免疫原性试验中未达预设疗效阈值的肺炎球菌血清型:来自国家免疫计划的实际证据。

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Expert Review of Vaccines Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1080/14760584.2024.2409662
Johnna Perdrizet, Michele Wilson, Warisa Wannaadisai, Kevin Apodaca, Lindsay Grant
{"title":"免疫原性试验中未达预设疗效阈值的肺炎球菌血清型:来自国家免疫计划的实际证据。","authors":"Johnna Perdrizet, Michele Wilson, Warisa Wannaadisai, Kevin Apodaca, Lindsay Grant","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2024.2409662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The 13-valent (PCV13) and 10-valent (PCV10) pneumococcal conjugate vaccines missed non-inferiority for certain 7-valent (PCV7) serotypes in immunogenicity trials. This study examines the population-level IPD case trends for these serotypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified six countries with national IPD surveillance data that introduced PCV13 (Canada, Germany, Israel, Italy, South Africa, and the United States) and three with PCV10 (Finland, Brazil, and the Netherlands). We extracted country-specific annual IPD case counts for PCV7 serotypes that missed non-inferiority and met non-inferiority (6B + 23F and PCV7 minus [6B + 23F] serotypes for PCV10 countries; 6B +9V + 23F, and PCV7 minus [6B +9V + 23F] serotypes for PCV13 countries) in clinical trials. Case count data for each country were plotted for observed serotype trends in different age groups (<5 and ≥5 years) for 8 years following PCV13/PCV10 introduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all ages and countries, IPD cases due to PCV7 serotypes that missed non-inferiority either decreased or remained suppressed following PCV13/PCV10 introduction. Similar trends were found for PCV7 serotypes that met non-inferiority in those <5 years. Paradoxically, cases increased in those ≥5 years in Canada, Italy, and the US, primarily driven by increases in serotypes 4 and 19F disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite missing non-inferiority of serotypes in immunogenicity trials, higher-valent PCVs effectively suppressed these serotypes across all ages. Non-inferiority criteria from immunogenicity trials may not fully predict real-world disease impact after PCV implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pneumococcal serotypes missing prespecified efficacy threshold in immunogenicity trials: real-world evidence from national immunization programs.\",\"authors\":\"Johnna Perdrizet, Michele Wilson, Warisa Wannaadisai, Kevin Apodaca, Lindsay Grant\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14760584.2024.2409662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The 13-valent (PCV13) and 10-valent (PCV10) pneumococcal conjugate vaccines missed non-inferiority for certain 7-valent (PCV7) serotypes in immunogenicity trials. This study examines the population-level IPD case trends for these serotypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified six countries with national IPD surveillance data that introduced PCV13 (Canada, Germany, Israel, Italy, South Africa, and the United States) and three with PCV10 (Finland, Brazil, and the Netherlands). We extracted country-specific annual IPD case counts for PCV7 serotypes that missed non-inferiority and met non-inferiority (6B + 23F and PCV7 minus [6B + 23F] serotypes for PCV10 countries; 6B +9V + 23F, and PCV7 minus [6B +9V + 23F] serotypes for PCV13 countries) in clinical trials. Case count data for each country were plotted for observed serotype trends in different age groups (<5 and ≥5 years) for 8 years following PCV13/PCV10 introduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all ages and countries, IPD cases due to PCV7 serotypes that missed non-inferiority either decreased or remained suppressed following PCV13/PCV10 introduction. Similar trends were found for PCV7 serotypes that met non-inferiority in those <5 years. Paradoxically, cases increased in those ≥5 years in Canada, Italy, and the US, primarily driven by increases in serotypes 4 and 19F disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite missing non-inferiority of serotypes in immunogenicity trials, higher-valent PCVs effectively suppressed these serotypes across all ages. Non-inferiority criteria from immunogenicity trials may not fully predict real-world disease impact after PCV implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Vaccines\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Vaccines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2024.2409662\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2024.2409662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:13 价 (PCV13) 和 10 价 (PCV10) 肺炎球菌结合疫苗在免疫原性试验中错过了某些 7 价 (PCV7) 血清型的非劣效性。本研究探讨了这些血清型的人群 IPD 病例趋势:我们确定了 6 个拥有全国 IPD 监测数据、引入 PCV13 的国家(加拿大、德国、以色列、意大利、南非和美国)和 3 个引入 PCV10 的国家(芬兰、巴西和荷兰)。我们提取了不同年龄组达到非劣效性血清型(4、14、18C、19F、9 V [仅 PCV10])和未达到非劣效性血清型(6B、23F、9 V [仅 PCV13])的各国年度 IPD 病例数(结果:在所有年龄组和国家,PCV13/PCV10 引入后,因 PCV7 血清型错过非劣效性而导致的 IPD 病例要么减少,要么保持抑制。在这些国家,达到非劣效性的 PCV7 血清型也出现了类似的趋势:尽管在免疫原性试验中血清型未达到非劣效性标准,但高价 PCV 可有效抑制所有年龄段的这些血清型。免疫原性试验的非劣效性标准可能无法完全预测 PCV 实施后对实际疾病的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pneumococcal serotypes missing prespecified efficacy threshold in immunogenicity trials: real-world evidence from national immunization programs.

Objectives: The 13-valent (PCV13) and 10-valent (PCV10) pneumococcal conjugate vaccines missed non-inferiority for certain 7-valent (PCV7) serotypes in immunogenicity trials. This study examines the population-level IPD case trends for these serotypes.

Methods: We identified six countries with national IPD surveillance data that introduced PCV13 (Canada, Germany, Israel, Italy, South Africa, and the United States) and three with PCV10 (Finland, Brazil, and the Netherlands). We extracted country-specific annual IPD case counts for PCV7 serotypes that missed non-inferiority and met non-inferiority (6B + 23F and PCV7 minus [6B + 23F] serotypes for PCV10 countries; 6B +9V + 23F, and PCV7 minus [6B +9V + 23F] serotypes for PCV13 countries) in clinical trials. Case count data for each country were plotted for observed serotype trends in different age groups (<5 and ≥5 years) for 8 years following PCV13/PCV10 introduction.

Results: For all ages and countries, IPD cases due to PCV7 serotypes that missed non-inferiority either decreased or remained suppressed following PCV13/PCV10 introduction. Similar trends were found for PCV7 serotypes that met non-inferiority in those <5 years. Paradoxically, cases increased in those ≥5 years in Canada, Italy, and the US, primarily driven by increases in serotypes 4 and 19F disease.

Conclusions: Despite missing non-inferiority of serotypes in immunogenicity trials, higher-valent PCVs effectively suppressed these serotypes across all ages. Non-inferiority criteria from immunogenicity trials may not fully predict real-world disease impact after PCV implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Vaccines
Expert Review of Vaccines 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Vaccines (ISSN 1476-0584) provides expert commentary on the development, application, and clinical effectiveness of new vaccines. Coverage includes vaccine technology, vaccine adjuvants, prophylactic vaccines, therapeutic vaccines, AIDS vaccines and vaccines for defence against bioterrorism. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The vaccine field has been transformed by recent technological advances, but there remain many challenges in the delivery of cost-effective, safe vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines facilitates decision making to drive forward this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Hookworm vaccines: current and future directions. A descriptive review on the real-world impact of Moderna, inc. COVID-19 vaccines. Estimating the time required to reach HPV vaccination targets across Europe. Vaccination strategies for patients under monoclonal antibody and other biological treatments: an updated comprehensive review based on EMA authorizations to January 2024. Comparison of preclinical efficacy of immunotherapies against HPV-induced cancers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1