Renning Zheng, James P Daniels, Daniel M Moreira, Shakiba Eslamimehr, Alexis R Freedland, Lourdes Guerrios-Rivera, Jay H Fowke, Stephen J Freedland
{"title":"胰岛素抵抗能否预测前列腺癌?通过度他雄胺降低前列腺癌发病率(REDUCE)试验的结果。","authors":"Renning Zheng, James P Daniels, Daniel M Moreira, Shakiba Eslamimehr, Alexis R Freedland, Lourdes Guerrios-Rivera, Jay H Fowke, Stephen J Freedland","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prior studies testing the association between insulin resistance (IR) and prostate cancer (PC) risk are inconsistent. We examined the association between Homeostatic Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR; calculated from fasting baseline insulin and glucose) and PC in REDUCE, a 4-year randomized trial of dutasteride vs. placebo for PC prevention.</p><p><strong>Experimental design: </strong>All patients had prestudy negative biopsies and underwent study mandated biopsies at 2 and 4 years regardless of prostate-specific antigen. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between log-transformed or categorized HOMA-IR scores and PC risk. Multinominal regression was used to assess associations between HOMA-IR scores and tumor grade (low grade [grade group 1]; high-grade [grade groups 2-5]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5430 REDUCE participants (1212 with PC; 856 low- and 356 high-grade), higher HOMA-IR was associated with lower PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; p = .03; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .04). When stratified by grade, HOMA-IR was significantly associated with reduced low-grade PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.84; 95% CI , 0.74-0.94; p = .003; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .002) but was unrelated to high-grade PC (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.21; p = .81; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .26). Results were similar in placebo and treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, higher HOMA-IR was associated with a reduced risk of low-grade PC but was not associated with high-grade disease. The mechanisms to explain these findings are unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does insulin resistance predict prostate cancer? Results from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer (REDUCE) Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Renning Zheng, James P Daniels, Daniel M Moreira, Shakiba Eslamimehr, Alexis R Freedland, Lourdes Guerrios-Rivera, Jay H Fowke, Stephen J Freedland\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cncr.35568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prior studies testing the association between insulin resistance (IR) and prostate cancer (PC) risk are inconsistent. We examined the association between Homeostatic Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR; calculated from fasting baseline insulin and glucose) and PC in REDUCE, a 4-year randomized trial of dutasteride vs. placebo for PC prevention.</p><p><strong>Experimental design: </strong>All patients had prestudy negative biopsies and underwent study mandated biopsies at 2 and 4 years regardless of prostate-specific antigen. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between log-transformed or categorized HOMA-IR scores and PC risk. Multinominal regression was used to assess associations between HOMA-IR scores and tumor grade (low grade [grade group 1]; high-grade [grade groups 2-5]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5430 REDUCE participants (1212 with PC; 856 low- and 356 high-grade), higher HOMA-IR was associated with lower PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; p = .03; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .04). When stratified by grade, HOMA-IR was significantly associated with reduced low-grade PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.84; 95% CI , 0.74-0.94; p = .003; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .002) but was unrelated to high-grade PC (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.21; p = .81; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .26). Results were similar in placebo and treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, higher HOMA-IR was associated with a reduced risk of low-grade PC but was not associated with high-grade disease. The mechanisms to explain these findings are unclear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35568\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:之前测试胰岛素抵抗(IR)与前列腺癌(PC)风险之间关系的研究结果并不一致。我们研究了胰岛素抵抗静态评估(HOMA-IR,根据空腹基线胰岛素和葡萄糖计算)与 REDUCE 中 PC 之间的关系,REDUCE 是一项为期 4 年的预防 PC 的度他雄胺与安慰剂的随机试验:实验设计:所有患者的研究前活检结果均为阴性,且无论前列腺特异性抗原情况如何,均在 2 年和 4 年时接受研究要求的活检。多变量逻辑回归模型用于研究对数变换或分类 HOMA-IR 评分与 PC 风险之间的关系。多项式回归用于评估HOMA-IR评分与肿瘤分级(低级别[1级组];高级别[2-5级组])之间的关系:在5430名REDUCE参与者中(1212名PC患者;856名低度患者和356名高级别患者),较高的HOMA-IR与较低的PC风险相关(log-HOMA-IR:OR,0.89;95% CI,0.80-0.99;p = .03;分类HOMA-IR:p趋势 = .04)。按级别分层时,HOMA-IR 与低级别 PC 风险降低显著相关(log-HOMA-IR:OR,0.84;95% CI ,0.74-0.94;p = .003;分类 HOMA-IR:p 趋势 = .002),但与高级别 PC 无关(log-HOMA-IR:OR,1.02;95% CI,0.86-1.21;p = .81;分类 HOMA-IR:p 趋势 = .26)。安慰剂组和治疗组的结果相似:总之,较高的 HOMA-IR 与低级别 PC 风险降低有关,但与高级别疾病无关。解释这些发现的机制尚不清楚。
Does insulin resistance predict prostate cancer? Results from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer (REDUCE) Trial.
Purpose: Prior studies testing the association between insulin resistance (IR) and prostate cancer (PC) risk are inconsistent. We examined the association between Homeostatic Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR; calculated from fasting baseline insulin and glucose) and PC in REDUCE, a 4-year randomized trial of dutasteride vs. placebo for PC prevention.
Experimental design: All patients had prestudy negative biopsies and underwent study mandated biopsies at 2 and 4 years regardless of prostate-specific antigen. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between log-transformed or categorized HOMA-IR scores and PC risk. Multinominal regression was used to assess associations between HOMA-IR scores and tumor grade (low grade [grade group 1]; high-grade [grade groups 2-5]).
Results: Among 5430 REDUCE participants (1212 with PC; 856 low- and 356 high-grade), higher HOMA-IR was associated with lower PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; p = .03; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .04). When stratified by grade, HOMA-IR was significantly associated with reduced low-grade PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.84; 95% CI , 0.74-0.94; p = .003; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .002) but was unrelated to high-grade PC (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.21; p = .81; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .26). Results were similar in placebo and treatment arms.
Conclusions: In summary, higher HOMA-IR was associated with a reduced risk of low-grade PC but was not associated with high-grade disease. The mechanisms to explain these findings are unclear.
期刊介绍:
The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society.
CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research