Meng-Yao Xu , Na Zeng , Sheng Ma , Zi-Jin Hua , Si-Han Zhang , Ji-Cheng Xiang , Yi-Fan Xiong , Zhi-Yu Xia , Jian-Xuan Sun , Chen-Qian Liu , Jin-Zhou Xu , Ye An , Shao-Gang Wang , Qi Dong Xia
{"title":"机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)的临床评估:系统综述与网络 Meta 分析》。","authors":"Meng-Yao Xu , Na Zeng , Sheng Ma , Zi-Jin Hua , Si-Han Zhang , Ji-Cheng Xiang , Yi-Fan Xiong , Zhi-Yu Xia , Jian-Xuan Sun , Chen-Qian Liu , Jin-Zhou Xu , Ye An , Shao-Gang Wang , Qi Dong Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignant tumor affecting the male reproductive system and there are mainly three widely accepted PCa surgery types in current clinical treatment: open radical prostatectomy (ORP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Here, we aimed to evaluate the clinical effect of RARP for PCa patients compared with ORP and LRP based on the context of PCa encompass two dimensions: oncological outcomes (biochemical recurrence (BCR) and positive surgical margin (PSM)) and functional outcomes (urinary continence and recovery of erectile function) in this network meta-analysis (NMA). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched in January 7, 2024. 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 72 non-RCTs were included. RARP displayed significant positive effect on lower BCR and better recovery of erectile function but no significant differences existed among three surgery types for PSM and urinary continence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 104514"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A clinical evaluation of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in located prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Meng-Yao Xu , Na Zeng , Sheng Ma , Zi-Jin Hua , Si-Han Zhang , Ji-Cheng Xiang , Yi-Fan Xiong , Zhi-Yu Xia , Jian-Xuan Sun , Chen-Qian Liu , Jin-Zhou Xu , Ye An , Shao-Gang Wang , Qi Dong Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignant tumor affecting the male reproductive system and there are mainly three widely accepted PCa surgery types in current clinical treatment: open radical prostatectomy (ORP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Here, we aimed to evaluate the clinical effect of RARP for PCa patients compared with ORP and LRP based on the context of PCa encompass two dimensions: oncological outcomes (biochemical recurrence (BCR) and positive surgical margin (PSM)) and functional outcomes (urinary continence and recovery of erectile function) in this network meta-analysis (NMA). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched in January 7, 2024. 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 72 non-RCTs were included. RARP displayed significant positive effect on lower BCR and better recovery of erectile function but no significant differences existed among three surgery types for PSM and urinary continence.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"volume\":\"204 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824002579\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842824002579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A clinical evaluation of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in located prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignant tumor affecting the male reproductive system and there are mainly three widely accepted PCa surgery types in current clinical treatment: open radical prostatectomy (ORP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Here, we aimed to evaluate the clinical effect of RARP for PCa patients compared with ORP and LRP based on the context of PCa encompass two dimensions: oncological outcomes (biochemical recurrence (BCR) and positive surgical margin (PSM)) and functional outcomes (urinary continence and recovery of erectile function) in this network meta-analysis (NMA). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched in January 7, 2024. 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 72 non-RCTs were included. RARP displayed significant positive effect on lower BCR and better recovery of erectile function but no significant differences existed among three surgery types for PSM and urinary continence.
期刊介绍:
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.