单次根管治疗与多次根管治疗术后止痛和愈合效果的比较分析:一项三级医疗研究

IF 0.9 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-07 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_281_24
Miriyala Chaitanya, Abhilasha Bhawalkar, Anandamoy Bagchi, Divyatammana, Anshuman Shetty, Hitesh Chohan, Mohammed Mustafa
{"title":"单次根管治疗与多次根管治疗术后止痛和愈合效果的比较分析:一项三级医疗研究","authors":"Miriyala Chaitanya, Abhilasha Bhawalkar, Anandamoy Bagchi, Divyatammana, Anshuman Shetty, Hitesh Chohan, Mohammed Mustafa","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_281_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Apical periodontitis and irreversible pulpitis are typical dental conditions treated with \"<i>Root Canal Treatment</i> (RCT)\". Single-visit RCT has become a viable alternative to the multi-visit RCT method used in traditional RCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 RCT participants were randomised to either the single-visit or multiple-visit groups at random. A \"<i>Visual Analogue Scale</i> (VAS)\" was used to measure post-operative discomfort at 24, 48, and 72 hours. At 6 and 12 months, peri-apical radiographs were used to assess the healing results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At all time periods, there were no discernible variations in post-operative discomfort between the single-visit and multiple-visit groups. In contrast to the multiple-visit group, the single-visit group had greater rates of full healing at both 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to multiple-visit RCT, single-visit RCT provides similar post-operative pain alleviation and may result in better healing results. This suggests that single-visit RCT is a feasible and effective management option for patients who need root canal therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 3","pages":"S2388-S2390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Post-operative Pain Relief and Healing Outcomes between Single-Visit and Multiple-Visit Root Canal Therapy: A Tertiary Care Study.\",\"authors\":\"Miriyala Chaitanya, Abhilasha Bhawalkar, Anandamoy Bagchi, Divyatammana, Anshuman Shetty, Hitesh Chohan, Mohammed Mustafa\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_281_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Apical periodontitis and irreversible pulpitis are typical dental conditions treated with \\\"<i>Root Canal Treatment</i> (RCT)\\\". Single-visit RCT has become a viable alternative to the multi-visit RCT method used in traditional RCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 RCT participants were randomised to either the single-visit or multiple-visit groups at random. A \\\"<i>Visual Analogue Scale</i> (VAS)\\\" was used to measure post-operative discomfort at 24, 48, and 72 hours. At 6 and 12 months, peri-apical radiographs were used to assess the healing results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At all time periods, there were no discernible variations in post-operative discomfort between the single-visit and multiple-visit groups. In contrast to the multiple-visit group, the single-visit group had greater rates of full healing at both 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to multiple-visit RCT, single-visit RCT provides similar post-operative pain alleviation and may result in better healing results. This suggests that single-visit RCT is a feasible and effective management option for patients who need root canal therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 Suppl 3\",\"pages\":\"S2388-S2390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426698/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_281_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_281_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根尖牙周炎和不可逆牙髓炎是 "根管治疗(RCT)"的典型牙科疾病。单次就诊 RCT 已成为传统 RCT 多次就诊 RCT 方法的可行替代方案:方法:共 100 名 RCT 参与者被随机分配到单次就诊组或多次就诊组。采用 "视觉模拟量表(VAS)"测量术后 24、48 和 72 小时的不适感。6个月和12个月时,使用根尖周X光片评估愈合效果:结果:在所有时间段内,单次就诊组和多次就诊组的术后不适感均无明显差异。与多次就诊组相比,单次就诊组在 6 个月和 12 个月时的完全愈合率更高:结论:与多次就诊的 RCT 相比,单次就诊的 RCT 在缓解术后疼痛方面效果相似,而且可能会带来更好的愈合效果。这表明,对于需要根管治疗的患者来说,单次就诊 RCT 是一种可行且有效的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Post-operative Pain Relief and Healing Outcomes between Single-Visit and Multiple-Visit Root Canal Therapy: A Tertiary Care Study.

Background: Apical periodontitis and irreversible pulpitis are typical dental conditions treated with "Root Canal Treatment (RCT)". Single-visit RCT has become a viable alternative to the multi-visit RCT method used in traditional RCT.

Methods: A total of 100 RCT participants were randomised to either the single-visit or multiple-visit groups at random. A "Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)" was used to measure post-operative discomfort at 24, 48, and 72 hours. At 6 and 12 months, peri-apical radiographs were used to assess the healing results.

Results: At all time periods, there were no discernible variations in post-operative discomfort between the single-visit and multiple-visit groups. In contrast to the multiple-visit group, the single-visit group had greater rates of full healing at both 6 and 12 months.

Conclusion: Compared to multiple-visit RCT, single-visit RCT provides similar post-operative pain alleviation and may result in better healing results. This suggests that single-visit RCT is a feasible and effective management option for patients who need root canal therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Arthrocentesis versus Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in TMJ Disorders: A Clinical Study. Fentanyl and Propofol Versus Fentanyl and Etomidate for the Insertion Conditions of Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Prospective Observational Study. Orphan Drugs and Diseases: A Systematic Review. Evaluation of Efficacy of Bupivacaine vs Articaine for Postoperative Pain Management in Open Reduction of Fracture of Mandible- an in vivo study. ENHANCED: Assessment of Effects of Reducing Opioid Use Through Multimodal Anesthesia in Recovery Protocols: A Clinical Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1