根治性膀胱切除术和淋巴结切除术在治疗临床淋巴结阳性膀胱癌中的作用。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Current Opinion in Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000001230
John Pfail, Benjamin Lichtbroun, David M Golombos, Thomas L Jang, Vignesh T Packiam, Saum Ghodoussipour
{"title":"根治性膀胱切除术和淋巴结切除术在治疗临床淋巴结阳性膀胱癌中的作用。","authors":"John Pfail, Benjamin Lichtbroun, David M Golombos, Thomas L Jang, Vignesh T Packiam, Saum Ghodoussipour","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The role of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with clinically positive lymph nodes is debated. This review examines the role of surgery in treating patients with clinical N1 and more advanced nodal involvement (N2-N3) within a multimodal treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>For clinical N1 disease, guidelines typically recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. However, for N2-N3 disease, guidelines vary. Advances in diagnostics, systemic therapies, and surgical recovery have improved the prognosis for these patients. Research is increasingly identifying MIBC patients, including those with positive nodes, who may achieve complete pathologic response and long-term survival, supporting the role of surgery even in advanced nodal stages.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Managing MIBC with clinically positive lymph nodes, especially in N2-N3 disease, requires a tailored approach. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is standard for N1 disease, the role of surgery in advanced nodal stages is growing because of better patient selection and treatment strategies. Emerging evidence suggests that consolidative surgery may improve outcomes in these complex cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"115-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy in the management of bladder cancer with clinically positive lymph node involvement.\",\"authors\":\"John Pfail, Benjamin Lichtbroun, David M Golombos, Thomas L Jang, Vignesh T Packiam, Saum Ghodoussipour\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The role of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with clinically positive lymph nodes is debated. This review examines the role of surgery in treating patients with clinical N1 and more advanced nodal involvement (N2-N3) within a multimodal treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>For clinical N1 disease, guidelines typically recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. However, for N2-N3 disease, guidelines vary. Advances in diagnostics, systemic therapies, and surgical recovery have improved the prognosis for these patients. Research is increasingly identifying MIBC patients, including those with positive nodes, who may achieve complete pathologic response and long-term survival, supporting the role of surgery even in advanced nodal stages.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Managing MIBC with clinically positive lymph nodes, especially in N2-N3 disease, requires a tailored approach. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is standard for N1 disease, the role of surgery in advanced nodal stages is growing because of better patient selection and treatment strategies. Emerging evidence suggests that consolidative surgery may improve outcomes in these complex cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"115-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617270/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001230\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001230","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:对于临床淋巴结阳性的肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC),根治性膀胱切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术的作用存在争议。本综述探讨了在多模式治疗方法中手术治疗临床N1和晚期结节受累(N2-N3)患者的作用:对于临床 N1 疾病,指南通常建议先进行新辅助化疗,然后再进行手术。然而,对于 N2-N3 疾病,指南的建议则各不相同。诊断、系统疗法和手术康复方面的进步改善了这些患者的预后。研究发现,越来越多的 MIBC 患者(包括淋巴结阳性患者)可以获得完全病理反应和长期生存,这支持了手术在晚期淋巴结分期中的作用。摘要:治疗临床淋巴结阳性的 MIBC,尤其是 N2-N3 疾病,需要采取有针对性的方法。虽然新辅助化疗后进行根治性膀胱切除术是治疗N1疾病的标准方法,但由于患者选择和治疗策略的改进,手术在晚期结节阶段的作用正在不断增强。新的证据表明,合并手术可以改善这些复杂病例的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy in the management of bladder cancer with clinically positive lymph node involvement.

Purpose of review: The role of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with clinically positive lymph nodes is debated. This review examines the role of surgery in treating patients with clinical N1 and more advanced nodal involvement (N2-N3) within a multimodal treatment approach.

Recent findings: For clinical N1 disease, guidelines typically recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. However, for N2-N3 disease, guidelines vary. Advances in diagnostics, systemic therapies, and surgical recovery have improved the prognosis for these patients. Research is increasingly identifying MIBC patients, including those with positive nodes, who may achieve complete pathologic response and long-term survival, supporting the role of surgery even in advanced nodal stages.

Summary: Managing MIBC with clinically positive lymph nodes, especially in N2-N3 disease, requires a tailored approach. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is standard for N1 disease, the role of surgery in advanced nodal stages is growing because of better patient selection and treatment strategies. Emerging evidence suggests that consolidative surgery may improve outcomes in these complex cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
期刊最新文献
Medical therapy for male infertility. A narrative review on the performance and outcomes of penile and scrotal surgery in the ambulatory setting. The role of MRI in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an update from the last two years. Prostatectomy and other local treatments for oligometastatic prostate cancer: recent and ongoing trials. The changing landscape of nonobstructive azoospermia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1