Zachary P Simpson, Joshua Mott, Kyle Elkin, Anthony Buda, Joshua Faulkner, Cathleen Hapeman, Greg McCarty, Maryam Foroughi, W Dean Hively, Kevin King, Will Osterholz, Chad Penn, Mark Williams, Lindsey Witthaus, Martin Locke, Ethan Pawlowski, Brent Dalzell, Gary Feyereisen, Christine Dolph, David Bjorneberg, Kossi Nouwakpo, Christopher W Rogers, Isis Scott, Carl H Bolster, Lisa Duriancik, Peter J A Kleinman
{"title":"不同农业环境中的磷易变性与遗留来源。","authors":"Zachary P Simpson, Joshua Mott, Kyle Elkin, Anthony Buda, Joshua Faulkner, Cathleen Hapeman, Greg McCarty, Maryam Foroughi, W Dean Hively, Kevin King, Will Osterholz, Chad Penn, Mark Williams, Lindsey Witthaus, Martin Locke, Ethan Pawlowski, Brent Dalzell, Gary Feyereisen, Christine Dolph, David Bjorneberg, Kossi Nouwakpo, Christopher W Rogers, Isis Scott, Carl H Bolster, Lisa Duriancik, Peter J A Kleinman","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.20632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The buffering of phosphorus (P) in the landscape delays management outcomes for water quality. If stored in labile form (readily exchangeable and bioavailable), P may readily pollute waters. We studied labile P and its intensity for >600 soils and sediments across seven study locations in the United States. Stocks of labile P were large enough to sustain high P losses for decades, indicating the transport-limited regime typical of legacy P. Sediments were commonly more P-sorptive than nearby soils. Soils in the top 5 cm had 1.3-3.0 times more labile P than soils at 5-15 cm. Stratification in soil test P and total P was, however, less consistent. As P exchange via sorption processes follows the difference in intensities between soil/sediment surface and solution, we built a model for the equilibrium phosphate concentration at net zero sorption (EPC<sub>0</sub>) as a function of labile P (quantity) and buffer capacity. Despite widely varying properties across sites, the model generalized well for all soils and sediments: EPC<sub>0</sub> increased sharply with more labile P and to greater degree when buffer capacity was low or sorption sites were likely more saturated. This quantity-intensity-capacity relationship is central to the P transport models we rely on today. Our data inform the improvement of such P models, which will be necessary to predict the impacts of legacy P. Further, this work reaffirms the position of labile P as a key focus for environmental P management-a view Dr. Sharpley developed in the 1980s with fewer data and resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phosphorus lability across diverse agricultural contexts with legacy sources.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary P Simpson, Joshua Mott, Kyle Elkin, Anthony Buda, Joshua Faulkner, Cathleen Hapeman, Greg McCarty, Maryam Foroughi, W Dean Hively, Kevin King, Will Osterholz, Chad Penn, Mark Williams, Lindsey Witthaus, Martin Locke, Ethan Pawlowski, Brent Dalzell, Gary Feyereisen, Christine Dolph, David Bjorneberg, Kossi Nouwakpo, Christopher W Rogers, Isis Scott, Carl H Bolster, Lisa Duriancik, Peter J A Kleinman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeq2.20632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The buffering of phosphorus (P) in the landscape delays management outcomes for water quality. If stored in labile form (readily exchangeable and bioavailable), P may readily pollute waters. We studied labile P and its intensity for >600 soils and sediments across seven study locations in the United States. Stocks of labile P were large enough to sustain high P losses for decades, indicating the transport-limited regime typical of legacy P. Sediments were commonly more P-sorptive than nearby soils. Soils in the top 5 cm had 1.3-3.0 times more labile P than soils at 5-15 cm. Stratification in soil test P and total P was, however, less consistent. As P exchange via sorption processes follows the difference in intensities between soil/sediment surface and solution, we built a model for the equilibrium phosphate concentration at net zero sorption (EPC<sub>0</sub>) as a function of labile P (quantity) and buffer capacity. Despite widely varying properties across sites, the model generalized well for all soils and sediments: EPC<sub>0</sub> increased sharply with more labile P and to greater degree when buffer capacity was low or sorption sites were likely more saturated. This quantity-intensity-capacity relationship is central to the P transport models we rely on today. Our data inform the improvement of such P models, which will be necessary to predict the impacts of legacy P. Further, this work reaffirms the position of labile P as a key focus for environmental P management-a view Dr. Sharpley developed in the 1980s with fewer data and resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
景观中磷(P)的缓冲作用会延迟水质的管理结果。如果磷以可迁移形式(易于交换和生物利用)储存,就很容易污染水体。我们研究了美国 7 个研究地点超过 600 种土壤和沉积物中的可移动磷及其浓度。可溶性磷的储量大到足以维持数十年的高磷损失,这表明遗留磷具有典型的迁移限制机制。顶部 5 厘米土壤中的可利用钾是 5-15 厘米土壤的 1.3-3.0 倍。然而,土壤测试 P 和总 P 的分层情况却不太一致。由于土壤/沉积物表面与溶液之间的磷交换是通过吸附过程进行的,因此我们建立了一个模型,将净零吸附时的磷平衡浓度(EPC0)作为可溶性磷(数量)和缓冲能力的函数。尽管不同地点的特性差异很大,但该模型对所有土壤和沉积物都有很好的通用性:EPC0 随可变 P 的增加而急剧增加,当缓冲能力较低或吸附点饱和度较高时,EPC0 的增加程度更大。这种数量-强度-容量的关系是我们今天所依赖的磷迁移模型的核心。我们的数据为改进此类 P 模型提供了信息,这对于预测遗留 P 的影响是必要的。此外,这项工作再次确认了可溶性 P 作为环境 P 管理重点的地位--这是 Sharpley 博士在 20 世纪 80 年代数据和资源较少的情况下提出的观点。
Phosphorus lability across diverse agricultural contexts with legacy sources.
The buffering of phosphorus (P) in the landscape delays management outcomes for water quality. If stored in labile form (readily exchangeable and bioavailable), P may readily pollute waters. We studied labile P and its intensity for >600 soils and sediments across seven study locations in the United States. Stocks of labile P were large enough to sustain high P losses for decades, indicating the transport-limited regime typical of legacy P. Sediments were commonly more P-sorptive than nearby soils. Soils in the top 5 cm had 1.3-3.0 times more labile P than soils at 5-15 cm. Stratification in soil test P and total P was, however, less consistent. As P exchange via sorption processes follows the difference in intensities between soil/sediment surface and solution, we built a model for the equilibrium phosphate concentration at net zero sorption (EPC0) as a function of labile P (quantity) and buffer capacity. Despite widely varying properties across sites, the model generalized well for all soils and sediments: EPC0 increased sharply with more labile P and to greater degree when buffer capacity was low or sorption sites were likely more saturated. This quantity-intensity-capacity relationship is central to the P transport models we rely on today. Our data inform the improvement of such P models, which will be necessary to predict the impacts of legacy P. Further, this work reaffirms the position of labile P as a key focus for environmental P management-a view Dr. Sharpley developed in the 1980s with fewer data and resources.