长期氮肥施用对一氧化二氮排放的遗留影响。

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176532
Xue Tian, Huanhuan Wei, Yibai Zhao, Rui Cao, Chong Zhang, Xiaotong Song, Di Wu, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, Robert M Rees, Pete Smith, Xiaotang Ju
{"title":"长期氮肥施用对一氧化二氮排放的遗留影响。","authors":"Xue Tian, Huanhuan Wei, Yibai Zhao, Rui Cao, Chong Zhang, Xiaotong Song, Di Wu, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, Robert M Rees, Pete Smith, Xiaotang Ju","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary driver of increasing atmospheric concentrations of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is the use of organic and synthetic fertilizer to increase agricultural crop production. Current global estimates are based on IPCC N<sub>2</sub>O emission factor (EF) calculations, although there are shortcomings as many of the N<sub>2</sub>O EFs are derived from measurements during the cropping season. These neglect the fallow season, and do not adequately account for double or even triple cropping systems or legacy effects on soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in the following year. In this study, we assessed the legacy effect of fertilization on soil N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes using data from a long-term double-cropping field experiment with summer maize and winter wheat in rotation, in which no nitrogen (N; NN) and balanced manure with synthetic N (MN) fertilized treatments were switched to allow an assessment of legacy effects. Based on high-frequency measurements of N<sub>2</sub>O and previous data, we calculated that the historical N fertilization, or legacy effect, explained 23 % of the annual flux of 0.81 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> in the first season of observation. In the following three seasons, the legacy effect of the previous N fertilization regime decreased to a negligible level, with N<sub>2</sub>O emissions mainly driven by in-season fertilization. Our data show that, on average, the seasonal EF for N<sub>2</sub>O was about 0.11 % higher in response to the previous N fertilization. Our study indicates that the current N<sub>2</sub>O EF may severely underestimate emissions because studies ignore legacy effects on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from zero N plots and only compare zero N with N fertilization treatments for a given season or year to derive seasonal or annual N<sub>2</sub>O EF.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":" ","pages":"176532"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The legacy effect of long-term nitrogen fertilization on nitrous oxide emissions.\",\"authors\":\"Xue Tian, Huanhuan Wei, Yibai Zhao, Rui Cao, Chong Zhang, Xiaotong Song, Di Wu, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, Robert M Rees, Pete Smith, Xiaotang Ju\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The primary driver of increasing atmospheric concentrations of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is the use of organic and synthetic fertilizer to increase agricultural crop production. Current global estimates are based on IPCC N<sub>2</sub>O emission factor (EF) calculations, although there are shortcomings as many of the N<sub>2</sub>O EFs are derived from measurements during the cropping season. These neglect the fallow season, and do not adequately account for double or even triple cropping systems or legacy effects on soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in the following year. In this study, we assessed the legacy effect of fertilization on soil N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes using data from a long-term double-cropping field experiment with summer maize and winter wheat in rotation, in which no nitrogen (N; NN) and balanced manure with synthetic N (MN) fertilized treatments were switched to allow an assessment of legacy effects. Based on high-frequency measurements of N<sub>2</sub>O and previous data, we calculated that the historical N fertilization, or legacy effect, explained 23 % of the annual flux of 0.81 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> in the first season of observation. In the following three seasons, the legacy effect of the previous N fertilization regime decreased to a negligible level, with N<sub>2</sub>O emissions mainly driven by in-season fertilization. Our data show that, on average, the seasonal EF for N<sub>2</sub>O was about 0.11 % higher in response to the previous N fertilization. Our study indicates that the current N<sub>2</sub>O EF may severely underestimate emissions because studies ignore legacy effects on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from zero N plots and only compare zero N with N fertilization treatments for a given season or year to derive seasonal or annual N<sub>2</sub>O EF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"176532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176532\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176532","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大气中一氧化二氮(N2O)浓度增加的主要驱动力是使用有机肥和合成肥来提高农作物产量。目前的全球估算是基于 IPCC 的一氧化二氮排放系数(EF)计算得出的,但也存在不足之处,因为许多一氧化二氮排放系数都是通过对作物生长季节的测量得出的。这些数据忽略了休耕季节,没有充分考虑双季甚至三季耕作制度或对下一年土壤一氧化二氮排放的遗留影响。在这项研究中,我们利用夏玉米和冬小麦轮作的长期双茬田间试验数据,评估了施肥对土壤一氧化二氮通量的遗留效应,其中无氮(N;NN)和平衡粪肥与合成氮(MN)施肥处理进行了切换,以便评估遗留效应。根据对一氧化二氮的高频测量和以前的数据,我们计算出,在观察的第一个季节,历史氮肥或遗留效应解释了 0.81 千克氮公顷/年-1 的年通量的 23%。在随后的三个季节中,以前氮肥施用制度的遗留效应下降到可以忽略不计的水平,N2O 排放主要由当季施肥驱动。我们的数据显示,平均而言,N2O 的季节 EF 值因之前的氮肥施用而增加了约 0.11%。我们的研究表明,目前的 N2O EF 可能严重低估了排放量,因为研究忽略了零 N 地块对 N2O 排放的遗留影响,只比较了特定季节或年份的零 N 和 N 施肥处理,从而得出季节或年度 N2O EF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The legacy effect of long-term nitrogen fertilization on nitrous oxide emissions.

The primary driver of increasing atmospheric concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O) is the use of organic and synthetic fertilizer to increase agricultural crop production. Current global estimates are based on IPCC N2O emission factor (EF) calculations, although there are shortcomings as many of the N2O EFs are derived from measurements during the cropping season. These neglect the fallow season, and do not adequately account for double or even triple cropping systems or legacy effects on soil N2O emissions in the following year. In this study, we assessed the legacy effect of fertilization on soil N2O fluxes using data from a long-term double-cropping field experiment with summer maize and winter wheat in rotation, in which no nitrogen (N; NN) and balanced manure with synthetic N (MN) fertilized treatments were switched to allow an assessment of legacy effects. Based on high-frequency measurements of N2O and previous data, we calculated that the historical N fertilization, or legacy effect, explained 23 % of the annual flux of 0.81 kg N ha-1 yr-1 in the first season of observation. In the following three seasons, the legacy effect of the previous N fertilization regime decreased to a negligible level, with N2O emissions mainly driven by in-season fertilization. Our data show that, on average, the seasonal EF for N2O was about 0.11 % higher in response to the previous N fertilization. Our study indicates that the current N2O EF may severely underestimate emissions because studies ignore legacy effects on N2O emissions from zero N plots and only compare zero N with N fertilization treatments for a given season or year to derive seasonal or annual N2O EF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
期刊最新文献
Spatial multi-criteria approaches for estimating geogenic radon hazard index. Exploring changes in epibenthic food web structure after implementation of a water-sediment regulation scheme. Exposure to microplastics contaminated with pharmaceuticals and personal care products: Histological effects on Ucides cordatus. Microbial necromass in soil profiles increases less efficiently than root biomass in long-term fenced grassland: Effects of microbial nitrogen limitation and soil depth. Trophic organization of the benthic communities off the South Italian coasts: A review with a modelistic approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1