新西兰重大创伤目的地政策的遵守情况:对当前做法的审计。

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.26635/6965.6594
Georgia Gibson, Bridget Dicker, Ian Civil, Bridget Kool
{"title":"新西兰重大创伤目的地政策的遵守情况:对当前做法的审计。","authors":"Georgia Gibson, Bridget Dicker, Ian Civil, Bridget Kool","doi":"10.26635/6965.6594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate adherence to the New Zealand Major Trauma Destination Policy (MTDP). This audit assessed if, based on their injuries, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) attended major trauma cases were taken to the MTDP determined appropriate hospital. Findings will guide and further improve pre-hospital trauma care and associated patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective evaluation of adherence to the New Zealand MTDP for a random sample of 100 cases (ISS >12) injured between 31 November 2017-30 November 2018 who survived to hospital. The EMS electronic patient record (ePRF) was reviewed for each case. Adherence was indicated by the transport of injured patients from the scene to the appropriate initial destination based on meeting the respective regional MTDPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, there was a 94% adherence rate to the MTDP. For patients that were not classified as requiring transport to an advanced-level trauma centre, there was a 98.9% (n=86/87) adherence compared to 61.5% (n=8/13) adherence in those that did require transport to an advanced-level trauma centre.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was high adherence to the MTDP, with 94% of cases being taken to the appropriate destination directly from the incident scene. There is scope for improvement in cases whereby the nearest hospital should be bypassed in favour of a more distant advanced-level trauma centre.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"137 1603","pages":"89-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to New Zealand's Major Trauma Destination Policy: an audit of current practice.\",\"authors\":\"Georgia Gibson, Bridget Dicker, Ian Civil, Bridget Kool\",\"doi\":\"10.26635/6965.6594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate adherence to the New Zealand Major Trauma Destination Policy (MTDP). This audit assessed if, based on their injuries, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) attended major trauma cases were taken to the MTDP determined appropriate hospital. Findings will guide and further improve pre-hospital trauma care and associated patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective evaluation of adherence to the New Zealand MTDP for a random sample of 100 cases (ISS >12) injured between 31 November 2017-30 November 2018 who survived to hospital. The EMS electronic patient record (ePRF) was reviewed for each case. Adherence was indicated by the transport of injured patients from the scene to the appropriate initial destination based on meeting the respective regional MTDPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, there was a 94% adherence rate to the MTDP. For patients that were not classified as requiring transport to an advanced-level trauma centre, there was a 98.9% (n=86/87) adherence compared to 61.5% (n=8/13) adherence in those that did require transport to an advanced-level trauma centre.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was high adherence to the MTDP, with 94% of cases being taken to the appropriate destination directly from the incident scene. There is scope for improvement in cases whereby the nearest hospital should be bypassed in favour of a more distant advanced-level trauma centre.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"137 1603\",\"pages\":\"89-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估新西兰重大创伤目的地政策(MTDP)的遵守情况。此次审核评估了紧急医疗服务(EMS)是否根据伤情将重大创伤病例送往 MTDP 确定的合适医院。审计结果将指导并进一步改善院前创伤救治和相关患者的治疗效果:方法:对2017年11月31日至2018年11月30日期间受伤并在医院存活的100例(ISS>12)随机抽样进行新西兰MTDP遵守情况的回顾性评估。对每个病例的 EMS 电子病历(ePRF)进行了审查。根据符合各地区 MTDP 的情况,将受伤患者从现场运送到适当的初始目的地,即为遵守情况:结果:总体而言,符合 MTDP 的比例为 94%。对于未被归类为需要送往高级创伤中心的患者,98.9%(n=86/87)的患者遵守了MTDP,而对于需要送往高级创伤中心的患者,遵守率为61.5%(n=8/13):对 MTDP 的遵守率很高,94% 的病例从事故现场直接送往适当的目的地。在绕过最近的医院而前往更远的高级创伤中心的情况下,仍有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adherence to New Zealand's Major Trauma Destination Policy: an audit of current practice.

Aim: To evaluate adherence to the New Zealand Major Trauma Destination Policy (MTDP). This audit assessed if, based on their injuries, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) attended major trauma cases were taken to the MTDP determined appropriate hospital. Findings will guide and further improve pre-hospital trauma care and associated patient outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective evaluation of adherence to the New Zealand MTDP for a random sample of 100 cases (ISS >12) injured between 31 November 2017-30 November 2018 who survived to hospital. The EMS electronic patient record (ePRF) was reviewed for each case. Adherence was indicated by the transport of injured patients from the scene to the appropriate initial destination based on meeting the respective regional MTDPs.

Results: Overall, there was a 94% adherence rate to the MTDP. For patients that were not classified as requiring transport to an advanced-level trauma centre, there was a 98.9% (n=86/87) adherence compared to 61.5% (n=8/13) adherence in those that did require transport to an advanced-level trauma centre.

Conclusion: There was high adherence to the MTDP, with 94% of cases being taken to the appropriate destination directly from the incident scene. There is scope for improvement in cases whereby the nearest hospital should be bypassed in favour of a more distant advanced-level trauma centre.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
期刊最新文献
Projected increases in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2020-2044. Delayed presentation of severe cervical myelopathy two years post-motorcycle accident: a case report. Does suicide in New Zealand follow a semi-lunar rhythm? How is the specialist-primary palliative care model functioning for cancer patients in the current New Zealand health system? Predatory journals: what can we do to protect their prey?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1