{"title":"多模态成像评估风湿性二尖瓣狭窄的严重程度。","authors":"Nidhal Bouchahda, Mezri Maatouk, Ghada Sassi, Marwa Jarraya, Mohamed Yessine Kallela, Houssemeddine Hamrouni, Mouna Bader, Hatem Hamrouni, Aymen Najjar, Ahmed Zrig, Mejdi Ben Messaoud","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03251-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multi-modality imaging is the recommended approach to assess the severity of valvular heart diseases. Rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS), however, has yet to benefit from this approach. The aim of this study is to assess the added value of cardiac MRI (CMR) and computed tomography (CT) calcium score in assessing severity of MS when compared to 3D echocardiography. Patients with MS in sinus rhythm were included. Both CMR and 3D echo assessments of the mitral valve were performed. Subsequently, three radiologists and three cardiologists independently measured mitral valve area (MVA). In addition, CT of the mitral valve was conducted. Mitral calcium score was calculated according the Agatston method. A total of 41 patients were included. CMR significantly overestimated MVA when compared to 3D echo MVA regardless of the investigator [F (1, 40) = 23.3, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.36]. The more severe the MS, the greater the overestimation by CMR compared to 3D echo. Regarding CT of the mitral valve, 25 (61%) patients had an undetectable calcium. There was no significant difference in CT calcium scores between severe and non-severe MS (74 ± 282 HU vs. 65 ± 210 HU, p = 0.9). MVA measurement by CMR is overestimated when compared to 3D echo. Additionally, mitral valve calcium score is not correlated to MS severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"2429-2433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-modality imaging to assess rheumatic mitral stenosis severity.\",\"authors\":\"Nidhal Bouchahda, Mezri Maatouk, Ghada Sassi, Marwa Jarraya, Mohamed Yessine Kallela, Houssemeddine Hamrouni, Mouna Bader, Hatem Hamrouni, Aymen Najjar, Ahmed Zrig, Mejdi Ben Messaoud\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-024-03251-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multi-modality imaging is the recommended approach to assess the severity of valvular heart diseases. Rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS), however, has yet to benefit from this approach. The aim of this study is to assess the added value of cardiac MRI (CMR) and computed tomography (CT) calcium score in assessing severity of MS when compared to 3D echocardiography. Patients with MS in sinus rhythm were included. Both CMR and 3D echo assessments of the mitral valve were performed. Subsequently, three radiologists and three cardiologists independently measured mitral valve area (MVA). In addition, CT of the mitral valve was conducted. Mitral calcium score was calculated according the Agatston method. A total of 41 patients were included. CMR significantly overestimated MVA when compared to 3D echo MVA regardless of the investigator [F (1, 40) = 23.3, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.36]. The more severe the MS, the greater the overestimation by CMR compared to 3D echo. Regarding CT of the mitral valve, 25 (61%) patients had an undetectable calcium. There was no significant difference in CT calcium scores between severe and non-severe MS (74 ± 282 HU vs. 65 ± 210 HU, p = 0.9). MVA measurement by CMR is overestimated when compared to 3D echo. Additionally, mitral valve calcium score is not correlated to MS severity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2429-2433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03251-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03251-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
多模态成像是评估瓣膜性心脏病严重程度的推荐方法。然而,风湿性二尖瓣狭窄(MS)尚未从这种方法中受益。本研究旨在评估心脏核磁共振成像(CMR)和计算机断层扫描(CT)钙化评分与三维超声心动图相比在评估 MS 严重程度方面的附加价值。研究对象包括窦性心律的 MS 患者。对二尖瓣进行了CMR和三维回声评估。随后,三位放射科医师和三位心脏病医师分别独立测量了二尖瓣面积(MVA)。此外,还对二尖瓣进行了 CT 检查。根据 Agatston 方法计算二尖瓣钙化评分。共纳入 41 名患者。与三维回波 MVA 相比,无论研究者是谁,CMR 都明显高估了 MVA [F (1, 40) = 23.3, p
Multi-modality imaging to assess rheumatic mitral stenosis severity.
Multi-modality imaging is the recommended approach to assess the severity of valvular heart diseases. Rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS), however, has yet to benefit from this approach. The aim of this study is to assess the added value of cardiac MRI (CMR) and computed tomography (CT) calcium score in assessing severity of MS when compared to 3D echocardiography. Patients with MS in sinus rhythm were included. Both CMR and 3D echo assessments of the mitral valve were performed. Subsequently, three radiologists and three cardiologists independently measured mitral valve area (MVA). In addition, CT of the mitral valve was conducted. Mitral calcium score was calculated according the Agatston method. A total of 41 patients were included. CMR significantly overestimated MVA when compared to 3D echo MVA regardless of the investigator [F (1, 40) = 23.3, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.36]. The more severe the MS, the greater the overestimation by CMR compared to 3D echo. Regarding CT of the mitral valve, 25 (61%) patients had an undetectable calcium. There was no significant difference in CT calcium scores between severe and non-severe MS (74 ± 282 HU vs. 65 ± 210 HU, p = 0.9). MVA measurement by CMR is overestimated when compared to 3D echo. Additionally, mitral valve calcium score is not correlated to MS severity.