循环运动测试中的心率反应和恢复--正常值及与死亡率的关系。

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae308
Jordi Jou, Xingwu Zhou, Thomas Lindow, Lars Brudin, Kristofer Hedman, Magnus Ekström, Andrei Malinovschi
{"title":"循环运动测试中的心率反应和恢复--正常值及与死亡率的关系。","authors":"Jordi Jou, Xingwu Zhou, Thomas Lindow, Lars Brudin, Kristofer Hedman, Magnus Ekström, Andrei Malinovschi","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Chronotropic incompetence and impaired heart rate (HR) recovery are related to mortality. Guidelines lack specific reference values for HR recovery. We defined normal values and studied blunted HR response and recovery, and mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 9,917 subjects (45% females) aged 18-85 years who performed a cycle exercise test. We defined normal values for peak HR, HR reserve, and HR recovery at 1 and 2 minutes (HRR1 and HRR2) based on individuals apparently healthy (N=2,242). Associations between blunted HR indices (<5th percentile) and mortality over a median follow-up of 8.6 years were analysed using Cox regression and competing risk analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All HR indices were age-dependent and independent predictors of all-cause and CV mortality. The 5th percentiles of HR reserve, HRR1, and HRR2 correlated weakly with existing reference values. HR recovery variables were the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality (HRR1, hazard ratio 1.70 [95% confidence interval, 1.49-1.94] and HRR2, 1.57 [1.37-1.79]), including in subjects with normal exercise capacity (HRR1, 1.96 [1.61-2.39] and HRR2, 1.76 [1.46-2.12]). Combining HR indices appeared to increase the risk of all-cause (HRR1 and HRR2, 1.96 [1.68-2.29] and peak HR and HRR1, 1.87 [1.56-2.23]) and CV mortality, although no specific combination was superior for predicting CV mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All HR variables were age-dependent and associated with all-cause and CV mortality. Blunted HR recovery variables were the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality, even in subjects with normal exercise capacity. Combined blunted HR indices appeared to add prognostic value.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart rate response and recovery in cycle exercise testing - normal values and association with mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Jordi Jou, Xingwu Zhou, Thomas Lindow, Lars Brudin, Kristofer Hedman, Magnus Ekström, Andrei Malinovschi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Chronotropic incompetence and impaired heart rate (HR) recovery are related to mortality. Guidelines lack specific reference values for HR recovery. We defined normal values and studied blunted HR response and recovery, and mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 9,917 subjects (45% females) aged 18-85 years who performed a cycle exercise test. We defined normal values for peak HR, HR reserve, and HR recovery at 1 and 2 minutes (HRR1 and HRR2) based on individuals apparently healthy (N=2,242). Associations between blunted HR indices (<5th percentile) and mortality over a median follow-up of 8.6 years were analysed using Cox regression and competing risk analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All HR indices were age-dependent and independent predictors of all-cause and CV mortality. The 5th percentiles of HR reserve, HRR1, and HRR2 correlated weakly with existing reference values. HR recovery variables were the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality (HRR1, hazard ratio 1.70 [95% confidence interval, 1.49-1.94] and HRR2, 1.57 [1.37-1.79]), including in subjects with normal exercise capacity (HRR1, 1.96 [1.61-2.39] and HRR2, 1.76 [1.46-2.12]). Combining HR indices appeared to increase the risk of all-cause (HRR1 and HRR2, 1.96 [1.68-2.29] and peak HR and HRR1, 1.87 [1.56-2.23]) and CV mortality, although no specific combination was superior for predicting CV mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All HR variables were age-dependent and associated with all-cause and CV mortality. Blunted HR recovery variables were the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality, even in subjects with normal exercise capacity. Combined blunted HR indices appeared to add prognostic value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae308\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:嗜铬细胞功能不全和心率(HR)恢复受损与死亡率有关。指南缺乏心率恢复的具体参考值。我们定义了正常值,并研究了心率反应和恢复能力减弱以及死亡风险:我们纳入了 9,917 名年龄在 18-85 岁之间、进行过自行车运动测试的受试者(45% 为女性)。我们根据明显健康的个体(2242 人)定义了峰值心率、心率储备以及 1 分钟和 2 分钟心率恢复(HRR1 和 HRR2)的正常值。心率指数钝化之间的关联(结果:所有心率指数都与年龄有关,是全因死亡率和冠心病死亡率的独立预测因素。心率储备、HRR1 和 HRR2 的第 5 百分位数与现有参考值的相关性较弱。心率恢复变量是全因死亡率的最强预测因子(HRR1,危险比 1.70 [95%置信区间,1.49-1.94];HRR2,1.57 [1.37-1.79]),包括运动能力正常的受试者(HRR1,1.96 [1.61-2.39];HRR2,1.76 [1.46-2.12])。结合心率指数似乎会增加全因(HRR1 和 HRR2,1.96 [1.68-2.29];峰值心率和 HRR1,1.87 [1.56-2.23])和心血管死亡的风险,尽管没有特定的组合在预测心血管死亡方面更有优势:所有心率变量都与年龄有关,并与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率相关。心率恢复钝化变量是全因死亡率的最强预测因素,即使是运动能力正常的受试者也是如此。综合的心率钝化指数似乎增加了预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heart rate response and recovery in cycle exercise testing - normal values and association with mortality.

Aim: Chronotropic incompetence and impaired heart rate (HR) recovery are related to mortality. Guidelines lack specific reference values for HR recovery. We defined normal values and studied blunted HR response and recovery, and mortality risk.

Methods: We included 9,917 subjects (45% females) aged 18-85 years who performed a cycle exercise test. We defined normal values for peak HR, HR reserve, and HR recovery at 1 and 2 minutes (HRR1 and HRR2) based on individuals apparently healthy (N=2,242). Associations between blunted HR indices (<5th percentile) and mortality over a median follow-up of 8.6 years were analysed using Cox regression and competing risk analysis.

Results: All HR indices were age-dependent and independent predictors of all-cause and CV mortality. The 5th percentiles of HR reserve, HRR1, and HRR2 correlated weakly with existing reference values. HR recovery variables were the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality (HRR1, hazard ratio 1.70 [95% confidence interval, 1.49-1.94] and HRR2, 1.57 [1.37-1.79]), including in subjects with normal exercise capacity (HRR1, 1.96 [1.61-2.39] and HRR2, 1.76 [1.46-2.12]). Combining HR indices appeared to increase the risk of all-cause (HRR1 and HRR2, 1.96 [1.68-2.29] and peak HR and HRR1, 1.87 [1.56-2.23]) and CV mortality, although no specific combination was superior for predicting CV mortality.

Conclusions: All HR variables were age-dependent and associated with all-cause and CV mortality. Blunted HR recovery variables were the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality, even in subjects with normal exercise capacity. Combined blunted HR indices appeared to add prognostic value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
期刊最新文献
REDUCE-IT, biomarkers, and confirmation bias: are we missing the forest for the trees? Strike early-strike strong lipid-lowering strategy with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome patients: real-world evidence from the AT-TARGET-IT registry. Eligibility for lipid-lowering therapy when applying systemic coronary risk estimation 2 according to guidelines on apparently healthy middle-aged individuals. Use of combination therapy is associated with improved LDL cholesterol management: 1-year follow-up results from the European observational SANTORINI study. Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on coronary revascularization and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1