{"title":"针对牛肉表面产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的有效净化方法,以应用于牛肉屠体卫生。","authors":"Shouhei Hirose , Akiko Tomaru , Hiroshi Akiyama , Yukiko Hara-Kudo","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective methods for decontamination of Shiga toxin-producing <em>Escherichia coli</em> (STEC) on beef were evaluated by 48 mL spraying, 100 mL, and 500 mL flushing with ethanol, hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, acidified sodium chlorite, and sodium hypochlorite in this study. The flushing with 500 mL of 1,000 ppm peracetic acid was most effective, reducing pathogens by 2.8 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, followed by 1,200 ppm acidified sodium chlorite. The spraying with 1,000 ppm peracetic acid reduced pathogens by 1.6 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>. The flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite, and 50, 100, 200, and 500 ppm peracetic acid significantly reduced the STEC population compared with those treated with distilled water (<em>p</em> < 0.05), reducing pathogens by 2.1, 2.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.1 and 2.4 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Additionally, the flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite significantly changed the color of beef samples (<em>p</em> < 0.05), whereas 100–500 ppm peracetic acid did not significantly change the color (<em>p</em> > 0.05). The flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite and 200 and 500 ppm peracetic acid significantly changed the odor of beef samples compared with those treated with distilled water (<em>p</em> < 0.05). There was no difference in the reduction of STEC population between peracetic acid treatment at 25 °C and 55 °C, with or without washing with sterilized distilled water after decontamination. Washing with distilled water after flushing with peracetic acid tended to reduce the odor of the samples. These results suggest that treatment with 100, 200, and 500 ppm peracetic acid, followed by washing with distilled water, might reduce the STEC population without retaining the odor of the sanitizer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 11","pages":"Article 100366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Decontamination Methods for Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli on Beef Surfaces for Application in Beef Carcass Hygiene\",\"authors\":\"Shouhei Hirose , Akiko Tomaru , Hiroshi Akiyama , Yukiko Hara-Kudo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Effective methods for decontamination of Shiga toxin-producing <em>Escherichia coli</em> (STEC) on beef were evaluated by 48 mL spraying, 100 mL, and 500 mL flushing with ethanol, hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, acidified sodium chlorite, and sodium hypochlorite in this study. The flushing with 500 mL of 1,000 ppm peracetic acid was most effective, reducing pathogens by 2.8 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, followed by 1,200 ppm acidified sodium chlorite. The spraying with 1,000 ppm peracetic acid reduced pathogens by 1.6 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>. The flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite, and 50, 100, 200, and 500 ppm peracetic acid significantly reduced the STEC population compared with those treated with distilled water (<em>p</em> < 0.05), reducing pathogens by 2.1, 2.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.1 and 2.4 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Additionally, the flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite significantly changed the color of beef samples (<em>p</em> < 0.05), whereas 100–500 ppm peracetic acid did not significantly change the color (<em>p</em> > 0.05). The flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite and 200 and 500 ppm peracetic acid significantly changed the odor of beef samples compared with those treated with distilled water (<em>p</em> < 0.05). There was no difference in the reduction of STEC population between peracetic acid treatment at 25 °C and 55 °C, with or without washing with sterilized distilled water after decontamination. Washing with distilled water after flushing with peracetic acid tended to reduce the odor of the samples. These results suggest that treatment with 100, 200, and 500 ppm peracetic acid, followed by washing with distilled water, might reduce the STEC population without retaining the odor of the sanitizer.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"87 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 100366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001509\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effective Decontamination Methods for Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli on Beef Surfaces for Application in Beef Carcass Hygiene
Effective methods for decontamination of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) on beef were evaluated by 48 mL spraying, 100 mL, and 500 mL flushing with ethanol, hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, acidified sodium chlorite, and sodium hypochlorite in this study. The flushing with 500 mL of 1,000 ppm peracetic acid was most effective, reducing pathogens by 2.8 log CFU/cm2, followed by 1,200 ppm acidified sodium chlorite. The spraying with 1,000 ppm peracetic acid reduced pathogens by 1.6 log CFU/cm2. The flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite, and 50, 100, 200, and 500 ppm peracetic acid significantly reduced the STEC population compared with those treated with distilled water (p < 0.05), reducing pathogens by 2.1, 2.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.1 and 2.4 log CFU/cm2, respectively. Additionally, the flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite significantly changed the color of beef samples (p < 0.05), whereas 100–500 ppm peracetic acid did not significantly change the color (p > 0.05). The flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite and 200 and 500 ppm peracetic acid significantly changed the odor of beef samples compared with those treated with distilled water (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the reduction of STEC population between peracetic acid treatment at 25 °C and 55 °C, with or without washing with sterilized distilled water after decontamination. Washing with distilled water after flushing with peracetic acid tended to reduce the odor of the samples. These results suggest that treatment with 100, 200, and 500 ppm peracetic acid, followed by washing with distilled water, might reduce the STEC population without retaining the odor of the sanitizer.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.