预防心房颤动中风的现有药物疗法的安全性。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2409698
G Denas, G Santostasi, V Pengo
{"title":"预防心房颤动中风的现有药物疗法的安全性。","authors":"G Denas, G Santostasi, V Pengo","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2409698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral anticoagulant drugs reduce the risk of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists, gold standard therapy for decades, have been deposed by the direct oral anticoagulants that exhibit superior safety profiles. However, hemorrhagic complications remain a major concern to anticoagulation.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We searched available data in the literature to review the current knowledge on the safety profiles of available anticoagulants.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite a relevant leap forward with the introduction of DOACs, safety concerns persist in some fields of the current pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. In-depth knowledge of the safety profile of available anticoagulants and dealing with safety issues in patient subgroups is of utmost importance. Bleeding risk scores should not be dichotomously used to decide anticoagulation treatment but rather to promote shared decision, identify and correct modifiable risk factors, and set monitoring frequency. Additional issues that wait to be investigated in order to improve the safety of therapy include circulating levels of direct oral anticoagulants and anticoagulation in patient sub-groups: very elderly, frail, those with advanced kidney or liver disease, and so on. Safety may be improved from the in-depth knowledge of safety concerns and therapeutic options.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The safety of available pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"G Denas, G Santostasi, V Pengo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2409698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral anticoagulant drugs reduce the risk of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists, gold standard therapy for decades, have been deposed by the direct oral anticoagulants that exhibit superior safety profiles. However, hemorrhagic complications remain a major concern to anticoagulation.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We searched available data in the literature to review the current knowledge on the safety profiles of available anticoagulants.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite a relevant leap forward with the introduction of DOACs, safety concerns persist in some fields of the current pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. In-depth knowledge of the safety profile of available anticoagulants and dealing with safety issues in patient subgroups is of utmost importance. Bleeding risk scores should not be dichotomously used to decide anticoagulation treatment but rather to promote shared decision, identify and correct modifiable risk factors, and set monitoring frequency. Additional issues that wait to be investigated in order to improve the safety of therapy include circulating levels of direct oral anticoagulants and anticoagulation in patient sub-groups: very elderly, frail, those with advanced kidney or liver disease, and so on. Safety may be improved from the in-depth knowledge of safety concerns and therapeutic options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2409698\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2409698","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:口服抗凝药物可降低与心房颤动相关的中风风险。维生素 K 拮抗剂是数十年来的金标准疗法,如今已被安全性更高的直接口服抗凝剂所取代。然而,出血性并发症仍然是抗凝治疗的一个主要问题:我们搜索了文献中的可用数据,回顾了目前关于现有抗凝剂安全性的知识:专家观点:尽管随着 DOACs 的问世实现了相关的飞跃,但目前预防心房颤动卒中的药物治疗在某些领域仍存在安全性问题。深入了解现有抗凝药物的安全性概况以及处理患者亚群的安全性问题至关重要。不应将出血风险评分二分法用于决定抗凝治疗,而应促进共同决策、识别和纠正可改变的风险因素并设定监测频率。为提高治疗的安全性,还有其他问题有待研究,包括直接口服抗凝剂的循环水平和患者亚群的抗凝治疗:高龄、体弱、晚期肝肾疾病患者等。通过深入了解安全问题和治疗方案,可以提高安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The safety of available pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Introduction: Oral anticoagulant drugs reduce the risk of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists, gold standard therapy for decades, have been deposed by the direct oral anticoagulants that exhibit superior safety profiles. However, hemorrhagic complications remain a major concern to anticoagulation.

Areas covered: We searched available data in the literature to review the current knowledge on the safety profiles of available anticoagulants.

Expert opinion: Despite a relevant leap forward with the introduction of DOACs, safety concerns persist in some fields of the current pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. In-depth knowledge of the safety profile of available anticoagulants and dealing with safety issues in patient subgroups is of utmost importance. Bleeding risk scores should not be dichotomously used to decide anticoagulation treatment but rather to promote shared decision, identify and correct modifiable risk factors, and set monitoring frequency. Additional issues that wait to be investigated in order to improve the safety of therapy include circulating levels of direct oral anticoagulants and anticoagulation in patient sub-groups: very elderly, frail, those with advanced kidney or liver disease, and so on. Safety may be improved from the in-depth knowledge of safety concerns and therapeutic options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Adverse events associated with aromatase inhibitors: an analysis of real-world datasets and drug-gene interaction network. Real-world analysis of levetiracetam-associated rhabdomyolysis: insights from the FDA adverse event reporting system. Ocular adverse events associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a real-world study based on the FAERS database and network pharmacology. Is metformin safe in pregnancy: a focus on offspring outcomes. Drug-induced noninfectious myocarditis: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1