Ashley N Bowers, Christina M Tyrakowski, Yukiko Koizumi, Rayhan Shah, Prerna Gopal, Simone Duarte
{"title":"木炭牙膏:关于其安全性和有效性的实验室研究。","authors":"Ashley N Bowers, Christina M Tyrakowski, Yukiko Koizumi, Rayhan Shah, Prerna Gopal, Simone Duarte","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare charcoal-containing dentifrices (CDs) to non-charcoal containing dentifrices (NCDs) through the following experiments: potentially available fluoride, 1-minute fluoride release, pH, cytotoxicity, heavy metals, enamel fluoride uptake (EFU) and relative dentin abrasivity (RDA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine fluoride dentifrices; six CDs and three NCDs were tested (n= 3) for available fluoride, the amount of fluoride released within 1 minute, pH cytotoxicity, heavy metals, EFU and RDA. Four CDs and 1 NCD contained sodium fluoride (NaF) as the active ingredient whereas two dentifrices contained stannous fluoride (SnF₂; 1 CD and 1 NCD), and two dentifrices contained disodium monofluorophosphate (Na₂FPO₃, or Na₂MFP; 1 CD and 1 NCD). Available samples were homogenized and diluted to 1-in-100 in deionized water (DIW). Release samples were prepared as 1-in-4 homogenized dilutions by mass in DIW. Available and release samples were measured in triplicate (n= 3) via fluoride ion-selective electrode (F-ISE) and ion chromatography (IC). ANSI/ADA 130 was followed for pH. L929 cells were cultured using the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay and ISO 10993-5 Annex C MTT cytotoxicity test. Heavy metals testing was performed using a hydrofluoric acid digestion sample preparation method followed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) detection. EFU was performed on enamel specimens that underwent treatment with a CD slurry (1-in-4 dilution) following Test Method #40 of FDA Monograph 21. RDA was performed following ISO 11609 Annex A and the Hefferren method. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc tests (α= 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Available fluoride for all nine dentifrices was between ~93-102% of the labeled amount. The amount of fluoride released after 1 minute of homogenous mixing ranged between 75-107% of the labeled amount. The pH values of the nine dentifrices ranged from 6.5 to 7.7. Charcoal did not significantly contribute to cytotoxicity in L929 cells. The concentrations of each heavy metal (Hg, Cd, As and Pb) present in each of the nine dentifrices were < 1 ppm, indicating trace amounts. The CDs were not significantly more abrasive than the NCDs. The SnF₂ CD had the highest EFU value (644.2 ±131.7 ppm) followed by the NaF CD and the Na₂MFP CD at 492.2± 69.5 ppm and 140.1± 28.1 ppm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Charcoal-containing dentifrices were not found to be significantly more abrasive or cytotoxic than non-charcoal-containing dentifrices. Charcoal and non-charcoal-containing dentifrices were also found to be comparable through experiments determining their fluoride content, pH, enamel fluoride uptake and heavy metals.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"37 5","pages":"255-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Charcoal dentifrices: A laboratory study of their safety and efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley N Bowers, Christina M Tyrakowski, Yukiko Koizumi, Rayhan Shah, Prerna Gopal, Simone Duarte\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare charcoal-containing dentifrices (CDs) to non-charcoal containing dentifrices (NCDs) through the following experiments: potentially available fluoride, 1-minute fluoride release, pH, cytotoxicity, heavy metals, enamel fluoride uptake (EFU) and relative dentin abrasivity (RDA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine fluoride dentifrices; six CDs and three NCDs were tested (n= 3) for available fluoride, the amount of fluoride released within 1 minute, pH cytotoxicity, heavy metals, EFU and RDA. Four CDs and 1 NCD contained sodium fluoride (NaF) as the active ingredient whereas two dentifrices contained stannous fluoride (SnF₂; 1 CD and 1 NCD), and two dentifrices contained disodium monofluorophosphate (Na₂FPO₃, or Na₂MFP; 1 CD and 1 NCD). Available samples were homogenized and diluted to 1-in-100 in deionized water (DIW). Release samples were prepared as 1-in-4 homogenized dilutions by mass in DIW. Available and release samples were measured in triplicate (n= 3) via fluoride ion-selective electrode (F-ISE) and ion chromatography (IC). ANSI/ADA 130 was followed for pH. L929 cells were cultured using the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay and ISO 10993-5 Annex C MTT cytotoxicity test. Heavy metals testing was performed using a hydrofluoric acid digestion sample preparation method followed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) detection. EFU was performed on enamel specimens that underwent treatment with a CD slurry (1-in-4 dilution) following Test Method #40 of FDA Monograph 21. RDA was performed following ISO 11609 Annex A and the Hefferren method. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc tests (α= 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Available fluoride for all nine dentifrices was between ~93-102% of the labeled amount. The amount of fluoride released after 1 minute of homogenous mixing ranged between 75-107% of the labeled amount. The pH values of the nine dentifrices ranged from 6.5 to 7.7. Charcoal did not significantly contribute to cytotoxicity in L929 cells. The concentrations of each heavy metal (Hg, Cd, As and Pb) present in each of the nine dentifrices were < 1 ppm, indicating trace amounts. The CDs were not significantly more abrasive than the NCDs. The SnF₂ CD had the highest EFU value (644.2 ±131.7 ppm) followed by the NaF CD and the Na₂MFP CD at 492.2± 69.5 ppm and 140.1± 28.1 ppm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Charcoal-containing dentifrices were not found to be significantly more abrasive or cytotoxic than non-charcoal-containing dentifrices. Charcoal and non-charcoal-containing dentifrices were also found to be comparable through experiments determining their fluoride content, pH, enamel fluoride uptake and heavy metals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"255-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过以下实验对含炭牙膏(CD)和非含炭牙膏(NCD)进行比较:潜在可用氟化物、1分钟氟化物释放量、pH值、细胞毒性、重金属、牙釉质氟化物吸收(EFU)和相对牙本质磨耗(RDA):对 9 种含氟牙膏(6 种 CD 和 3 种 NCD)(n= 3)进行了可用氟化物、1 分钟内氟化物释放量、pH 值细胞毒性、重金属、EFU 和 RDA 测试。四种 CD 和一种 NCD 的有效成分是氟化钠(NaF),两种牙膏的有效成分是氟化亚锡(SnF₂;1 种 CD 和 1 种 NCD),两种牙膏的有效成分是单氟磷酸钠(Na₂FPO₃,或 Na₂MFP;1 种 CD 和 1 种 NCD)。可用样品在去离子水(DIW)中均质并稀释至 100 分之 1。释放样品在去离子水中按质量稀释为 1 比 4。通过氟离子选择电极(F-ISE)和离子色谱法(IC)对可用样品和释放样品进行一式三份(n= 3)的测量。pH 值遵循 ANSI/ADA 130 标准。使用乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)检测法和 ISO 10993-5 Annex C MTT 细胞毒性检测法培养 L929 细胞。重金属检测采用氢氟酸消解样品制备法,然后进行电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)检测。按照 FDA 第 21 号专著的第 40 号测试方法,对经过 CD 泥浆(1 比 4 稀释)处理的珐琅质样本进行了 EFU 测试。RDA 按照 ISO 11609 附件 A 和 Hefferren 方法进行。数据分析采用单因素方差分析,然后进行事后检验(α= 0.05):所有九种牙膏的可用氟量都在标签量的 93-102% 之间。均匀混合 1 分钟后释放的氟化物量为标记量的 75-107%。九种牙膏的 pH 值介于 6.5 到 7.7 之间。木炭对 L929 细胞的细胞毒性没有明显影响。九种牙膏中每种重金属(汞、镉、砷和铅)的浓度均小于 1 ppm,表明含量微量。CD 的磨蚀性并不比 NCD 明显更强。SnF₂ CD 的 EFU 值最高(644.2 ±131.7 ppm),其次是 NaF CD 和 Na₂MFP CD,分别为 492.2 ± 69.5 ppm 和 140.1 ± 28.1 ppm:临床意义:与不含木炭的牙膏相比,含木炭的牙膏的磨蚀性或细胞毒性并不明显。通过测定含氟量、pH 值、牙釉质氟吸收率和重金属含量,发现含炭牙膏和不含炭牙膏具有可比性。
Charcoal dentifrices: A laboratory study of their safety and efficacy.
Purpose: To compare charcoal-containing dentifrices (CDs) to non-charcoal containing dentifrices (NCDs) through the following experiments: potentially available fluoride, 1-minute fluoride release, pH, cytotoxicity, heavy metals, enamel fluoride uptake (EFU) and relative dentin abrasivity (RDA).
Methods: Nine fluoride dentifrices; six CDs and three NCDs were tested (n= 3) for available fluoride, the amount of fluoride released within 1 minute, pH cytotoxicity, heavy metals, EFU and RDA. Four CDs and 1 NCD contained sodium fluoride (NaF) as the active ingredient whereas two dentifrices contained stannous fluoride (SnF₂; 1 CD and 1 NCD), and two dentifrices contained disodium monofluorophosphate (Na₂FPO₃, or Na₂MFP; 1 CD and 1 NCD). Available samples were homogenized and diluted to 1-in-100 in deionized water (DIW). Release samples were prepared as 1-in-4 homogenized dilutions by mass in DIW. Available and release samples were measured in triplicate (n= 3) via fluoride ion-selective electrode (F-ISE) and ion chromatography (IC). ANSI/ADA 130 was followed for pH. L929 cells were cultured using the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay and ISO 10993-5 Annex C MTT cytotoxicity test. Heavy metals testing was performed using a hydrofluoric acid digestion sample preparation method followed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) detection. EFU was performed on enamel specimens that underwent treatment with a CD slurry (1-in-4 dilution) following Test Method #40 of FDA Monograph 21. RDA was performed following ISO 11609 Annex A and the Hefferren method. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc tests (α= 0.05).
Results: Available fluoride for all nine dentifrices was between ~93-102% of the labeled amount. The amount of fluoride released after 1 minute of homogenous mixing ranged between 75-107% of the labeled amount. The pH values of the nine dentifrices ranged from 6.5 to 7.7. Charcoal did not significantly contribute to cytotoxicity in L929 cells. The concentrations of each heavy metal (Hg, Cd, As and Pb) present in each of the nine dentifrices were < 1 ppm, indicating trace amounts. The CDs were not significantly more abrasive than the NCDs. The SnF₂ CD had the highest EFU value (644.2 ±131.7 ppm) followed by the NaF CD and the Na₂MFP CD at 492.2± 69.5 ppm and 140.1± 28.1 ppm, respectively.
Clinical significance: Charcoal-containing dentifrices were not found to be significantly more abrasive or cytotoxic than non-charcoal-containing dentifrices. Charcoal and non-charcoal-containing dentifrices were also found to be comparable through experiments determining their fluoride content, pH, enamel fluoride uptake and heavy metals.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.