评估可用性和无障碍性:无障碍旅游数字解决方案 access@tour by action 的案例。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2409810
Pedro Teixeira, Leonor Teixeira, Celeste Eusébio
{"title":"评估可用性和无障碍性:无障碍旅游数字解决方案 access@tour by action 的案例。","authors":"Pedro Teixeira, Leonor Teixeira, Celeste Eusébio","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2409810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Information systems can help improve accessible tourism conditions. During the development of accessible technology, a crucial phase is testing. Notwithstanding, usability testing methodologies often dismiss accessibility. To overcome this gap, this work contributes with an innovative mixed-method testing methodology that integrates accessibility and usability components in technology evaluation. The capabilities of this methodological process are demonstrated through testing the prototype of a mobile solution for accessible tourism - <i>access@tour by action</i>.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Nine experts evaluated the platform and helped correct accessibility failures. Afterward, 78 end-users tested the prototype. The procedure includes a set of tasks to be performed in the prototype and a final questionnaire. This questionnaire was specifically created for accessibility markets and is itself a significant contribution.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Testing with experts helped improve the prototype's accessibility before it reached end-users. The results with end-users are provided in two distinct ways. First, the task performance measures are presented, which showed overall good completion rates. Second, the results obtained from the questionnaires are disclosed. Overall, the platform was considered relevant, accessible, and easy to use. Still, some minor flaws were identified regarding interface connectivity, symbology, and reading sequence. Thus, improvements are suggested based on obtained feedback.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The testing procedure was essential to gather input from a user point of view, ensuring the final version of the <i>access@tour by action</i> is accessible and, therefore, \"usable\". This allowed for validating the methodological method, significantly contributing to future research on evaluating technology accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating both usability and accessibility: the case of access@tour by action - a digital solution for accessible tourism.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Teixeira, Leonor Teixeira, Celeste Eusébio\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2024.2409810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Information systems can help improve accessible tourism conditions. During the development of accessible technology, a crucial phase is testing. Notwithstanding, usability testing methodologies often dismiss accessibility. To overcome this gap, this work contributes with an innovative mixed-method testing methodology that integrates accessibility and usability components in technology evaluation. The capabilities of this methodological process are demonstrated through testing the prototype of a mobile solution for accessible tourism - <i>access@tour by action</i>.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Nine experts evaluated the platform and helped correct accessibility failures. Afterward, 78 end-users tested the prototype. The procedure includes a set of tasks to be performed in the prototype and a final questionnaire. This questionnaire was specifically created for accessibility markets and is itself a significant contribution.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Testing with experts helped improve the prototype's accessibility before it reached end-users. The results with end-users are provided in two distinct ways. First, the task performance measures are presented, which showed overall good completion rates. Second, the results obtained from the questionnaires are disclosed. Overall, the platform was considered relevant, accessible, and easy to use. Still, some minor flaws were identified regarding interface connectivity, symbology, and reading sequence. Thus, improvements are suggested based on obtained feedback.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The testing procedure was essential to gather input from a user point of view, ensuring the final version of the <i>access@tour by action</i> is accessible and, therefore, \\\"usable\\\". This allowed for validating the methodological method, significantly contributing to future research on evaluating technology accessibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2409810\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2409810","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:信息系统有助于改善无障碍旅游条件。在开发无障碍技术的过程中,测试是一个关键阶段。尽管如此,可用性测试方法往往忽略了无障碍性。为了克服这一缺陷,本研究采用了一种创新的混合测试方法,将无障碍和可用性整合到技术评估中。通过测试无障碍旅游移动解决方案的原型--access@tour by action.Methods,展示了这一方法过程的能力:方法:九位专家对平台进行了评估,并帮助纠正了无障碍问题。随后,78 名最终用户对原型进行了测试。测试程序包括在原型中执行的一系列任务和最终问卷。这份问卷是专门为无障碍市场设计的,其本身就是一项重大贡献:结果:在原型到达最终用户之前,与专家一起进行的测试有助于提高原型的无障碍程度。最终用户的测试结果以两种不同的方式提供。首先,对任务执行情况进行了衡量,结果显示总体完成率较高。其次,披露了问卷调查的结果。总体而言,该平台被认为是相关的、可访问的和易于使用的。不过,在界面连接性、符号学和阅读顺序方面还是发现了一些小缺陷。因此,我们根据获得的反馈意见提出了改进建议:测试程序对于从用户角度收集意见至关重要,可确保 access@tour by action 的最终版本易于访问,因此 "可用"。这有助于验证方法的有效性,对未来评估技术无障碍性的研究大有裨益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating both usability and accessibility: the case of access@tour by action - a digital solution for accessible tourism.

Aim: Information systems can help improve accessible tourism conditions. During the development of accessible technology, a crucial phase is testing. Notwithstanding, usability testing methodologies often dismiss accessibility. To overcome this gap, this work contributes with an innovative mixed-method testing methodology that integrates accessibility and usability components in technology evaluation. The capabilities of this methodological process are demonstrated through testing the prototype of a mobile solution for accessible tourism - access@tour by action.

Methods: Nine experts evaluated the platform and helped correct accessibility failures. Afterward, 78 end-users tested the prototype. The procedure includes a set of tasks to be performed in the prototype and a final questionnaire. This questionnaire was specifically created for accessibility markets and is itself a significant contribution.

Results: Testing with experts helped improve the prototype's accessibility before it reached end-users. The results with end-users are provided in two distinct ways. First, the task performance measures are presented, which showed overall good completion rates. Second, the results obtained from the questionnaires are disclosed. Overall, the platform was considered relevant, accessible, and easy to use. Still, some minor flaws were identified regarding interface connectivity, symbology, and reading sequence. Thus, improvements are suggested based on obtained feedback.

Conclusion: The testing procedure was essential to gather input from a user point of view, ensuring the final version of the access@tour by action is accessible and, therefore, "usable". This allowed for validating the methodological method, significantly contributing to future research on evaluating technology accessibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1