比较电子烟和传统香烟与心肌梗死、心律失常和心脏性猝死的关系:系统回顾与元分析》。

Biological research for nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1177/10998004241287782
Mohammed I Yacoub, Aziz Aslanoğlu, Fadi Khraim, Anas Alsharawneh, Raghad Abdelkader, Wesam T Almagharbeh, Asim Abdullah Alhejaili, Bassam Dhafer Alshahrani, Dena Eltabey Sobeh, Mudathir M Eltayeb, Rami A Elshatarat, Zyad T Saleh
{"title":"比较电子烟和传统香烟与心肌梗死、心律失常和心脏性猝死的关系:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Mohammed I Yacoub, Aziz Aslanoğlu, Fadi Khraim, Anas Alsharawneh, Raghad Abdelkader, Wesam T Almagharbeh, Asim Abdullah Alhejaili, Bassam Dhafer Alshahrani, Dena Eltabey Sobeh, Mudathir M Eltayeb, Rami A Elshatarat, Zyad T Saleh","doi":"10.1177/10998004241287782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) as a perceived safer alternative to traditional cigarettes has grown rapidly. However, the cardiovascular risks associated with e-cigarettes compared to regular cigarettes remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review and compare the cardiovascular outcomes of e-cigarette use versus traditional cigarette use, focusing on the risks of myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and sudden death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies published in English were included if they reported cardiovascular outcomes related to e-cigarette or traditional cigarette use. A total of 20 studies were included, covering observational and interventional studies focusing on heart rate variability, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac events. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria, and data were extracted and analyzed based on the PICOS (Population, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes, and Study designs) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review found that both e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes pose significant cardiovascular risks, with traditional cigarettes linked to a higher incidence of myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. E-cigarette users also face increased risks of arrhythmias and myocardial infarction compared to non-smokers, primarily due to the constituents of aerosolized e-liquid, including nicotine and flavorings, which contribute to adverse cardiac effects. Regular e-cigarette use, particularly in combination with traditional cigarette use, was associated with a heightened risk of myocardial infarction. Studies also reported heart function abnormalities, such as systolic and diastolic dysfunction, and reduced ejection fractions. Additionally, changes in heart rate variability, heart rate, and blood pressure were observed, indicating both acute and chronic effects of e-cigarettes on cardiovascular autonomic regulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While e-cigarettes may present a lower cardiovascular risk compared to traditional cigarettes, they are not without harm. Both products are linked to increased risks of myocardial infarction and arrhythmias, though traditional cigarettes pose a higher overall threat. Given the limitations in the current evidence base, particularly concerning the long-term effects of e-cigarette use, further research is needed to clarify these cardiovascular risks and inform public health guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":93901,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":" ","pages":"168-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing E-Cigarettes and Traditional Cigarettes in Relation to Myocardial Infarction, Arrhythmias, and Sudden Cardiac Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed I Yacoub, Aziz Aslanoğlu, Fadi Khraim, Anas Alsharawneh, Raghad Abdelkader, Wesam T Almagharbeh, Asim Abdullah Alhejaili, Bassam Dhafer Alshahrani, Dena Eltabey Sobeh, Mudathir M Eltayeb, Rami A Elshatarat, Zyad T Saleh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10998004241287782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) as a perceived safer alternative to traditional cigarettes has grown rapidly. However, the cardiovascular risks associated with e-cigarettes compared to regular cigarettes remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review and compare the cardiovascular outcomes of e-cigarette use versus traditional cigarette use, focusing on the risks of myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and sudden death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies published in English were included if they reported cardiovascular outcomes related to e-cigarette or traditional cigarette use. A total of 20 studies were included, covering observational and interventional studies focusing on heart rate variability, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac events. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria, and data were extracted and analyzed based on the PICOS (Population, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes, and Study designs) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review found that both e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes pose significant cardiovascular risks, with traditional cigarettes linked to a higher incidence of myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. E-cigarette users also face increased risks of arrhythmias and myocardial infarction compared to non-smokers, primarily due to the constituents of aerosolized e-liquid, including nicotine and flavorings, which contribute to adverse cardiac effects. Regular e-cigarette use, particularly in combination with traditional cigarette use, was associated with a heightened risk of myocardial infarction. Studies also reported heart function abnormalities, such as systolic and diastolic dysfunction, and reduced ejection fractions. Additionally, changes in heart rate variability, heart rate, and blood pressure were observed, indicating both acute and chronic effects of e-cigarettes on cardiovascular autonomic regulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While e-cigarettes may present a lower cardiovascular risk compared to traditional cigarettes, they are not without harm. Both products are linked to increased risks of myocardial infarction and arrhythmias, though traditional cigarettes pose a higher overall threat. Given the limitations in the current evidence base, particularly concerning the long-term effects of e-cigarette use, further research is needed to clarify these cardiovascular risks and inform public health guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"168-185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004241287782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004241287782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:电子香烟(e-cigarettes)被认为是比传统香烟更安全的替代品,其使用量增长迅速。然而,与普通香烟相比,电子烟的心血管风险仍不明确:系统回顾和比较使用电子烟与使用传统香烟的心血管后果,重点关注心肌梗死、心律失常和猝死的风险:方法:按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)指南进行了系统综述。如果同行评议的研究报告了与使用电子烟或传统香烟有关的心血管结果,则纳入这些研究。共纳入了 20 项研究,包括观察性和干预性研究,重点关注心率变异性、心肌梗塞、心律失常和突发心脏事件。采用 GRADE 标准评估了证据的质量,并根据 PICOS(人群、干预、比较、结果和研究设计)框架提取和分析了数据:系统综述发现,电子烟和传统香烟都有很大的心血管风险,传统香烟与心肌梗死、心律失常和心脏性猝死的高发率有关。与不吸烟者相比,电子烟使用者也面临着更高的心律失常和心肌梗塞风险,这主要是由于气溶胶电子液体的成分,包括尼古丁和香料,会对心脏产生不良影响。经常使用电子烟,特别是与传统香烟同时使用,与心肌梗死风险增加有关。研究还报告了心脏功能异常,如收缩和舒张功能障碍以及射血分数降低。此外,还观察到心率变异性、心率和血压的变化,这表明电子烟对心血管自主神经调节有急性和慢性影响:尽管与传统香烟相比,电子烟的心血管风险较低,但也并非没有危害。这两种产品都与心肌梗塞和心律失常的风险增加有关,但传统香烟的总体威胁更大。鉴于目前的证据基础存在局限性,特别是关于使用电子烟的长期影响,因此需要进一步研究以澄清这些心血管风险,并为公共卫生指南提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing E-Cigarettes and Traditional Cigarettes in Relation to Myocardial Infarction, Arrhythmias, and Sudden Cardiac Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) as a perceived safer alternative to traditional cigarettes has grown rapidly. However, the cardiovascular risks associated with e-cigarettes compared to regular cigarettes remain unclear.

Objective: To systematically review and compare the cardiovascular outcomes of e-cigarette use versus traditional cigarette use, focusing on the risks of myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and sudden death.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies published in English were included if they reported cardiovascular outcomes related to e-cigarette or traditional cigarette use. A total of 20 studies were included, covering observational and interventional studies focusing on heart rate variability, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac events. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria, and data were extracted and analyzed based on the PICOS (Population, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes, and Study designs) framework.

Results: The systematic review found that both e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes pose significant cardiovascular risks, with traditional cigarettes linked to a higher incidence of myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. E-cigarette users also face increased risks of arrhythmias and myocardial infarction compared to non-smokers, primarily due to the constituents of aerosolized e-liquid, including nicotine and flavorings, which contribute to adverse cardiac effects. Regular e-cigarette use, particularly in combination with traditional cigarette use, was associated with a heightened risk of myocardial infarction. Studies also reported heart function abnormalities, such as systolic and diastolic dysfunction, and reduced ejection fractions. Additionally, changes in heart rate variability, heart rate, and blood pressure were observed, indicating both acute and chronic effects of e-cigarettes on cardiovascular autonomic regulation.

Conclusions: While e-cigarettes may present a lower cardiovascular risk compared to traditional cigarettes, they are not without harm. Both products are linked to increased risks of myocardial infarction and arrhythmias, though traditional cigarettes pose a higher overall threat. Given the limitations in the current evidence base, particularly concerning the long-term effects of e-cigarette use, further research is needed to clarify these cardiovascular risks and inform public health guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Serum Albumin and the Length of Hospital Stay Among Patients With Acute Heart Failure. L-Shaped Associations Between Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index and Hearing Loss: A Cross-Sectional Study From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The Effects of Aquatic Exercise Training on Functional and Hemodynamic Responses in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Melatonin in Human Milk: A Scoping Review. Plant-Based Diets and Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults: An Integrative Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1