用他们自己的话说:患者讲述乳腺癌手术和重建。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s00266-024-04279-5
Ethan D Paliwoda, Mathew Trandafirescu, Avi A Gajjar, Sanjana Dhulipalla, Nicholas Paliwoda, Jeff J Kim, Benjamin J Schalet
{"title":"用他们自己的话说:患者讲述乳腺癌手术和重建。","authors":"Ethan D Paliwoda, Mathew Trandafirescu, Avi A Gajjar, Sanjana Dhulipalla, Nicholas Paliwoda, Jeff J Kim, Benjamin J Schalet","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04279-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer's global burden prompts a comprehensive understanding of patient experiences surrounding surgical interventions. Social media platforms serve as a new potential avenue for analysis, reflecting patients' coping mechanisms and support-seeking behaviors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study's objective is to further understand patient experiences regarding breast cancer interventions via social media to improve physician-patient dialogue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted of Instagram and TikTok posts surrounding breast cancer surgeries using procedure-related hashtags. Content was categorized to prevalent themes related to Breast-Q foci and was subsequently analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1,028 individuals were analyzed. Posts encompassed double mastectomy (39%), single mastectomy (22%), and combined deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, latissimus dorsi flap, and transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap reconstruction (39%). Frequently identified themes included 'Raising Awareness' (86.87%), 'Spreading Positivity' (53.11%), 'Resiliency' (31.03%), 'Online Support' (24.61%), 'Update of Appearance' (20.82%), 'Recovery/Rehab' (19.94%), and 'Scientific Explanation' (19.75%). Instagram posts more likely encompassed positivity (p < 0.001), resiliency (p = 0.001), and mental health (p = 0.011). TikTok posts more likely (p = 0.001) discussed scientific explanations, decision-making, and symptoms (p < 0.001). Preoperative posts more likely (p < 0.001) surrounded scientific explanations, decision-making, and fear. Postoperative posts more likely (p < 0.001) highlighted appearance updates, recovery/rehab, and positivity (p = 0.012). Experiences with mastectomy and reconstruction differed: recovery/rehab (p < 0.001), scientific explanations (p = 0.015), treatment process (p = 0.003), range of motion (p < 0.001), self-esteem (p = 0.017), and wound management (p = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concerns of patients online reflect Breast-Q measures. Understanding these nuanced patient discussions can provide novel insights for providers. Tailoring interactions through these insights may facilitate enhanced support, discussions, and experiences throughout the treatment journey. Main Points Social media offers a unique insight into personal patient experiences Online breast surgery patient perspectives reflect Breast-Q measures Outlooks from shared online posts may facilitate physician-patient dialogue LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Their Own Words: Patient Narratives of Breast Cancer Surgery and Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Ethan D Paliwoda, Mathew Trandafirescu, Avi A Gajjar, Sanjana Dhulipalla, Nicholas Paliwoda, Jeff J Kim, Benjamin J Schalet\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-024-04279-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer's global burden prompts a comprehensive understanding of patient experiences surrounding surgical interventions. Social media platforms serve as a new potential avenue for analysis, reflecting patients' coping mechanisms and support-seeking behaviors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study's objective is to further understand patient experiences regarding breast cancer interventions via social media to improve physician-patient dialogue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted of Instagram and TikTok posts surrounding breast cancer surgeries using procedure-related hashtags. Content was categorized to prevalent themes related to Breast-Q foci and was subsequently analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1,028 individuals were analyzed. Posts encompassed double mastectomy (39%), single mastectomy (22%), and combined deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, latissimus dorsi flap, and transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap reconstruction (39%). Frequently identified themes included 'Raising Awareness' (86.87%), 'Spreading Positivity' (53.11%), 'Resiliency' (31.03%), 'Online Support' (24.61%), 'Update of Appearance' (20.82%), 'Recovery/Rehab' (19.94%), and 'Scientific Explanation' (19.75%). Instagram posts more likely encompassed positivity (p < 0.001), resiliency (p = 0.001), and mental health (p = 0.011). TikTok posts more likely (p = 0.001) discussed scientific explanations, decision-making, and symptoms (p < 0.001). Preoperative posts more likely (p < 0.001) surrounded scientific explanations, decision-making, and fear. Postoperative posts more likely (p < 0.001) highlighted appearance updates, recovery/rehab, and positivity (p = 0.012). Experiences with mastectomy and reconstruction differed: recovery/rehab (p < 0.001), scientific explanations (p = 0.015), treatment process (p = 0.003), range of motion (p < 0.001), self-esteem (p = 0.017), and wound management (p = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concerns of patients online reflect Breast-Q measures. Understanding these nuanced patient discussions can provide novel insights for providers. Tailoring interactions through these insights may facilitate enhanced support, discussions, and experiences throughout the treatment journey. Main Points Social media offers a unique insight into personal patient experiences Online breast surgery patient perspectives reflect Breast-Q measures Outlooks from shared online posts may facilitate physician-patient dialogue LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04279-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04279-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺癌给全球带来的负担促使人们全面了解围绕手术干预的患者经历。社交媒体平台作为一种新的潜在分析途径,反映了患者的应对机制和寻求支持的行为:本研究的目的是进一步了解患者通过社交媒体进行乳腺癌干预的经历,以改善医患对话:我们使用与手术相关的标签,对围绕乳腺癌手术的 Instagram 和 TikTok 帖子进行了横向研究。研究人员对内容进行了分类,确定了与乳房 Q 病灶相关的流行主题,并随后对其进行了分析:对来自 1,028 人的数据进行了分析。帖子内容包括双乳切除术(39%)、单乳切除术(22%)以及联合下腹上皮穿孔器皮瓣、背阔肌皮瓣和腹直肌横纹肌皮瓣重建术(39%)。常见的主题包括 "提高认识"(86.87%)、"传播积极信息"(53.11%)、"恢复能力"(31.03%)、"在线支持"(24.61%)、"更新外观"(20.82%)、"恢复/康复"(19.94%)和 "科学解释"(19.75%)。Instagram 上的帖子更有可能包含积极(p < 0.001)、恢复能力(p = 0.001)和心理健康(p = 0.011)。TikTok 帖子更有可能(p = 0.001)讨论科学解释、决策和症状(p < 0.001)。术前帖子更有可能(p < 0.001)围绕科学解释、决策和恐惧展开。术后帖子更倾向于(p < 0.001)强调外观更新、恢复/康复和积极性(p = 0.012)。乳房切除术和乳房再造的经历有所不同:恢复/康复(p < 0.001)、科学解释(p = 0.015)、治疗过程(p = 0.003)、活动范围(p < 0.001)、自尊(p = 0.017)和伤口管理(p = 0.008):患者在网上的担忧反映了乳房质量的衡量标准。了解这些细微的患者讨论可为医疗服务提供者提供新的见解。通过这些洞察力来调整互动,可促进在整个治疗过程中加强支持、讨论和体验。要点 社交媒体为了解患者的个人经历提供了独特的视角 在线乳房手术患者的观点反映了乳房质量衡量标准 从共享的在线帖子中获得的观点可促进医患对话 证据等级V:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据等级。有关循证医学评级的完整说明,请参阅目录或在线作者须知 www.springer.com/00266 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In Their Own Words: Patient Narratives of Breast Cancer Surgery and Reconstruction.

Background: Breast cancer's global burden prompts a comprehensive understanding of patient experiences surrounding surgical interventions. Social media platforms serve as a new potential avenue for analysis, reflecting patients' coping mechanisms and support-seeking behaviors.

Objective: This study's objective is to further understand patient experiences regarding breast cancer interventions via social media to improve physician-patient dialogue.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted of Instagram and TikTok posts surrounding breast cancer surgeries using procedure-related hashtags. Content was categorized to prevalent themes related to Breast-Q foci and was subsequently analyzed.

Results: Data from 1,028 individuals were analyzed. Posts encompassed double mastectomy (39%), single mastectomy (22%), and combined deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, latissimus dorsi flap, and transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap reconstruction (39%). Frequently identified themes included 'Raising Awareness' (86.87%), 'Spreading Positivity' (53.11%), 'Resiliency' (31.03%), 'Online Support' (24.61%), 'Update of Appearance' (20.82%), 'Recovery/Rehab' (19.94%), and 'Scientific Explanation' (19.75%). Instagram posts more likely encompassed positivity (p < 0.001), resiliency (p = 0.001), and mental health (p = 0.011). TikTok posts more likely (p = 0.001) discussed scientific explanations, decision-making, and symptoms (p < 0.001). Preoperative posts more likely (p < 0.001) surrounded scientific explanations, decision-making, and fear. Postoperative posts more likely (p < 0.001) highlighted appearance updates, recovery/rehab, and positivity (p = 0.012). Experiences with mastectomy and reconstruction differed: recovery/rehab (p < 0.001), scientific explanations (p = 0.015), treatment process (p = 0.003), range of motion (p < 0.001), self-esteem (p = 0.017), and wound management (p = 0.008).

Conclusion: Concerns of patients online reflect Breast-Q measures. Understanding these nuanced patient discussions can provide novel insights for providers. Tailoring interactions through these insights may facilitate enhanced support, discussions, and experiences throughout the treatment journey. Main Points Social media offers a unique insight into personal patient experiences Online breast surgery patient perspectives reflect Breast-Q measures Outlooks from shared online posts may facilitate physician-patient dialogue LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1