherapy.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that the use of ciNPWT in implant-based breast reconstruction postradiotherapy can potentially reduce postoperative complications. This intervention can improve patient outcomes and may offer cost-saving benefits in the long run.

Level of evidence 3 therapeutic:

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Commentary on: The Role of Nasal Fat Preservation in Upper Lid Surgery and Assessment With the FACE-Q Questionnaire: Innovations in Upper Blepharoplasty. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Autologous vs Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts for Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty. Commentary on: The Gargano Yin Yang Breast Reduction Technique: How to Obtain Better Breast Shape, Volume Distribution, and Size With Long-Lasting Results. Bibliometric Analysis of the Highest Cited Cosmetic Upper Facial Plastic Surgery Articles Over 50 Years. Might Topical Heparin Help With Occlusion Emergencies After Accidental Intra-Arterial Hyaluronic Acid Injections?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1