后天性脑损伤患者延迟转入专科康复治疗对疗效的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1177/02692155241284866
Lloyd Bradley, Sally Wheelwright
{"title":"后天性脑损伤患者延迟转入专科康复治疗对疗效的影响。","authors":"Lloyd Bradley, Sally Wheelwright","doi":"10.1177/02692155241284866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effect of time waiting for admission to inpatient neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury on rehabilitation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A specialist brain injury inpatient rehabilitation service.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Consecutive 235 admissions to specialist brain injury rehabilitation following acutely-acquired brain injury between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Waiting time from the point of injury to admission, diagnostic category, admission complexity (patient categorisation tool), functional status (functional independence measure/functional attainment measure), care needs (Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment), change in functional status and care needs over duration of admission (efficiency). Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with a tracheostomy, enteral feeding, anticonvulsant treatment and prior neurosurgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no relationship between admission wait and initial complexity (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= 0.006; <i>p</i> = 0.923), functional status (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.070; <i>p</i> = 0.284) or care needs (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= 0.019; <i>p</i> = 0.768). Longer waiting times were significantly associated with reduced efficiency of rehabilitation (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.240; <i>p</i> = 0.0002) and change of care needs (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.246; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Longer waits were associated with reduced rehabilitation efficiency for patients prescribed anticonvulsants (<i>n</i> = 115; <i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.243; <i>p</i> = 0.009), with a tracheostomy (<i>n</i> = 46; <i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.362; <i>p</i> = 0.013), requiring enteral nutrition (<i>n</i> = 137; <i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.237; <i>p</i> = 0.005) or having had intracranial surgery (<i>n</i> = 97; <i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.344; <i>p</i> = 0.0006). There was a negative association between waiting times and reduction in care needs for patients admitted on anticonvulsants (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.319; <i>p</i> = 0.0005) and requiring enteral nutrition (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.269; <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longer wait for transfer to rehabilitation following brain injury is associated with reduced improvement in functional status and care needs over time. Attention should be given to ensuring rapid transfer into inpatient rehabilitation services.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1552-1558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of delays in transfer to specialist rehabilitation on outcomes in patients with acquired brain injury.\",\"authors\":\"Lloyd Bradley, Sally Wheelwright\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241284866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effect of time waiting for admission to inpatient neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury on rehabilitation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A specialist brain injury inpatient rehabilitation service.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Consecutive 235 admissions to specialist brain injury rehabilitation following acutely-acquired brain injury between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Waiting time from the point of injury to admission, diagnostic category, admission complexity (patient categorisation tool), functional status (functional independence measure/functional attainment measure), care needs (Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment), change in functional status and care needs over duration of admission (efficiency). Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with a tracheostomy, enteral feeding, anticonvulsant treatment and prior neurosurgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no relationship between admission wait and initial complexity (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= 0.006; <i>p</i> = 0.923), functional status (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.070; <i>p</i> = 0.284) or care needs (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= 0.019; <i>p</i> = 0.768). Longer waiting times were significantly associated with reduced efficiency of rehabilitation (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.240; <i>p</i> = 0.0002) and change of care needs (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.246; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Longer waits were associated with reduced rehabilitation efficiency for patients prescribed anticonvulsants (<i>n</i> = 115; <i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.243; <i>p</i> = 0.009), with a tracheostomy (<i>n</i> = 46; <i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.362; <i>p</i> = 0.013), requiring enteral nutrition (<i>n</i> = 137; <i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.237; <i>p</i> = 0.005) or having had intracranial surgery (<i>n</i> = 97; <i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.344; <i>p</i> = 0.0006). There was a negative association between waiting times and reduction in care needs for patients admitted on anticonvulsants (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.319; <i>p</i> = 0.0005) and requiring enteral nutrition (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.269; <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longer wait for transfer to rehabilitation following brain injury is associated with reduced improvement in functional status and care needs over time. Attention should be given to ensuring rapid transfer into inpatient rehabilitation services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1552-1558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241284866\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241284866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定后天性脑损伤住院神经康复治疗的等待时间对康复效果的影响:设计:回顾性观察病例系列:环境:脑损伤专科住院康复服务:2019年至2022年期间连续235名急性获得性脑损伤后入住脑损伤专科康复的患者:从受伤到入院的等待时间、诊断类别、入院复杂性(患者分类工具)、功能状态(功能独立性测量/功能达到测量)、护理需求(诺斯维克公园护理需求评估)、入院期间功能状态和护理需求的变化(效率)。对气管造口术、肠道喂养、抗惊厥治疗和既往接受过神经外科手术的患者进行了分组分析:入院等待时间与初始复杂程度(rs = 0.006; p = 0.923)、功能状态(rs = -0.070; p = 0.284)或护理需求(rs = 0.019; p = 0.768)之间没有关系。等待时间较长与康复效率降低(rs = -0.240;p = 0.0002)和护理需求改变(rs = -0.246;p = 0.0001)明显相关。对于服用抗惊厥药(n = 115;rs = -0.243;p = 0.009)、使用气管造口术(n = 46;rs = -0.362;p = 0.013)、需要肠内营养(n = 137;rs = -0.237;p = 0.005)或接受过颅内手术(n = 97;rs = -0.344;p = 0.0006)的患者,等待时间较长与康复效率降低有关。对于服用抗惊厥药物(rs = -0.319;p = 0.0005)和需要肠内营养(rs = -0.269;p = 0.001)的患者,等待时间与护理需求的减少呈负相关:结论:脑损伤后转入康复中心的等待时间越长,随着时间的推移,功能状态和护理需求的改善程度就越低。应注意确保快速转入住院康复服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of delays in transfer to specialist rehabilitation on outcomes in patients with acquired brain injury.

Objective: To determine the effect of time waiting for admission to inpatient neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury on rehabilitation outcomes.

Design: A retrospective observational case series.

Setting: A specialist brain injury inpatient rehabilitation service.

Subjects: Consecutive 235 admissions to specialist brain injury rehabilitation following acutely-acquired brain injury between 2019 and 2022.

Main measures: Waiting time from the point of injury to admission, diagnostic category, admission complexity (patient categorisation tool), functional status (functional independence measure/functional attainment measure), care needs (Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment), change in functional status and care needs over duration of admission (efficiency). Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with a tracheostomy, enteral feeding, anticonvulsant treatment and prior neurosurgery.

Results: There was no relationship between admission wait and initial complexity (rs = 0.006; p = 0.923), functional status (rs = -0.070; p = 0.284) or care needs (rs = 0.019; p = 0.768). Longer waiting times were significantly associated with reduced efficiency of rehabilitation (rs = -0.240; p = 0.0002) and change of care needs (rs = -0.246; p = 0.0001). Longer waits were associated with reduced rehabilitation efficiency for patients prescribed anticonvulsants (n = 115; rs = -0.243; p = 0.009), with a tracheostomy (n = 46; rs = -0.362; p = 0.013), requiring enteral nutrition (n = 137; rs = -0.237; p = 0.005) or having had intracranial surgery (n = 97; rs = -0.344; p = 0.0006). There was a negative association between waiting times and reduction in care needs for patients admitted on anticonvulsants (rs = -0.319; p = 0.0005) and requiring enteral nutrition (rs = -0.269; p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Longer wait for transfer to rehabilitation following brain injury is associated with reduced improvement in functional status and care needs over time. Attention should be given to ensuring rapid transfer into inpatient rehabilitation services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with physical therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review. Working towards consensus on the assessment of mood after severe acquired brain injury: Focus groups with UK-based professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1