{"title":"CBCT 评估 ProTaper Next 和 WaveOne 锉系统对残余牙本质厚度的影响。","authors":"Vathsala Nijalingappa, Umreena Zahoor Banday, Prabu Mahin Syed Ismail, Abinash Mohapatra, Gaurangi Lavania, Prajakta Ganesh Chougule","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_141_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obturation of the canal space, efficient disinfection, and thorough canal debridement are essential components of endodontic therapy success. A crucial first step is biomechanical preparation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study set out to assess various file systems' cleaning efficacy in terms of the thickness of dentin that remained after cleaning.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>Twenty permanently removed anterior teeth were used in the investigation, and they were split into two groups: Group B used reciprocating WaveOne file systems, and Group A used ProTaper Next (PTN). After obtaining a pre-CBCT scan, the corresponding file groups proceeded with biomechanical preparation. A post-CBCT scan was obtained, and the dentin thickness remaining was compared between the pre- and post-CBCT scans. Statistics were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Dentin thickness decrease was shown to be minimal for ProTaper Next (PTN) and maximal for WaveOne; nonetheless, the intergroup comparison was deemed to be highly inconsequential.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After biomechanical preparation, WaveOne is a highly recommended rotary endodontic device that does not significantly reduce the residual dentin thickness.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 3","pages":"S2202-S2204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CBCT Assessment of Effectiveness of ProTaper Next and WaveOne file Systems on Remaining Dentin Thickness.\",\"authors\":\"Vathsala Nijalingappa, Umreena Zahoor Banday, Prabu Mahin Syed Ismail, Abinash Mohapatra, Gaurangi Lavania, Prajakta Ganesh Chougule\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_141_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obturation of the canal space, efficient disinfection, and thorough canal debridement are essential components of endodontic therapy success. A crucial first step is biomechanical preparation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study set out to assess various file systems' cleaning efficacy in terms of the thickness of dentin that remained after cleaning.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>Twenty permanently removed anterior teeth were used in the investigation, and they were split into two groups: Group B used reciprocating WaveOne file systems, and Group A used ProTaper Next (PTN). After obtaining a pre-CBCT scan, the corresponding file groups proceeded with biomechanical preparation. A post-CBCT scan was obtained, and the dentin thickness remaining was compared between the pre- and post-CBCT scans. Statistics were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Dentin thickness decrease was shown to be minimal for ProTaper Next (PTN) and maximal for WaveOne; nonetheless, the intergroup comparison was deemed to be highly inconsequential.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After biomechanical preparation, WaveOne is a highly recommended rotary endodontic device that does not significantly reduce the residual dentin thickness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 Suppl 3\",\"pages\":\"S2202-S2204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426678/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_141_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_141_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:管腔封堵、高效消毒和彻底清管是牙髓治疗成功的重要组成部分。生物力学准备是至关重要的第一步:本研究旨在根据清洁后残留的牙本质厚度评估各种锉系统的清洁效果:调查使用了 20 颗永久性拔除的前牙,并将其分为两组:B 组使用往复式 WaveOne 锉系统,A 组使用 ProTaper Next (PTN)。在获得预CBCT扫描后,相应的锉组开始进行生物力学准备。获得CBCT后扫描结果后,比较CBCT前扫描结果和CBCT后扫描结果中剩余的牙本质厚度。使用统计学方法分析数据:结果表明,ProTaper Next (PTN) 的牙本质厚度减少得最少,而 WaveOne 的牙本质厚度减少得最多;不过,组间比较被认为是非常不重要的:结论:经过生物力学准备后,WaveOne 是一种非常值得推荐的旋转根管治疗器,它不会显著减少残余牙本质厚度。
CBCT Assessment of Effectiveness of ProTaper Next and WaveOne file Systems on Remaining Dentin Thickness.
Introduction: Obturation of the canal space, efficient disinfection, and thorough canal debridement are essential components of endodontic therapy success. A crucial first step is biomechanical preparation.
Objectives: This study set out to assess various file systems' cleaning efficacy in terms of the thickness of dentin that remained after cleaning.
Materials and method: Twenty permanently removed anterior teeth were used in the investigation, and they were split into two groups: Group B used reciprocating WaveOne file systems, and Group A used ProTaper Next (PTN). After obtaining a pre-CBCT scan, the corresponding file groups proceeded with biomechanical preparation. A post-CBCT scan was obtained, and the dentin thickness remaining was compared between the pre- and post-CBCT scans. Statistics were used to analyze the data.
Result: Dentin thickness decrease was shown to be minimal for ProTaper Next (PTN) and maximal for WaveOne; nonetheless, the intergroup comparison was deemed to be highly inconsequential.
Conclusion: After biomechanical preparation, WaveOne is a highly recommended rotary endodontic device that does not significantly reduce the residual dentin thickness.