AngioPy分割:用于冠状动脉分割的开源、用户指导型深度学习工具。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS International journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132598
Thabo Mahendiran , Dorina Thanou , Ortal Senouf , Yassine Jamaa , Stephane Fournier , Bernard De Bruyne , Emmanuel Abbé , Olivier Muller , Edward Andò
{"title":"AngioPy分割:用于冠状动脉分割的开源、用户指导型深度学习工具。","authors":"Thabo Mahendiran ,&nbsp;Dorina Thanou ,&nbsp;Ortal Senouf ,&nbsp;Yassine Jamaa ,&nbsp;Stephane Fournier ,&nbsp;Bernard De Bruyne ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Abbé ,&nbsp;Olivier Muller ,&nbsp;Edward Andò","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) typically employs traditional edge detection algorithms that often require manual correction. This has important implications for the accuracy of downstream 3D coronary reconstructions and computed haemodynamic indices (e.g. angiography-derived fractional flow reserve).</div><div>We developed <em>AngioPy</em>, a deep-learning model for coronary segmentation that employs user-defined ground-truth points to boost performance and minimise manual correction. We compared its performance without correction with an established QCA system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Deep learning models integrating user-defined ground-truth points were developed using 2455 images from the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2 (FAME 2) study. External validation was performed on a dataset of 580 images. Vessel dimensions from 203 images with mild/moderate stenoses segmented by <em>AngioPy</em> (without correction) and an established QCA system (Medis QFR®) were compared (609 diameters).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The top-performing model had an average F1 score of 0.927 (pixel accuracy 0.998, precision 0.925, sensitivity 0.930, specificity 0.999) with 99.2 % of masks exhibiting an F1 score &gt; 0.8. Similar results were seen with external validation (F1 score 0.924, pixel accuracy 0.997, precision 0.921, sensitivity 0.929, specificity 0.999). Vessel dimensions from <em>AngioPy</em> exhibited excellent agreement with QCA (<em>r</em> = 0.96 [95 % CI 0.95–0.96], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; mean difference − 0.18 mm [limits of agreement (LOA): −0.84 to 0.49]), including the minimal luminal diameter (<em>r</em> = 0.93 [95 % CI 0.91–0.95], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; mean difference − 0.06 mm [LOA: −0.70 to 0.59]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div><em>AngioPy</em>, an open-source tool, performs rapid and accurate coronary segmentation without the need for manual correction. It has the potential to increase the accuracy and efficiency of QCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"418 ","pages":"Article 132598"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AngioPy Segmentation: An open-source, user-guided deep learning tool for coronary artery segmentation\",\"authors\":\"Thabo Mahendiran ,&nbsp;Dorina Thanou ,&nbsp;Ortal Senouf ,&nbsp;Yassine Jamaa ,&nbsp;Stephane Fournier ,&nbsp;Bernard De Bruyne ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Abbé ,&nbsp;Olivier Muller ,&nbsp;Edward Andò\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) typically employs traditional edge detection algorithms that often require manual correction. This has important implications for the accuracy of downstream 3D coronary reconstructions and computed haemodynamic indices (e.g. angiography-derived fractional flow reserve).</div><div>We developed <em>AngioPy</em>, a deep-learning model for coronary segmentation that employs user-defined ground-truth points to boost performance and minimise manual correction. We compared its performance without correction with an established QCA system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Deep learning models integrating user-defined ground-truth points were developed using 2455 images from the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2 (FAME 2) study. External validation was performed on a dataset of 580 images. Vessel dimensions from 203 images with mild/moderate stenoses segmented by <em>AngioPy</em> (without correction) and an established QCA system (Medis QFR®) were compared (609 diameters).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The top-performing model had an average F1 score of 0.927 (pixel accuracy 0.998, precision 0.925, sensitivity 0.930, specificity 0.999) with 99.2 % of masks exhibiting an F1 score &gt; 0.8. Similar results were seen with external validation (F1 score 0.924, pixel accuracy 0.997, precision 0.921, sensitivity 0.929, specificity 0.999). Vessel dimensions from <em>AngioPy</em> exhibited excellent agreement with QCA (<em>r</em> = 0.96 [95 % CI 0.95–0.96], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; mean difference − 0.18 mm [limits of agreement (LOA): −0.84 to 0.49]), including the minimal luminal diameter (<em>r</em> = 0.93 [95 % CI 0.91–0.95], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; mean difference − 0.06 mm [LOA: −0.70 to 0.59]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div><em>AngioPy</em>, an open-source tool, performs rapid and accurate coronary segmentation without the need for manual correction. It has the potential to increase the accuracy and efficiency of QCA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\"418 \",\"pages\":\"Article 132598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527324012208\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527324012208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:定量冠状动脉造影术(QCA)通常采用传统的边缘检测算法,这种算法通常需要人工校正。这对下游三维冠状动脉重建和计算血流动力学指标(如血管造影得出的部分血流储备)的准确性有重要影响。我们开发了用于冠状动脉分割的深度学习模型 AngioPy,该模型采用用户定义的地面实况点来提高性能并最大限度地减少人工校正。我们将其未进行修正的性能与成熟的 QCA 系统进行了比较:方法:我们使用 "分数血流储备与多血管造影评估 2"(FAME 2)研究中的 2455 幅图像,开发了集成用户定义的地面实况点的深度学习模型。在 580 张图像的数据集上进行了外部验证。比较了由 AngioPy(未经校正)和成熟的 QCA 系统(Medis QFR®)分割的 203 幅轻度/中度狭窄图像中的血管尺寸(609 个直径):表现最好的模型的平均 F1 得分为 0.927(像素准确度为 0.998,精确度为 0.925,灵敏度为 0.930,特异度为 0.999),99.2% 的掩膜显示 F1 得分大于 0.8。外部验证的结果与此类似(F1 得分为 0.924,像素准确度为 0.997,精确度为 0.921,灵敏度为 0.929,特异度为 0.999)。AngioPy 的血管尺寸与 QCA 非常吻合(r = 0.96 [95 % CI 0.95-0.96],p 结论:AngioPy 是一种开放式的血管成像系统:AngioPy 是一款开源工具,能快速、准确地进行冠状动脉分割,无需人工校正。它有望提高 QCA 的准确性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AngioPy Segmentation: An open-source, user-guided deep learning tool for coronary artery segmentation

Background

Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) typically employs traditional edge detection algorithms that often require manual correction. This has important implications for the accuracy of downstream 3D coronary reconstructions and computed haemodynamic indices (e.g. angiography-derived fractional flow reserve).
We developed AngioPy, a deep-learning model for coronary segmentation that employs user-defined ground-truth points to boost performance and minimise manual correction. We compared its performance without correction with an established QCA system.

Methods

Deep learning models integrating user-defined ground-truth points were developed using 2455 images from the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2 (FAME 2) study. External validation was performed on a dataset of 580 images. Vessel dimensions from 203 images with mild/moderate stenoses segmented by AngioPy (without correction) and an established QCA system (Medis QFR®) were compared (609 diameters).

Results

The top-performing model had an average F1 score of 0.927 (pixel accuracy 0.998, precision 0.925, sensitivity 0.930, specificity 0.999) with 99.2 % of masks exhibiting an F1 score > 0.8. Similar results were seen with external validation (F1 score 0.924, pixel accuracy 0.997, precision 0.921, sensitivity 0.929, specificity 0.999). Vessel dimensions from AngioPy exhibited excellent agreement with QCA (r = 0.96 [95 % CI 0.95–0.96], p < 0.001; mean difference − 0.18 mm [limits of agreement (LOA): −0.84 to 0.49]), including the minimal luminal diameter (r = 0.93 [95 % CI 0.91–0.95], p < 0.001; mean difference − 0.06 mm [LOA: −0.70 to 0.59]).

Conclusion

AngioPy, an open-source tool, performs rapid and accurate coronary segmentation without the need for manual correction. It has the potential to increase the accuracy and efficiency of QCA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
期刊最新文献
Female sex is independently associated with poor health-related quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease across 14 countries: the INTERASPIRE study Association of Baseline SSRI use with post-STEMI outcomes in patients with depression Sex differences in cardiomyopathies: Presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and outcomes in a prospective cohort Characteristics, readmission patterns and trends in hospitalisations for chronic coronary disease in Western Australia, 2005 to 2022 Editorial of “Sex difference in clinically suspected immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis: a single-institute retrospective study with seven-year follow-up” to International Journal of Cardiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1