连接医院和家庭的哮喘远程健康教育(TEACHH)试点研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY Journal of Asthma Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1080/02770903.2024.2408304
Sean M Frey, Ignacio Sanchez, Maria Fagnano, Andrea Milne Wenderlich, Jennifer R Mammen, Jill S Halterman
{"title":"连接医院和家庭的哮喘远程健康教育(TEACHH)试点研究。","authors":"Sean M Frey, Ignacio Sanchez, Maria Fagnano, Andrea Milne Wenderlich, Jennifer R Mammen, Jill S Halterman","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2024.2408304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of a novel intervention of health literacy-informed, telemedicine-enhanced asthma education and home management support for hospitalized children and caregivers, and assess caregiver perspectives of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot randomized trial of the Telehealth Education for Asthma Connecting Hospital and Home (TEACHH) intervention vs. standardized care (SC) for children (5-13 yrs) hospitalized with asthma. Participants in TEACHH received health literacy-informed teaching prior to discharge, including pictorial materials (e.g. flipchart, action plan), color- and shape-coded medication labels, and medication demonstration. Two Zoom-based follow-up teaching visits were completed within 1-month of discharge. Feasibility was assessed by tracking visit completion, and we measured preliminary outcomes using health records (i.e. total asthma-related acute healthcare visits) and blinded surveys of caregivers 2-, 4-, and 6-months post-discharge (i.e. symptom-free days, quality of life). We interviewed caregivers about their perceptions of TEACHH. Transcripts were coded inductively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 26 children and interviewed 14 caregivers (9 TEACHH, 5 SC). All inpatient sessions were completed, as were 77% of virtual visits. Both groups experienced improved symptoms and quality of life over time. Caregivers valued the teaching, involvement of children, visual tools, and color-coded information of TEACHH. They described child-specific benefits, greater support after discharge, and improved asthma-related communication, and indicated that other families would benefit from similar teaching.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A novel program of patient-centered asthma education was feasible in both hospital and home settings and well received by caregivers. A larger study is needed to assess the impact of TEACHH on childhood asthma morbidity.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: </strong>NCT04995692 (Registration date 8/9/2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"416-426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Telehealth Education for Asthma Connecting Hospital and Home (TEACHH) pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Sean M Frey, Ignacio Sanchez, Maria Fagnano, Andrea Milne Wenderlich, Jennifer R Mammen, Jill S Halterman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02770903.2024.2408304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of a novel intervention of health literacy-informed, telemedicine-enhanced asthma education and home management support for hospitalized children and caregivers, and assess caregiver perspectives of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot randomized trial of the Telehealth Education for Asthma Connecting Hospital and Home (TEACHH) intervention vs. standardized care (SC) for children (5-13 yrs) hospitalized with asthma. Participants in TEACHH received health literacy-informed teaching prior to discharge, including pictorial materials (e.g. flipchart, action plan), color- and shape-coded medication labels, and medication demonstration. Two Zoom-based follow-up teaching visits were completed within 1-month of discharge. Feasibility was assessed by tracking visit completion, and we measured preliminary outcomes using health records (i.e. total asthma-related acute healthcare visits) and blinded surveys of caregivers 2-, 4-, and 6-months post-discharge (i.e. symptom-free days, quality of life). We interviewed caregivers about their perceptions of TEACHH. Transcripts were coded inductively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 26 children and interviewed 14 caregivers (9 TEACHH, 5 SC). All inpatient sessions were completed, as were 77% of virtual visits. Both groups experienced improved symptoms and quality of life over time. Caregivers valued the teaching, involvement of children, visual tools, and color-coded information of TEACHH. They described child-specific benefits, greater support after discharge, and improved asthma-related communication, and indicated that other families would benefit from similar teaching.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A novel program of patient-centered asthma education was feasible in both hospital and home settings and well received by caregivers. A larger study is needed to assess the impact of TEACHH on childhood asthma morbidity.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: </strong>NCT04995692 (Registration date 8/9/2021).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asthma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"416-426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asthma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2024.2408304\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2024.2408304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估为住院儿童和护理人员提供的以健康知识为基础的远程医疗强化哮喘教育和家庭管理支持这一新型干预措施的可行性,并评估护理人员对该干预措施的看法:我们针对哮喘住院儿童(5-13 岁)开展了 TEACHH 干预与标准化护理(SC)的试点随机试验。TEACHH 的参与者在出院前接受了以健康知识为基础的教学,包括图解材料(如挂图、行动计划)、颜色和形状编码的药物标签以及药物演示。出院后 1 个月内完成了两次基于 Zoom 的后续教学访问。我们使用健康记录(即与哮喘相关的急性期就诊总次数)和出院后 2 个月、4 个月和 6 个月对护理人员进行的盲法调查(即无症状天数、生活质量)来衡量初步结果。我们采访了护理人员,了解他们对 TEACHH 的看法。我们对笔录进行了归纳编码:我们招募了 26 名儿童,并采访了 14 名护理人员(9 名 TEACHH,5 名 SC)。所有住院治疗均已完成,77%的虚拟访问也已完成。随着时间的推移,两组儿童的症状和生活质量都有所改善。护理人员非常重视 TEACHH 的教学、儿童参与、可视化工具和彩色编码信息。他们描述了针对儿童的益处、出院后得到的更多支持以及与哮喘有关的交流得到的改善,并表示其他家庭也将从类似的教学中受益:结论:以患者为中心的新型哮喘教育计划在医院和家庭环境中都是可行的,并且深受护理人员的欢迎。需要进行更大规模的研究,以评估 TEACHH 对儿童哮喘发病率的影响:NCT04995692(注册日期:2021 年 9 月 8 日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Telehealth Education for Asthma Connecting Hospital and Home (TEACHH) pilot study.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of a novel intervention of health literacy-informed, telemedicine-enhanced asthma education and home management support for hospitalized children and caregivers, and assess caregiver perspectives of the intervention.

Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized trial of the Telehealth Education for Asthma Connecting Hospital and Home (TEACHH) intervention vs. standardized care (SC) for children (5-13 yrs) hospitalized with asthma. Participants in TEACHH received health literacy-informed teaching prior to discharge, including pictorial materials (e.g. flipchart, action plan), color- and shape-coded medication labels, and medication demonstration. Two Zoom-based follow-up teaching visits were completed within 1-month of discharge. Feasibility was assessed by tracking visit completion, and we measured preliminary outcomes using health records (i.e. total asthma-related acute healthcare visits) and blinded surveys of caregivers 2-, 4-, and 6-months post-discharge (i.e. symptom-free days, quality of life). We interviewed caregivers about their perceptions of TEACHH. Transcripts were coded inductively.

Results: We enrolled 26 children and interviewed 14 caregivers (9 TEACHH, 5 SC). All inpatient sessions were completed, as were 77% of virtual visits. Both groups experienced improved symptoms and quality of life over time. Caregivers valued the teaching, involvement of children, visual tools, and color-coded information of TEACHH. They described child-specific benefits, greater support after discharge, and improved asthma-related communication, and indicated that other families would benefit from similar teaching.

Conclusions: A novel program of patient-centered asthma education was feasible in both hospital and home settings and well received by caregivers. A larger study is needed to assess the impact of TEACHH on childhood asthma morbidity.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04995692 (Registration date 8/9/2021).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma
Journal of Asthma 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
期刊最新文献
Dried fruit, acetate, and asthma: a mediation Mendelian randomization analysis. Causal effects of pediatric asthma on psychiatric disorders: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Construction of indicators for evaluating the quality of extended care for children with asthma. Efficacy of medical education combined with extended care on adherence to inhaled glucocorticoids and clinical effects in patients with bronchial asthma. Emotion regulation among adults with asthma: Links with short-acting inhaler medication overuse and utilization of acute medical care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1