诊断疑似遗传性白质紊乱症患者的方法。

Guy Helman, Jennifer L Orthmann-Murphy, Adeline Vanderver
{"title":"诊断疑似遗传性白质紊乱症患者的方法。","authors":"Guy Helman, Jennifer L Orthmann-Murphy, Adeline Vanderver","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00009-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leukodystrophies are heritable disorders with white matter abnormalities observed on central nervous system magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatric leukodystrophies have long been known for their classically high, \"unsolved\" rate. Indeed, these disorders provide a diagnostic dilemma for many clinicians as over 100 genetic disorders alone may present with white matter abnormalities, with this figure not taking into account the substantial number of infectious agents, toxicities, and acquired disorders that may affect the white matter of the brain. Achieving a diagnosis may be the single most important step in the clinical course of a leukodystrophy-affected individual, with important implications for care and quality of life. For certain disorders, prompt recognition can direct therapeutic intervention with significant implications and requires urgent recognition. In this review, we cover newborn screening efforts, standard-of-care testing methodologies, and next generation sequencing approaches that continue to change the landscape of leukodystrophy diagnosis. Early studies have shown that next generation sequencing approaches, particularly exome and now genome sequencing have proven to be powerful in helping resolve many cases that were refractory to a single gene or linkage analysis approach. In addition, other methods are required for cases that remain persistently unsolved after next generation sequencing methods have been used. In the past more than half of affected individuals never achieved an etiologic diagnosis, and when they did, the reported times to diagnosis were >5 years although molecular testing has allowed this to be reduced to closer to 16 months. For affected families, next generation sequencing technologies have finally provided a way to fill gaps in diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":"204 ","pages":"21-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to diagnosis for individuals with a suspected inherited white matter disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Guy Helman, Jennifer L Orthmann-Murphy, Adeline Vanderver\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00009-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Leukodystrophies are heritable disorders with white matter abnormalities observed on central nervous system magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatric leukodystrophies have long been known for their classically high, \\\"unsolved\\\" rate. Indeed, these disorders provide a diagnostic dilemma for many clinicians as over 100 genetic disorders alone may present with white matter abnormalities, with this figure not taking into account the substantial number of infectious agents, toxicities, and acquired disorders that may affect the white matter of the brain. Achieving a diagnosis may be the single most important step in the clinical course of a leukodystrophy-affected individual, with important implications for care and quality of life. For certain disorders, prompt recognition can direct therapeutic intervention with significant implications and requires urgent recognition. In this review, we cover newborn screening efforts, standard-of-care testing methodologies, and next generation sequencing approaches that continue to change the landscape of leukodystrophy diagnosis. Early studies have shown that next generation sequencing approaches, particularly exome and now genome sequencing have proven to be powerful in helping resolve many cases that were refractory to a single gene or linkage analysis approach. In addition, other methods are required for cases that remain persistently unsolved after next generation sequencing methods have been used. In the past more than half of affected individuals never achieved an etiologic diagnosis, and when they did, the reported times to diagnosis were >5 years although molecular testing has allowed this to be reduced to closer to 16 months. For affected families, next generation sequencing technologies have finally provided a way to fill gaps in diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handbook of clinical neurology\",\"volume\":\"204 \",\"pages\":\"21-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handbook of clinical neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00009-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of clinical neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99209-1.00009-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

白质营养不良症是一种遗传性疾病,在中枢神经系统磁共振成像中可观察到白质异常。长期以来,小儿白质营养不良症一直以其经典的高 "未解决 "率而闻名。事实上,这些疾病给许多临床医生带来了诊断难题,因为仅遗传性疾病就有 100 多种可能出现脑白质异常,而这一数字还未考虑大量可能影响脑白质的感染性病原体、中毒和后天性疾病。确诊可能是白质营养不良症患者临床过程中最重要的一步,对护理和生活质量具有重要影响。对于某些疾病来说,及时发现可以指导治疗干预,具有重要意义,因此需要紧急确认。在这篇综述中,我们将介绍新生儿筛查工作、标准检测方法和新一代测序方法,它们将继续改变白营养不良症诊断的格局。早期研究表明,新一代测序方法,尤其是外显子组测序和现在的基因组测序,已被证明可以帮助解决许多单基因或连锁分析方法无法解决的病例。此外,对于使用新一代测序方法后仍无法解决的病例,还需要其他方法。过去,半数以上的患者从未获得病因学诊断,即使获得了病因学诊断,报告的诊断时间也超过 5 年,尽管分子检测已将诊断时间缩短至接近 16 个月。对于受影响的家庭来说,新一代测序技术终于提供了一种填补诊断空白的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Approaches to diagnosis for individuals with a suspected inherited white matter disorder.

Leukodystrophies are heritable disorders with white matter abnormalities observed on central nervous system magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatric leukodystrophies have long been known for their classically high, "unsolved" rate. Indeed, these disorders provide a diagnostic dilemma for many clinicians as over 100 genetic disorders alone may present with white matter abnormalities, with this figure not taking into account the substantial number of infectious agents, toxicities, and acquired disorders that may affect the white matter of the brain. Achieving a diagnosis may be the single most important step in the clinical course of a leukodystrophy-affected individual, with important implications for care and quality of life. For certain disorders, prompt recognition can direct therapeutic intervention with significant implications and requires urgent recognition. In this review, we cover newborn screening efforts, standard-of-care testing methodologies, and next generation sequencing approaches that continue to change the landscape of leukodystrophy diagnosis. Early studies have shown that next generation sequencing approaches, particularly exome and now genome sequencing have proven to be powerful in helping resolve many cases that were refractory to a single gene or linkage analysis approach. In addition, other methods are required for cases that remain persistently unsolved after next generation sequencing methods have been used. In the past more than half of affected individuals never achieved an etiologic diagnosis, and when they did, the reported times to diagnosis were >5 years although molecular testing has allowed this to be reduced to closer to 16 months. For affected families, next generation sequencing technologies have finally provided a way to fill gaps in diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Handbook of clinical neurology
Handbook of clinical neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: The Handbook of Clinical Neurology (HCN) was originally conceived and edited by Pierre Vinken and George Bruyn as a prestigious, multivolume reference work that would cover all the disorders encountered by clinicians and researchers engaged in neurology and allied fields. The first series of the Handbook (Volumes 1-44) was published between 1968 and 1982 and was followed by a second series (Volumes 45-78), guided by the same editors, which concluded in 2002. By that time, the Handbook had come to represent one of the largest scientific works ever published. In 2002, Professors Michael J. Aminoff, François Boller, and Dick F. Swaab took on the responsibility of supervising the third (current) series, the first volumes of which published in 2003. They have designed this series to encompass both clinical neurology and also the basic and clinical neurosciences that are its underpinning. Given the enormity and complexity of the accumulating literature, it is almost impossible to keep abreast of developments in the field, thus providing the raison d''être for the series. The series will thus appeal to clinicians and investigators alike, providing to each an added dimension. Now, more than 140 volumes after it began, the Handbook of Clinical Neurology series has an unparalleled reputation for providing the latest information on fundamental research on the operation of the nervous system in health and disease, comprehensive clinical information on neurological and related disorders, and up-to-date treatment protocols.
期刊最新文献
5-HT1F agonists. Biobehavioral treatments of migraine. CGRP monoclonal antibodies and CGRP receptor antagonists (Gepants) in migraine prevention. CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants). Comorbidities of migraine: Sleep disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1