Hisham Moosan, Arun Kumar Sharma, Mahendra Thakor, Ansuman Panigrahi, Vikas Dhikav, Suresh Yadav, Ramesh Kumar Huda, Mukesh C Parmar, Poonam Singh, Suman S Mohanty, Denny John
{"title":"印度心血管疾病实施研究:系统回顾。","authors":"Hisham Moosan, Arun Kumar Sharma, Mahendra Thakor, Ansuman Panigrahi, Vikas Dhikav, Suresh Yadav, Ramesh Kumar Huda, Mukesh C Parmar, Poonam Singh, Suman S Mohanty, Denny John","doi":"10.4103/ijph.ijph_1032_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally and the prevention and control of these diseases tend to entail longer and larger social and economic commitments on the part of governments. This systematic review (SR) aims to understand the quantum, diversity, and quality of implementation research (IR) done in the field of CVDs in India with a view to maximizing the utility of the efforts made by the government. The evidence was collated on IR on CVDs in India conducted in the past 20 years (2001-2021) using a SR approach. The SR was drafted using Preferred Reporting Items for SRs and Meta-analyses guidelines. Academic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Science Direct) and nonacademic databases (Google Scholar and ProQuest) were chosen, along with repositories of gray literature. Retrieved articles were screened for titles and abstracts and assessed by two independent reviewers. The articles also underwent a concomitant risk of bias assessment utilizing checklists (STARI, STROBE, CONSORT, etc.,) and a narrative summary was drafted using SwiM guidelines. In the final analysis, 10 articles that fitted the inclusion criteria of IR for CVD in India were included, of which seven were directed at IR on hypertension, and three were related to coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Acceptability, adoption, and feasibility were the only attributes of IR that were explored in these studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13298,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of public health","volume":"68 3","pages":"418-423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation Research on Cardiovascular Diseases in India: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Hisham Moosan, Arun Kumar Sharma, Mahendra Thakor, Ansuman Panigrahi, Vikas Dhikav, Suresh Yadav, Ramesh Kumar Huda, Mukesh C Parmar, Poonam Singh, Suman S Mohanty, Denny John\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijph.ijph_1032_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally and the prevention and control of these diseases tend to entail longer and larger social and economic commitments on the part of governments. This systematic review (SR) aims to understand the quantum, diversity, and quality of implementation research (IR) done in the field of CVDs in India with a view to maximizing the utility of the efforts made by the government. The evidence was collated on IR on CVDs in India conducted in the past 20 years (2001-2021) using a SR approach. The SR was drafted using Preferred Reporting Items for SRs and Meta-analyses guidelines. Academic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Science Direct) and nonacademic databases (Google Scholar and ProQuest) were chosen, along with repositories of gray literature. Retrieved articles were screened for titles and abstracts and assessed by two independent reviewers. The articles also underwent a concomitant risk of bias assessment utilizing checklists (STARI, STROBE, CONSORT, etc.,) and a narrative summary was drafted using SwiM guidelines. In the final analysis, 10 articles that fitted the inclusion criteria of IR for CVD in India were included, of which seven were directed at IR on hypertension, and three were related to coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Acceptability, adoption, and feasibility were the only attributes of IR that were explored in these studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of public health\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"418-423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_1032_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_1032_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:心血管疾病(CVDs)是导致全球死亡的主要原因,预防和控制这些疾病往往需要政府做出更长、更大的社会和经济承诺。本系统综述(SR)旨在了解印度在心血管疾病领域开展的实施研究(IR)的数量、多样性和质量,以期最大限度地发挥政府所做努力的效用。我们采用 SR 方法整理了过去 20 年(2001-2021 年)印度开展的心血管疾病实施研究的证据。研究报告是根据研究报告和 Meta 分析指南的首选报告项目起草的。选择了学术数据库(PubMed、Embase 和 Science Direct)和非学术数据库(Google Scholar 和 ProQuest)以及灰色文献库。检索到的文章均经过标题和摘要筛选,并由两名独立审稿人进行评估。这些文章还同时利用核对表(STARI、STROBE、CONSORT 等)进行了偏倚风险评估,并根据 SwiM 指南起草了叙述性摘要。在最终分析中,共纳入了 10 篇符合印度心血管疾病 IR 纳入标准的文章,其中 7 篇针对高血压的 IR,3 篇与冠心病、心肌梗死和中风有关。可接受性、采用率和可行性是这些研究探讨的 IR 的唯一属性。
Implementation Research on Cardiovascular Diseases in India: A Systematic Review.
Summary: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally and the prevention and control of these diseases tend to entail longer and larger social and economic commitments on the part of governments. This systematic review (SR) aims to understand the quantum, diversity, and quality of implementation research (IR) done in the field of CVDs in India with a view to maximizing the utility of the efforts made by the government. The evidence was collated on IR on CVDs in India conducted in the past 20 years (2001-2021) using a SR approach. The SR was drafted using Preferred Reporting Items for SRs and Meta-analyses guidelines. Academic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Science Direct) and nonacademic databases (Google Scholar and ProQuest) were chosen, along with repositories of gray literature. Retrieved articles were screened for titles and abstracts and assessed by two independent reviewers. The articles also underwent a concomitant risk of bias assessment utilizing checklists (STARI, STROBE, CONSORT, etc.,) and a narrative summary was drafted using SwiM guidelines. In the final analysis, 10 articles that fitted the inclusion criteria of IR for CVD in India were included, of which seven were directed at IR on hypertension, and three were related to coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Acceptability, adoption, and feasibility were the only attributes of IR that were explored in these studies.
期刊介绍:
Indian Journal of Public Health is a peer-reviewed international journal published Quarterly by the Indian Public Health Association. It is indexed / abstracted by the major international indexing systems like Index Medicus/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PUBMED, etc. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles. The Indian Journal of Public Health publishes articles of authors from India and abroad with special emphasis on original research findings that are relevant for developing country perspectives including India. The journal considers publication of articles as original article, review article, special article, brief research article, CME / Education forum, commentary, letters to editor, case series reports, etc. The journal covers population based studies, impact assessment, monitoring and evaluation, systematic review, meta-analysis, clinic-social studies etc., related to any domain and discipline of public health, specially relevant to national priorities, including ethical and social issues. Articles aligned with national health issues and policy implications are prefered.